Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 15–22 | Cite as

The Urine Marker Test: An Alternative Approach to Supervised Urine Collection for Doping Control

  • Anne-Marie ElbeEmail author
  • Stine Nylansted Jensen
  • Peter Elsborg
  • Monika Wetzke
  • Getachew A. Woldemariam
  • Bernd Huppertz
  • Ruprecht Keller
  • Anthony W. Butch
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

Urine sample collection for doping control tests is a key component of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s fight against doping in sport. However, a substantial number of athletes experience difficulty when having to urinate under supervision. Furthermore, it cannot always be ensured that athletes are actually delivering their own urine. A method that can be used to alleviate the negative impact of a supervised urination procedure and which can also identify urine as coming from a specific athlete is the urine marker test. Monodisperse low molecular weight polyethylene glycols (PEGs) are given orally prior to urination. Urine samples can be traced to the donor by analysis of the PEGs previously given.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the use of the urine marker during urine doping control testing.

Methods

Two studies investigated athletes’ acceptance of this new method via two questionnaires (n = 253). Furthermore, a third study (n = 91) investigated whether ingestion of the marker can identify the urine as coming from a specific person and whether the marker interferes with the detection of prohibited substances.

Results and conclusions

The results indicate that this new method finds wide acceptance both from athletes who have only heard about the procedure and those who have actually tested the new method. Furthermore, the marker, which can identify urine as coming from a specific person, does not interfere with the detection of prohibited substances.

Keywords

Urine Sample Multiple Reaction Monitoring Transition Doping Agent Urine Marker Doping Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Partnership for Clean Competition. We would like to thank Nadine Debois and Alain Frey (both INSEP) for their help in the data collection for study 1.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Ruprecht Keller, Anne-Marie Elbe, and Anthony W. Butch received a grant from Partnership for Clean Competition entitled “A new labelling procedure which allows to identify urine as coming from a particular person.”

Stine Nylansted Jensen, Peter Elsborg, Monika Wetzke, Getachew A. Woldemariam, and Bernd Huppertz declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Corrigan B, Kazlauskas R. Drug testing at the Sydney Olympics. Med J Aust. 2000;173:312–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    WADA in 2014. World Anti-Doping Agency. International Standard for Testing and Investigations (ISTI). Version 6.0. Montreal; 2014. https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/resources/files/wada_guidelines_urine_sample_collection_2014_v1.0_en.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2015.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Strahler K, Elbe AM. Wollen—aber nicht können: das problem dopingkontrolle. Leistungssport. 2007;37(4):35–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elbe AM, Overbye M. Urine doping controls: the athletes’ perspective. Int J Sport Policy Politics. 2014;6(2):227–240.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elbe AM, Overbye M. Implications of anti-doping regulations for athletes’ wellbeing. In: Hoberman J, Waddington I, Møller V. The Routledge companion to sport and drugs. New York: Routledge International Handbooks; 2015. p. 322–336.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elbe AM, Schlegel MM, Brand R. Psychogenic urine retention during doping controls: consequences for elite athletes. Perform Enhanc Health. 2012;1(2):66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strahler K, Elbe AM. Entwicklung einer Skala zur Erfassung psychogenen Harnverhaltens bei Athletinnen und Athleten während der Dopingkontrollen. Z Sportpsychol. 2009;16(4):156–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kellmann M. Underrecovery and overtraining: different concepts—similar impact? In: Kellmann M, editor. Enhancing recovery: preventing underperformance in athletes. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 2002. p. 3–24.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams GW, Degenhardt ET. Paruresis: a survey of a disorder of micturition. J Gen Psych. 1954;51(1):19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soifer S, Himle J, Walsh K. Paruresis (shy bladder syndrome): a cognitive-behavioral treatment approach. Soc Work Health Care. 2010;49(5):494–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gauchel G, Huppertz B, Feiertag H, et al. Clinical use of polyethylene glycols as marker substances and determination in urine by liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2003;787(2):271–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huppertz B, Gauchel G, Feiertag H, et al. Urine labeling with orally applied marker substances in drug substitution therapy. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42(6):621–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Punitha H. Medindia in 2008. Chennai; 2008. http://www.medindia.net/news/Now-a-Fake-Penis-That-Deceives-Drug-Testers-38376-1.htm. Accessed 4 Mar 2015.
  16. 16.
    Mottram DR. Drugs in sport. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2011.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alaranta A, Alaranta H, Holmila J, et al. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(10):842–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langman LJ, Snozek CLH. LC-MS in drug analysis: methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology, vol. 902. Rochester: Humana Press; 2012. p. 115–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Marie Elbe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stine Nylansted Jensen
    • 1
  • Peter Elsborg
    • 1
  • Monika Wetzke
    • 2
  • Getachew A. Woldemariam
    • 3
  • Bernd Huppertz
    • 4
  • Ruprecht Keller
    • 4
  • Anthony W. Butch
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Nutrition, Exercise and SportsUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen NDenmark
  2. 2.RUMA GmbHCologneGermany
  3. 3.UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineGeffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Central Laboratory at the Hospitals of the City of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations