Author’s Reply to Liu et al.: “Important Issues Concerning Use of the Term ‘Copers’ in Chronic Ankle Instability Research”
- 195 Downloads
We want to thank Liu and colleagues  for taking the time to continue the discussion around terminology and definitions for this unique population of individuals who have sprained their ankle but fail to develop the signs and symptoms associated with chronic ankle instability (CAI). The initial recommendation to use the term ‘coper’ was based in large part on our purpose: identifying trends in the literature to make recommendations that could help reduce between-study variability when examining this unique patient population, much like Delahunt et al.  did for those with CAI. Approximately 71 % (15/21) of published reports at the time our review was conducted used the term ‘coper’, while two additional studies used ‘ankle sprain copers’. Since then, three additional papers have been published in this area and all include the term ‘coper’ in some fashion (ankle sprain copers [3, 4], coper ). Currently, therefore, 83 % of the current literature includes the term ‘coper’ in some...
KeywordsInjury Risk Ankle Sprain Lateral Ankle Ankle Injury Organismic Constraint
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
- 1.Liu W, Jain TK, Santos M, et al. Important issues concerning use of the term ‘copers’ in chronic ankle instability research. Sports Med. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0279-2
- 9.McKeon PO, Hertel J. The dynamical-systems approach to studying athletic injury. Athl Ther Today. 2006;11(1):31–3.Google Scholar
- 12.Docherty CL, Bleakley CM, Hertel J, et al. Single-leg drop landing motor control strategies following acute ankle sprain injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports. Epub 2014 Jun 27. doi: 10.1111/sms.12282.