Sports Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 12, pp 1703–1716 | Cite as

Outcome Predictors for Conservative Patellofemoral Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Simon Lack
  • Christian Barton
  • Bill Vicenzino
  • Dylan Morrissey
Systematic Review



Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is highly prevalent within both sporting and recreationally active populations. Multiple treatment approaches have been advocated for the management of PFP, attempting to address both intrinsic and extrinsic factors thought to contribute to the development and persistence of pain. A number of predictors of treatment success have been proposed, and evaluated, for directing intervention choice.


Our aim was to systematically review the literature that identifies outcome predictors of specific conservative interventions in the management of PFP, including quality of the current evidence, to guide clinical practice and future studies investigating outcome predictors within this population.

Data Sources

The AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to April 2013.

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

Following initial searching, all potential papers were assessed by two independent reviewers for inclusion using a checklist developed from the inclusion criteria. Cited, and citing, references were also searched in Google Scholar, but unpublished work was not sought. Methodological quality was assessed using a previously designed quality assessment scale. Definitions for levels of evidence were guided by recommendations made by van Tulder et al.


Fifteen low-quality (LQ) cohort studies were included. No RCTs were found. This systematic review identified the evaluation of 205 conservative management outcome predictor variables. Of this large number of variables that have been assessed, 19 (9 %) were found to significantly predict a successful outcome. Where two or more outcome predictors and success determinants were consistent between studies, data were pooled. Within these studies, the low number of participants per output variable, and absence of controls, is likely to compromise the validity of the predictor’s accuracy. Very limited evidence identified higher functional index questionnaire scores (mean 0.82, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.18–1.46), greater forefoot valgus (mean 0.67, 95 % CI 0.05–1.28) and greater rearfoot eversion magnitude peak (mean −0.93, 95 % CI −1.84 to −0.01) to significantly predict improved outcomes with orthoses interventions. Shorter symptom duration (p = 0.019), lower frequency of pain (p = 0.012), younger age, faster vastus medialis oblique reflex response time (p = 0.026), negative patella apprehension, absence of chondromalacia patella, tibial tubercle deviation of <14.6 mm and greater total quadriceps cross-sectional area on magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.01), and reduced eccentric average quadriceps peak torque (p = 0.015) significantly predicted exercise intervention success following multivariate statistical analysis. Limited evidence identified increased Q-angle (mean 0.38, 95 % CI 0.05–0.72) and very limited evidence identified greater usual pain (mean 0.43, 95 % CI 0.01–0.85) to predict taping intervention success.


This systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of current derivation level studies identifying indicators of prediction for conservative PFP management. The overall strength of evidence was low. With appropriate caution, clinicians should consider taping for those with greater usual pain, orthoses for older individuals and exercise for younger individuals, and orthoses intervention for patients with greater forefoot valgus and rearfoot eversion magnitude peak. RCTs with evaluation of outcome prediction as a primary aim are clearly warranted to provide clinicians with robust evidence and facilitate evidence-informed, tailored intervention to this heterogeneous patient population.


Exercise Intervention Electronic Supplementary Material Table Outcome Predictor Lysholm Score Clinical Prediction Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. Simon Lack, Christian Barton, Bill Vicenzino and Dylan Morrissey have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Supplementary material

40279_2014_231_MOESM1_ESM.docx (62 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 238 kb)


  1. 1.
    Baquie P, Brukner P. Injuries presenting to an Australian sports medicine centre: a 12-month study. Clin J Sport Med. 1997;7(1):28–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, et al. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(2):95–101.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D’Hondt NE, Struijs PA, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Orthotic devices for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD002267.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powers CM, Bolgla LA, Callaghan MJ, et al. Patellofemoral pain: proximal, distal, and local factors, 2nd International Research Retreat. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(6):A1–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lankhorst NE, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. Risk factors for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(2):81–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pappas E, Wong-Tom WM. Prospective predictors of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2012;4(2):115–20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lankhorst NE, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. Factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(4):193–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khayambashi K, Mohammadkhani Z, Ghaznavi K, et al. The effects of isolated hip abductor and external rotator muscle strengthening on pain, health status, and hip strength in females with patellofemoral pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(1):22–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakagawa TH, Muniz TB, Baldon Rde M, et al. The effect of additional strengthening of hip abductor and lateral rotator muscles in patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(12):1051–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukuda TY, Melo WP, Zaffalon BM, et al. Hip posterolateral musculature strengthening in sedentary women with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(10):823–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dolak KL, Silkman C, Medina McKeon J, et al. Hip strengthening prior to functional exercises reduces pain sooner than quadriceps strengthening in females with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(8):560–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collins N, Crossley K, Beller E, et al. Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a1735.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barton C, Balachandar V, Lack S, et al. Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes and biomechanical mechanisms. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(6):417–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mason M, Keays SL, Newcombe PA. The effect of taping, quadriceps strengthening and stretching prescribed separately or combined on patellofemoral pain. Physiother Res Int. 2011;16(2):109–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins NJ, Bisset LM, Crossley KM, et al. Efficacy of nonsurgical interventions for anterior knee pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Sports Med. 2012;42(1):31–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nimon G, Murray D, Sandow M, et al. Natural history of anterior knee pain: a 14- to 20-year follow-up of nonoperative management. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(1):118–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, et al. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises in patellofemoral pain: a 5-year prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(5):1122–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collins NJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Crossley KM, et al. Prognostic factors for patellofemoral pain: a multicentre observational analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(4):227–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vicenzino B, Collins N, Cleland J, et al. A clinical prediction rule for identifying patients with patellofemoral pain who are likely to benefit from foot orthoses: a preliminary determination. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(12):862–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barton CJ, Menz HB, Crossley KM. Clinical predictors of foot orthoses efficacy in individuals with patellofemoral pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(9):1603–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iverson CA, Sutlive TG, Crowell MS, et al. Lumbopelvic manipulation for the treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: development of a clinical prediction rule. Including commentary by Powers CM, with authors’ response. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(6):297–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lesher JD, Sutlive TG, Miller GA, et al. Development of a clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome who respond to patellar taping. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(11):854–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sutlive TG, Mitchell SD, Maxfield SN, et al. Identification of individuals with patellofemoral pain whose symptoms improved after a combined program of foot orthosis use and modified activity: a preliminary investigation. Phys Ther. 2004;84(1):49–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piva SR, Fitzgerald GK, Wisniewski S, et al. Predictors of pain and function outcome after rehabilitation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(8):604–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pattyn E, Mahieu N, Selfe J, et al. What predicts functional outcome after treatment for patellofemoral pain? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(10):1827–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Natri A, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Which factors predict the long-term outcome in chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome? A 7-year prospective follow-up study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(11):1572–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, et al. Which factors predict outcome in the treatment program of anterior knee pain? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002;12(1):40–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wittstein JR, O’Brien SD, Vinson EN, et al. MRI evaluation of anterior knee pain: predicting response to nonoperative treatment. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(9):895–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Selfe J, Harper L, Pedersen I, et al. Cold legs: a potential indicator of negative outcome in the rehabilitation of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Knee. 2003;10(2):139–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lan TY, Lin WP, Jiang CC, et al. Immediate effect and predictors of effectiveness of taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(8):1626–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kannus P, Niittymaki S. Which factors predict outcome in the nonoperative treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome? A prospective follow-up study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(3):289–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barton CJ, Menz HB, Levinger P, et al. Greater peak rearfoot eversion predicts foot orthoses efficacy in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(9):697–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stanton TR, Hancock MJ, Maher CG, et al. Critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules that aim to optimize treatment selection for musculoskeletal conditions. Phys Ther. 2010;90(6):843–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, et al. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barton CJ, Webster KE, Menz HB. Evaluation of the scope and quality of systematic reviews on nonpharmacological conservative treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(9):529–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barton CJ, Munteanu SE, Menz HB, et al. The efficacy of foot orthoses in the treatment of individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2010;40(5):377–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hume P, Hopkins W, Rome K, et al. Effectiveness of foot orthoses for treatment and prevention of lower limb injuries: a review. Sports Med. 2008;38(9):759–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(12):1290–9.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Collins NJ, Crossley KM, Darnell R, et al. Predictors of short and long term outcome in patellofemoral pain syndrome: a prospective longitudinal study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mills K, Blanch P, Dev P, et al. A randomised control trial of short term efficacy of in-shoe foot orthoses compared with a wait and see policy for anterior knee pain and the role of foot mobility. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(4):247–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Crowell MS, Wofford NH. Lumbopelvic manipulation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20(3):113–20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mallen CD, Peat G, Thomas E, et al. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):655–61.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis I. Prospective evidence for a hip etiology in patellofemoral pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(6):1120–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Peters JS, Tyson NL. Proximal exercises are effective in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(5):689–700.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Crossley K, Bennell K, Green S, et al. Physical therapy for patellofemoral pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(6):857–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Lack
    • 1
  • Christian Barton
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bill Vicenzino
    • 5
  • Dylan Morrissey
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, William Harvey Research Institute, Bart’s and the London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of London, Mile End HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Complete Sports CareMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Pure Sports MedicineLondonUK
  4. 4.Lower Extremity Gait Studies, Health SciencesLa Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia
  5. 5.Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations