Application of Decision-Making Theory to the Regulation of Muscular Work Rate during Self-Paced Competitive Endurance Activity
- 1.4k Downloads
Successful participation in competitive endurance activities requires continual regulation of muscular work rate in order to maximise physiological performance capacities, meaning that individuals must make numerous decisions with regards to the muscular work rate selected at any point in time. Decisions relating to the setting of appropriate goals and the overall strategic approach to be utilised are made prior to the commencement of an event, whereas tactical decisions are made during the event itself. This review examines current theories of decision-making in an attempt to explain the manner in which regulation of muscular work is achieved during athletic activity. We describe rational and heuristic theories, and relate these to current models of regulatory processes during self-paced exercise in an attempt to explain observations made in both laboratory and competitive environments. Additionally, we use rational and heuristic theories in an attempt to explain the influence of the presence of direct competitors on the quality of the decisions made during these activities. We hypothesise that although both rational and heuristic models can plausibly explain many observed behaviours in competitive endurance activities, the complexity of the environment in which such activities occur would imply that effective rational decision-making is unlikely. However, at present, many proposed models of the regulatory process share similarities with rational models. We suggest enhanced understanding of the decision-making process during self-paced activities is crucial in order to improve the ability to understand regulation of performance and performance outcomes during athletic activity.
KeywordsWork Rate Exercise Bout Behaviour Alternative Pace Strategy Afferent Feedback
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. To the knowledge of the authors, there are no conflicts of interest that are directly or indirectly related to the contents of this manuscript.
- 2.Noakes TD. Fatigue is a brain-derived emotion that regulates the exercise behaviour to ensure the protection of whole body homeostasis. Front Physiol. 2012;3(82):1–13.Google Scholar
- 3.St Clair Gibson A, DeKoning JJ, Thompson KG, et al. Crawling to the finish line—why do endurance athletes collapse? Implications for understanding mechanisms underlying pacing and fatigue. Sports Med. 2013; 43(6):413–24.Google Scholar
- 4.St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Rauch LHG, et al. The role of information processing between the brain and peripheral physiological systems in pacing and perception of effort. Sports Med. 2006; 36(8):706–22.Google Scholar
- 5.Renfree A, St Clair Gibson A. Influence of different performance levels on pacing strategy during the female World Championship marathon race. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013; 8(3):279–85.Google Scholar
- 6.Bach DR, Dolan RJ. Knowing how much you don’t know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:573–86.Google Scholar
- 16.Simon HA. Rational decision-making in business organizations, Nobel memorial lecture 1978. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1978/simon-lecture.pdf.
- 17.Savage LJ. The foundations of statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Dover; 1954.Google Scholar
- 24.Thomas G, Renfree A. The effect of secret clock manipulation on 10 km cycle time trial performance. Int J Arts Sci. 2010;3(9):193–202.Google Scholar
- 27.Gilovich T, Griffin DW, Kahneman D, editors. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
- 33.Baden DA, Warwick-Evans LA, Lakomy J. Am I nearly there? The effect of anticipated running distance on perceived exertion and attentional focus. J Sport Exercise Psychol. 2004;27:215–31.Google Scholar
- 35.Noakes TD. Lore of running. Cape Town: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
- 37.Watson D. Mood and temperament. New York: The Guilford Press; 2000.Google Scholar
- 43.Epstein S. Intuition from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In: Plessner H, Betsch C, Betsch T, editors. Intuition in judgement and decision-making. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2010.Google Scholar
- 48.Appelt KC, Milch KF, Handgraaf MJJ, et al. The decision-making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgement and decision-making research. Judgm Decis Mak. 2011;6(3):252–62.Google Scholar