Notes
The study was funded by Astellas Pharma, Inc., and Medivation, Inc., USA.
The study was funded by Astellas Pharma, Inc., and Medivation, Inc., USA.
The study received financial support from Janssen Cilag SA, Colombia.
References
Duran A, et al. Number Needed to Treat and Associated Incremental Costs of Treatment with Enzalutamide Versus Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Spain and the United Kingdom. 22nd Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research : (plus poster) abstr. PCN113, 20 May 2017. Available from: URL: https://www.ispor.org/ScientificPresentationsDatabase/Presentation/71875?pdfid=49446.
Okumura H, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Enzalutamide for Patients with Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Japan. 22nd Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research : (plus poster) abstr. PCN114, 20 May 2017. Available from: URL: https://www.ispor.org/ScientificPresentationsDatabase/Presentation/71857?pdfid=49435.
Gamboa O, et al. A Cost Comparison of Treatment with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in the Pre-Chemotherapy Setting Followed by Enzalutamide in the Post-Chemotherapy Setting Versus the Opposite Treatment Sequence in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with Non-Visceral Metastases in Colombia. 22nd Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research : abstr. PCN75, 20 May 2017. Available from: URL: https://www.ispor.org/ScientificPresentationsDatabase/Presentation/73591?pdfid=49489.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finding cost-effective treatment options in mCRPC. PharmacoEcon Outcomes News 780, 17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40274-017-4069-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40274-017-4069-6