Skip to main content
Log in

Cost effectiveness of newer treatments for prostate cancer

  • Clinical study
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

References

  1. Yeung K, et al. Cost-Utility Analysis of Enzalutamide Versus Abiraterone for the Treatment of Docetaxel Refractory Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer. 18th Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research : abstr. PCN86, 18 May 2013.

  2. Persson U, et al. Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Abiraterone Acetate as Treatment for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer after Failure of Docetaxel Using Data from Real Life Treatment Praxis in Sweden. 18th Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research : abstr. PCN40, 18 May 2013.

  3. Joulain F, et al. Cabazitaxel in Second Line (2L) Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: an Economic Evaluation in Sweden. 18th Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research : abstr. PCN61, 18 May 2013.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cost effectiveness of newer treatments for prostate cancer. PharmacoEcon Outcomes News 680, 4 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40274-013-0463-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40274-013-0463-x

Navigation