References
Elbasha E. Cost-effectiveness risk-aversion curves: comparison of risk-adjusted performance measures and expected-utility approaches. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022;40:497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01123-5.
Sendi P. Dealing with bad risk in cost-effectiveness analysis: the cost-effectiveness risk-aversion curve. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39:161–9.
Sendi P, Matter-Walstra K, Schwenkglenks M. Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis: budget impact and risk aversion. Healthcare. 2021;9:1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00969-5.
Plantinga A, van der Meer R, Sortino F. The impact of downside risk on risk-adjusted performace of mutual funds in the Euronext markets. (July 19, 2001), Available at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.277352.
Jia J, Dyer JS. A standard measure of risk and risk-value models. Manage Sci. 1996;42(12):1691–705.
Sortino F, van der Meer R, Plantinga A. The dutch triangle: a framework to measure upside potential relative to downside risk. J Portf Manag. 1999;26(1):50–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest; this commentary received no funding.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sendi, P., Schwenkglenks, M. Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures: A Comment on Elbasha. PharmacoEconomics 40, 739–740 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01153-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01153-7