Economic Implications of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and Treatment: A Guide for Clinicians
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide, with significant morbidity and associated costs. Treatment allocation depends on the stage of diagnosis; however, resource utilization can be significant across all stages. We aimed to summarize the available data on the cost effectiveness of surveillance of and treatments for HCC in the context of current treatment guidelines. We performed a focused review of studies investigating the economic burden and cost effectiveness of HCC surveillance treatment modalities published between January 2000 and January 2019. The overall economic burden of HCC is increasing in the USA and in several countries worldwide due to its rising incidence and the proliferation of therapies. Liver transplantation is a cost-effective strategy for early-stage HCC treatment in selected patients. In settings where liver transplantation is not available or in patients awaiting transplant, ablative or locoregional therapies are cost effective with increases in quality-adjusted life-years. First-line therapy with sorafenib for advanced stage HCC is cost effective in the treatment of compensated cirrhosis. The cost effectiveness of recently approved systemic therapies for advanced HCC require further investigation. Existing studies have shown that guideline-recommended surveillance techniques and several available therapies for the treatment of HCC are cost effective; however, there are limitations in the literature, including reliance on suboptimal modeling with incomplete/simplified model structure or inadequate inputs. With increasing therapeutic options in patients with HCC, understanding their relative value is critical in designing HCC treatment algorithms.
AL conducted the literature search and wrote the manuscript. NDP conceived the study and outlined the manuscript concept, and reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No funding was received in relation to this review.
Conflict of interest
Alisa Likhitsup declared no conflict of interest. Neehar Parikh has the following declarations: consultant—Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Freenome; advisory boards—Eisai, Exelixis, Wako, Bayer; research funding—Bayer, Exact Sciences, Target Pharmasolutions.
- 28.Zangneh HF, Wong WW, Sander B, Bell CM, Mumtaz K, Kowgier M, et al. Cost effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance after a sustained virologic response to therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus infection and advanced fibrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(9):1840.e16–1849.e16.Google Scholar
- 36.McAdam-Marx C, McGarry LJ, Hane CA, Biskupiak J, Deniz B, Brixner DI. All-cause and incremental per patient per year cost associated with chronic hepatitis C virus and associated liver complications in the United States: a managed care perspective. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011;17(7):531–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.Zhu AX, Kang Y-K, Yen C-J, Finn RS, Galle PR, Llovet JM, et al. Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30937-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Vitale A, Farinati F, Burra P, Trevisani F, Giannini EG, Ciccarese F, et al. Utility-based criteria for selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation: a multicenter cohort study using the alpha-fetoprotein model as a survival predictor. Liver Transpl. 2015;21(10):1250–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.Landman MP, Feurer ID, Pinson CW, Moore DE. Which is more cost-effective under the MELD system: primary liver transplantation, or salvage transplantation after hepatic resection or after loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria? HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(11):783–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 66.Thein HH, Isaranuwatchai W, Qiao Y, Wong K, Sapisochin G, Chan KKW, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of potentially curative and combination treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma with person-level data in a Canadian setting. Cancer Med. 2017;6(9):2017–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 68.Parikh ND, Marshall VD, Green M, Lawrence TS, Razumilava N, Owen D, et al. Effectiveness and cost of radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of SEER-Medicare. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018;62(5):673–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 70.Vilgrain V, Bouattour M, Sibert A, Lebtahi R, Ronot M, Pageaux G-P, et al. SARAH: a randomised controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of selective internal radiation therapy (with yttrium-90 microspheres) and sorafenib in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2017;66(1):S85–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 78.Vilgrain V, Pereira H, Assenat E, Guiu B, Ilonca AD, Pageaux GP, et al. Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1624–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar