Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Diagnostic Definitions in Claims Data on Healthcare Cost Estimates: Evidence from a Large-Scale Panel Data Analysis of Diabetes Care in Japan

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Inaccurate estimates of diabetes-related healthcare costs can undermine the efficiency of resource allocation for diabetes care. The quantification of these costs using claims data may be affected by the method for defining diagnoses.

Objectives

The aims were to use panel data analysis to estimate diabetes-related healthcare costs and to comparatively evaluate the effects of diagnostic definitions on cost estimates.

Research design

Monthly panel data analysis of Japanese claims data.

Subjects

The study included a maximum of 141,673 patients with type 2 diabetes who received treatment between 2005 and 2013.

Measures

Additional healthcare costs associated with diabetes and diabetes-related complications were estimated for various diagnostic definition methods using fixed-effects panel data regression models.

Results

The average follow-up period per patient ranged from 49.4 to 52.3 months. The number of patients identified as having type 2 diabetes varied widely among the diagnostic definition methods, ranging from 14,743 patients to 141,673 patients. The fixed-effects models showed that the additional costs per patient per month associated with diabetes ranged from US$180 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 178–181] to US$223 (95 % CI 221–224). When the diagnostic definition excluded rule-out diagnoses, the diabetes-related complications associated with higher additional healthcare costs were ischemic heart disease with surgery (US$13,595; 95 % CI 13,568–13,622), neuropathy/extremity disease with surgery (US$4594; 95 % CI 3979–5208), and diabetic nephropathy with dialysis (US$3689; 95 % CI 3667–3711).

Conclusions

Diabetes-related healthcare costs are sensitive to diagnostic definition methods. Determining appropriate diagnostic definitions can further advance healthcare cost research for diabetes and its applications in healthcare policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1033–46.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:596–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rice DP. Cost-of-illness studies: fact or fiction? Lancet. 1994;344:1519–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ettaro L, Songer TJ, Zhang P, Engelgau MM. Cost-of-illness studies in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:149–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seuring T, Archangelidi O, Suhrcke M. The economic costs of type 2 diabetes: a global systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:811–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng CS, Lee JY, Toh MP, Ko Y. Cost-of-illness studies of diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;105:151–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ringborg A, Yin DD, Martinell M, Stålhammar J, Lindgren P. The impact of acute myocardial infarction and stroke on health care costs in patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16:576–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke P, Leal J, Kelman C, Smith M, Colagiuri S. Estimating the cost of complications of diabetes in Australia using administrative health-care data. Value Health. 2008;11:199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oglesby AK, Secnik K, Barron J, Al-Zakwani I, Lage MJ. The association between diabetes related medical costs and glycemic control: a retrospective analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006;4:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Okamoto E. Declining accuracy in disease classification on health insurance claims: should we reconsider classification by principal diagnosis? J Epidemiol. 2010;20:166–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanihara S, Okamoto E, Une H. A statistical analysis of ‘rule-out’ diagnoses in outpatient health insurance claims in Japan. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:1070–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:S11–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitazato H, Ikeda S, Izumi K, et al. A method to investigate medical expenditure in Japan in relationship of stage progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus complications and macroangiopathy. Obesity Diabetes. 2010;9:S48–64 [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Honeycutt AA, Segel JE, Hoerger TJ, et al. Comparing cost-of-illness estimates from alternative approaches: an application to diabetes. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:303–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shrestha SS, Zhang P, Albright A, Finkelstein EA. Medical expenditures associated with diabetes among privately insured U.S. youth in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1097–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Trogdon JG, Hylands T. Nationally representative medical costs of diabetes by time since diagnosis. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2307–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tunceli O, Wade R, Gu T, Bouchard JR, Aagren M, Luo W. Cost of diabetes: comparison of disease-attributable and matched cohort cost estimation methods. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pagano E, Bo S, Petrinco M, Rosato R, Merletti F, Gregori D. Factors affecting hospitalization costs in type 2 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complicat. 2009;23:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee LJ, Yu AP, Cahill KE, et al. Direct and indirect costs among employees with diabetic retinopathy in the United States. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:1549–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu AZ, Qiu Y, Radican L, Wells BJ. Health care and productivity costs associated with diabetic patients with macrovascular comorbid conditions. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2187–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Durden ED, Alemayehu B, Bouchard JR, Chu BC, Aagren M. Direct health care costs of patients with type 2 diabetes within a privately insured employed population, 2000 and 2005. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:1460–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Currie CJ, Poole CD, Woehl A, et al. The financial costs of healthcare treatment for people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in the UK with particular reference to differing severity of peripheral neuropathy. Diabet Med. 2007;24:187–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alva ML, Gray A, Mihaylova B, Leal J, Holman RR. The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84). Diabet Med. 2015;32:459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Clarke PM, Glasziou P, Patel A, et al. Event rates, hospital utilization, and costs associated with major complications of diabetes: a multicountry comparative analysis. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gerdtham UG, Clarke P, Hayes A, Gudbjornsdottir S. Estimating the cost of diabetes mellitus-related events from inpatient admissions in Sweden using administrative hospitalization data. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27:81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Japan’s Health Service Bureau. National Health and Nutrition Survey 2007. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou09/dl/01-kekka.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2016.

Download references

Author contributions

HF contributed to the study concept, design, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. SI, TS, and TF contributed to the study concept and data interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haruhisa Fukuda.

Ethics declarations

This research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (Grant Number 25713029) and a Grant-in-Aid for Health Sciences Research by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (Grant Number H25-Seisaku-Shitei-011).

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest exist for Haruhisa Fukuda, Shunya Ikeda, Takeru Shiroiwa and Takashi Fukuda.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuda, H., Ikeda, S., Shiroiwa, T. et al. The Effects of Diagnostic Definitions in Claims Data on Healthcare Cost Estimates: Evidence from a Large-Scale Panel Data Analysis of Diabetes Care in Japan. PharmacoEconomics 34, 1005–1014 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0402-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0402-3

Keywords

Navigation