Skip to main content

Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?

Abstract

The terms health, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and quality of life (QoL) are used interchangeably. Given that these are three key terms in the literature, their appropriate and clear use is important. This paper reviews the history and definitions of the terms and considers how they have been used. It is argued that the definitions of HRQoL in the literature are problematic because some definitions fail to distinguish between HRQoL and health or between HRQoL and QoL. Many so-called HRQoL questionnaires actually measure self-perceived health status and the use of the phrase QoL is unjustified. It is concluded that the concept of HRQoL as used now is confusing. A potential solution is to define HRQoL as the way health is empirically estimated to affect QoL or use the term to only signify the utility associated with a health state.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cunillera O, Tresserras R, Rajmil L, Vilagut G, Brugulat P, Herdman M, et al. Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:853–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Makai P, Brouwer WBF, Koopmanschap MA, Stolk EA, Nieboer AP. Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:83–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hill MR, Noonan VK, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:438–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH. Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:2797–806.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schrag A. The EQ-5D—a generic quality of life measure—is a useful instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:67–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Elkinton JR. Medicine and the quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1966;64:711–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Spitzer WO. State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:465–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol. 1982;1:61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bergner M. Measurement of health status. Med Care. 1985;23:696–704.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ware JE. The status of health assessment 1994. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:327–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:908–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fanshel S, Bush JW. A health-status index and its application to health-services outcomes. Oper Res. 1970;18:1021–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):593–600.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. 48th ed. Geneva: Basic documents of the World Health Organization; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ware JE, Gandek B. The SF-36 Health Survey: development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project. Int J Ment Health. 1994;23:49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Brooks R. The EuroQol group after 25 years. Rotterdam: Springer, Netherlands; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Patrick DL, Bush JW, Chen MM. Toward an operational definition of health. J Health Soc Behav. 1982;14:6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, et al. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1–188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Moons P, Budts W, De Geest S. Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43:891–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ferrans CE. Quality of life: conceptual issues. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1990;6:248–54.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bowling A. Measuring health. Third. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Peasgood T, Brazier J, Mukuria C, Rowen D. A conceptual comparison of well-being measures used in the UK. Policy Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Care Interventions. Universities of Sheffield and York. EEPRU Research Report 026. Policy paper/document 01/09/2014. 2014.

  25. 25.

    Rejeski WJ, Mihalko SL. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56A(Special Issue II):23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kuyken W, Group TW. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cummins RA. Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49:699–706.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil. 1995;16:51–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Meeberg GA. Quality of life: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18:32–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bowling A, Brazier J. Introduction. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1337–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hays RD, Reeve BB. Measurement and modeling of health-related quality of life. In: Killewo J, Heggenhougen HK, Quah SR, editors. Epidemiology and demography in public health. San Diego: Academic Press; 2010. p. 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1995;273:59–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ebrahim S. Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1383–94.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gold MR, Patrick DL, Torrance GW, Fryback D, Hadorn DC, Kamlet M, et al. Identifying and valuing outcomes. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bergner M. Quality of life, health status, and clinical research. Med Care. 1989;27:S148–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Moons P. Why call it health-related quality of life when you mean perceived health status? Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;3:275–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Leplège A, Hunt S. The problem of quality of life in medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Michalos A. Social indicators research and health-related quality of life research. Soc Indic Res. 2004;65:27–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Baker R, Robinson A. Responses to standard gambles: are preferences “well constructed”? Health Econ. 2004;13:37–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nord E, Arnesen T, Menzel P, Pinto JL. Towards a more restricted use of the term “Quality of Life.” Qual Life Newsl. 2001;26:3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33:337–43.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lau ALD, Cummins RA, McPherson W. An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Soc Indic Res. 2005;72:403–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Postscript. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:266S–9S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;272:619–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

JB proposed initial ideas and paper structure, MK wrote the first and the revised drafts after discussion with JB. JB made comments and revisions on all drafts. Both JB and MK responded to comments from referees.

Professor John Brazier was supported in the preparation/submission of this paper by the HEOM Theme of the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber (NIHR CLAHRC YH). http://www.clahrc-yh.nir.ac.uk. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. JB and MK declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milad Karimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karimi, M., Brazier, J. Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?. PharmacoEconomics 34, 645–649 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Life Satisfaction
  • HRQoL Measure
  • Personal Wellbeing Index
  • HRQoL Questionnaire
  • Health Status Questionnaire