Advertisement

PharmacoEconomics

, Volume 32, Issue 11, pp 1093–1104 | Cite as

The Health Economics of Bladder Cancer: An Updated Review of the Published Literature

  • Christina Yeung
  • Tuan Dinh
  • Joseph Lee
Review Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a current view of the economic burden of bladder cancer, with a focus on the cost effectiveness of available interventions. This review updates a previous systematic review and includes 72 new papers published between 2000 and 2013. Bladder cancer continues to be one of the most common and expensive malignancies. The annual cost of bladder cancer in the USA during 2010 was $US4 billion and is expected to rise to $US5 billion by 2020. Ten years ago, urinary markers held the potential to lower treatment costs of bladder cancer. However, subsequent real-world experiments have demonstrated that further work is necessary to identify situations in which these technologies can be applied in a cost-effective manner. Adjunct cytology remains a part of diagnostic standard of care, but recent research suggests that it is not cost effective due to its low diagnostic yield. Analysis of intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), neo-adjuvant therapy for cystectomy, and robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy suggests that these technologies are cost effective and should be implemented more widely for appropriate patients. The existing literature on the cost effectiveness of bladder cancer treatments has improved substantially since 2000. The body of work now includes many new models, registry analyses, and real-world studies. However, there is still a need for new implementation guidelines, new risk modeling tools, and a better understanding of the empirical burden of bladder cancer.

Keywords

Bladder Cancer Radical Cystectomy MIBC Intravesical Therapy Intravesical Chemotherapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Andrea Kress for writing and editing assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Tuan Dinh and Joseph Lee have previously worked on a consulting project for Pacific Edge Limited. Pacific Edge markets Cxbladder, a non-invasive, urine-based detection test to determine the likelihood of bladder cancer in patients presenting with hematuria. Christina Yeung does not have any relevant conflicts of interest. T Dinh, J Lee, and C Yeung all contributed to the compilation of articles, and discussion and review of this article. C Yeung and J Lee wrote sections 1, 2, and 6 and sections 3, 4 and 7 of the manuscript, respectively. T Dinh drafted section 5 with assistance from Andrea Kress and is the guarantor of the work.

References

  1. 1.
    Ploeg M, Aben KKH, Kiemeney LA. The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world. World J Urol. 2009;27(3):289–93. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0383-3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014;64(1):9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208.
  3. 3.
    Botteman MF, Pashos CL, Redaelli A, Laskin B, Hauser R. The health economics of bladder cancer: a comprehensive review of the published literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(18):1315–30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14750899.
  4. 4.
    American Cancer Society. Bladder cancer. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/bladdercancer/detailedguide/index.
  5. 5.
    Sexton WJ, Wiegand LR, Correa JJ, Politis C, Dickinson SI, Kang LC. Bladder cancer: a review of non-muscle invasive disease. Cancer Control. 2010;17(4):256–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al. Urinary bladder. In: AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. New York: Springer; 2010. pp. 497–505.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, et al. Guidelines on bladder cancer (TaT1 and CIS); 2013. pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark PE, Agarwal N, Biagioli MC, et al. Bladder cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(4):446–75.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(2):117–28. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq495.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2010, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2013. 2011. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010. Accessed 18 Mar 2014.
  11. 11.
    Konety BR, Joyce GF, Wise M. Bladder and upper tract urothelial cancer. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1636–45. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hemani ML, Makarov DV, Huang WC, Taneja SS. The effect of changes in Medicare reimbursement on the practice of office and hospital-based endoscopic surgery for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(5):1264–71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24875.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Konety BR, Dhawan V, Allareddy V, Joslyn S a. Impact of malpractice caps on use and outcomes of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. J Urol. 2005;173(6):2085–9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158137.30303.65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sangar VK, Ragavan N, Matanhelia SS, Watson MW, Blades Ra. The economic consequences of prostate and bladder cancer in the UK. BJU Int. 2005;95(1):59–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05249.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yabroff KR, Davis WW, Lamont EB, et al. Patient time costs associated with cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(1):14–23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yabroff KR, Kim Y. Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2009;115(18 Suppl):4362–73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    James A, Gore J. The costs of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2013;40:98109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hedelin H, Holmäng S, Wiman L. The cost of bladder tumour treatment and follow-up. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36(5):344–7. doi: 10.1080/003655902320783845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim S-G, Hahm M-I, Choi K-S, Seung N-Y, Shi H-R, Park E-C. The economic burden of cancer in Korea in 2002. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008;17(2):136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carter AJR, Nguyen CN. A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:526. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-526.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riley GF, Potosky AL, Lubitz JD, Kessler LG. Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis. Med Care. 1995;33(8):828–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Avritscher E, Cooksley C. Clinical model of lifetime cost of treating bladder cancer and associated complications. Urology. 2006;68(3):549–53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yabroff KR, Lamont EB, Mariotto A, et al. Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(9):630–41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee LJ-H, Chang Y-Y, Liou S-H, Wang J-D. Estimation of benefit of prevention of occupational cancer for comparative risk assessment: methods and examples. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(8):582–6. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100462.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Racioppi M, Volpe A, Falabella R, et al. The cost of treatment and follow-up of bladder cancer in Italy. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2007;79(3):111–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sievert KD, Amend B, Nagele U, et al. Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs? World J Urol. 2009;27(3):295–300. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0395-z.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grasso M. Bladder cancer: a major public health issue. Eur Urol Suppl. 2008;7(7):510–5. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2008.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cooksley CD, Avritscher EBC, Grossman HB, et al. Clinical model of cost of bladder cancer in the elderly. Urology. 2008;71(3):519–25. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Strope SA, Ye Z, Hollingsworth JM, Hollenbeck BK. Patterns of care for early stage bladder cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(11):2604–11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25007.Patterns.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hollenbeck BK, Ye Z, Dunn RL, Montie JE, Birkmeyer JD. Provider treatment intensity and outcomes for patients with early-stage bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(8):571–80. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp039.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hemani ML, Bennett CL. The excessive cost of early stage bladder cancer care: are providers really to blame? Cancer. 2010;116(15):3530–2. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hollingsworth JM, Zhang Y, Krein SL, Ye Z, Hollenbeck BK. Understanding the variation in treatment intensity among patients with early stage bladder cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(15):3587–94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):639–53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chou R, Dana T. Screening adults for bladder cancer: a review of the evidence for the US preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(7):461–8.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    National Cancer Institute: PDQ Bladder and Other Urothelial Cancers Screening. 2014. http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/bladder/HealthProfessional.
  36. 36.
    Messing EM, Young TB, Hunt VB, et al. Comparison of bladder cancer outcome in men undergoing hematuria home screening versus those with standard clinical presentations. Urology. 1995;45(3):387–96 (discussion 396–97).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Messing EM, Madeb R, Young T, et al. Long-term outcome of hematuria home screening for bladder cancer in men. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2173–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thériault G, Tremblay C, Armstrong B. Bladder cancer screening among primary aluminum production workers in Quebec. J Occup Med. 1990;32(9):869–72.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Friedman GD, Ra Hiatt, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV, Weiss NS. Problems in assessing screening experience in observational studies of screening efficacy: example of urinalysis screening for bladder cancer. J Med Screen. 1995;2(4):219–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ellwein L, Farrow G. An assessment of the impact of urine cytology screening using a computer-based model of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 1984;11(4):585–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Svatek RS, Sagalowsky AI, Lotan Y. Economic impact of screening for bladder cancer using bladder tumor markers: a decision analysis. Urol Oncol. 2006;24(4):338–43. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.11.025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lotan Y, Svatek RS, Sagalowsky AI. Should we screen for bladder cancer in a high-risk population?: A cost per life-year saved analysis. Cancer. 2006;107(5):982–90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22084.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lotan Y, Elias K, Svatek RS, et al. Bladder cancer screening in a high risk asymptomatic population using a point of care urine based protein tumor marker. J Urol. 2009;182(1):52–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.142 (discussion 58).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pesch B, Taeger D, Johnen G, et al. Screening for bladder cancer with urinary tumor markers in chemical workers with exposure to aromatic amines. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;. doi: 10.1007/s00420-013-0916-3.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kamat AM, Hegarty PK, Gee JR, et al. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: screening, diagnosis, and molecular markers. Eur Urol. 2013;63(1):4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grossfeld G, Litwin MS, Wolf JS Jr, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy—part II: patient evaluation, cytology. Urology. 2001;4295(01):604–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gray Sears CL, Ward JF, Sears ST, Puckett MF, Kane CJ, Amling CL. Prospective comparison of computerized tomography and excretory urography in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria. J Urol. 2002;168(6):2457–60. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000036541.52816.98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hofland CA, Mariani AJ. Is cytology required for a hematuria evaluation? J Urol. 2004;171(1):324–6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100392.23046.17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Trivedi D, Messing EM. Commentary: the role of cytologic analysis of voided urine in the work-up of asymptomatic microhematuria. BMC Urol. 2009;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-9-13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Loo R, Whittaker J, Rabrenivich V. National practice recommendations for hematuria: how to evaluate in the absence of strong evidence? Perm J. 2009;13(1):37–46.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Feifer AH, Steinberg J, Tanguay S, Aprikian AG, Brimo F, Kassouf W. Utility of urine cytology in the workup of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in low-risk patients. Urology. 2010;75(6):1278–82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Falebita OA, Lee G, Sweeney P. Urine cytology in the evaluation of urological malignancy revisited: is it still necessary? Urol Int. 2010;84(1):45–9. doi: 10.1159/000273465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Viswanath S, Zelhof B, Ho E, Sethia K, Mills R. Is routine urine cytology useful in the haematuria clinic? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(2):153–5. doi: 10.1308/003588408X242006.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Soloway MS. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: recommendations on bladder cancer-progress in a cancer that lacks the limelight. Eur Urol. 2013;63(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chang SS, Skinner EC, Pope S, Folmer M. Bladder cancer: guideline for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (Stages Ta, T1, and Tis): 2007 update. 2007.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    British Uro-oncology Group (BUG); British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Section of Oncology; Action on Bladder Cancer (ABC). Multi-disciplinary Team (MDT) Guidance for managing bladder cancer. 2nd edition. 2013 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.actiononbladdercancer.org/downloads/36904mdtguidanceformanagingbladdercancer2013.pdf
  57. 57.
    Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Discrepancy between clinical and pathologic stage: impact on prognosis after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(1):137–49. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.021 (discussion 149–51).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chang BS, Kim HL, Yang XJ, Steinberg GD. Correlation between biopsy and radical cystectomy in assessing grade and depth of invasion in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2001;57(6):1063–6 (discussion 1066–7).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fritsche H-M, Burger M, Svatek RS, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with clinical T1 grade 3 urothelial carcinoma treated with radical cystectomy: results from an international cohort. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):300–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Van Der Meijden A, Sylvester R, Collette L, Bono A, Ten Kate F. The role and impact of pathology review on stage and grade assessment of stages Ta and T1 bladder tumors: a combined analysis of 5 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trials. J Urol. 2000;164(5):1533–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Coblentz TR, Mills SE, Theodorescu D. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91(7):1284–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):666–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Konety BR, Allareddy V. Influence of post-cystectomy complications on cost and subsequent outcome. J Urol. 2007;177(1):280–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.074 (discussion 287).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Malavaud B, Vaessen C, Mouzin M, Rischmann P, Sarramon J, Schulman C. Complications for radical cystectomy. Impact of the American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Eur Urol. 2001;39(1):79–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Paulson DF. Complications of radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: a retrospective review of 675 cases in 2 decades. J Urol. 1992;148(5):1401–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brausi MA, Verrini G, De Luca G, et al. The use of local anesthesia with N-DO injector (Physion) for transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder tumors and bladder mapping: preliminary results and cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur Urol. 2007;52(5):1407–11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Uchida A, Yonou H, Hayashi E, et al. Intravesical instillation of bacille Calmette–Guérin for superficial bladder cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology. 2007;69(2):275–9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Madeb R, Golijanin D, Noyes K, et al. Treatment of nonmuscle invading bladder cancer: do physicians in the United States practice evidence based medicine? The use and economic implications of intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Cancer. 2009;115(12):2660–70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24311.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lee CT, Barocas D, Globe DR, et al. Economic and humanistic consequences of preventable bladder tumor recurrences in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer cases. J Urol. 2012;188(6):2114–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Feifer A, Xie X, Brophy JM, Segal R, Kassouf W. Contemporary cost analysis of single instillation of mitomycin after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in a universal health care system. Urology. 2010;76(3):652–6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rao PK, Stephen Jones J. Routine perioperative chemotherapy instillation with initial bladder tumor resection: a reconsideration of economic benefits. Cancer. 2009;115(5):997–1004. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Huang GJ, Hamilton AS, Lo M, Stein JP, Penson DF. Predictors of intravesical therapy for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: results from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program 2003 patterns of care project. J Urol. 2008;180(2):520–4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.016 (discussion 524).PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Green DA, Rink M, Cha EK, et al. Cost-effective treatment of low-risk carcinoma not invading bladder muscle. BJU Int. 2013;111(3 Pt B):E78–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11454.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Svatek RS, Hollenbeck BK, Holmäng S, et al. The economics of bladder cancer: costs and considerations of caring for this disease. Eur Urol. Epub 2014 Jan 21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.006.
  75. 75.
    Kulkarni GS, Finelli A, Fleshner NE, Jewett M aS, Lopushinsky SR, Alibhai SMH. Optimal management of high-risk T1G3 bladder cancer: a decision analysis. PLoS Med. 2007;4(9):e284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040284.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kulkarni GS, Alibhai SMH, Finelli A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of immediate radical cystectomy versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin therapy for high-risk, high-grade (T1G3) bladder cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(23):5450–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24634.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Jønler M, Lund L, Bisballe S. Holmium:YAG laser vaporization of recurrent papillary tumours of the bladder under local anaesthesia. BJU Int. 2004;94(3):322–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04882.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wong KA, Zisengwe G, Athanasiou T, O’Brien T, Thomas K. Outpatient laser ablation of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: is it safe, tolerable and cost-effective? BJU Int. 2013;112(5):561–7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Smith ZL, Christodouleas JP, Keefe SM, Malkowicz SB, Guzzo TJ. Bladder preservation in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): a review of the literature and a practical approach to therapy. BJU Int. 2013;112(1):13–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11762.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ludwig AT, Inampudi L, O’Donnell MA, Kreder KJ, Williams RD, Konety BR. Two-surgeon versus single-surgeon radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: impact on patient outcomes and costs. Urology. 2005;65(3):488–92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Mmeje CO, Martin AD, Nunez-Nateras R, Parker AS, Thiel DD, Castle EP. Cost analysis of open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14(1):26–31. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0292-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Smith A, Kurpad R, Lal A, Nielsen M, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2010;183(2):505–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative analysis of outcomes and costs following open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1239–44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lee R, Chughtai B, Herman M, Shariat SF, Scherr DS. Cost-analysis comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RC) vs open RC. BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):976–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10468.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Lee R, Ng CK, Shariat SF, et al. The economics of robotic cystectomy: cost comparison of open versus robotic cystectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1886–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10114.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology. 2011;77(3):621–5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F. A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2007;79(3):127–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18041364. Accessed 4 Feb 2014.
  88. 88.
    Stenzl A, Sherif H, Kuczyk M. Radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder for invasive bladder cancer: a critical analysis of long term oncological, functional and quality of life results. Int Br J Urol. 2010;36(5):537–47. doi: 10.1590/S1677-55382010000500003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Somani BK, Gimlin D, Fayers P, N’Dow J. Quality of life and body image for bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion—a prospective cohort study with a systematic review of literature. Urology. 2009;74(5):1138–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Berrum-Svennung I, Hedelin H, Holmäng S. Costs of radical cystectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(1):36–41. doi: 10.1080/00365590410002537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Davies BJ, Allareddy V, Konety BR. Oncology: effect of postcystectomy infectious complications on cost, length of stay, and mortality. Urology. 2009;73:598–602. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.080.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kim SP, Shah ND, Karnes RJ, et al. The implications of hospital acquired adverse events on mortality, length of stay and costs for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2011–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Konety BR, Dhawan V, Allareddy V, M a O’Donnell. Association between volume and charges for most frequently performed ambulatory and nonambulatory surgery for bladder cancer. Is more cheaper? J Urol. 2004;172(3):1056–61. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000136382.51688.21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Stevenson SM, Deibert CM, McKiernan JM. Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In: Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. 2013.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Mitra A, Skinner E. A precystectomy decision model to predict pathological upstaging and oncological outcomes in clinical stage T2 bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2013;111(2):240–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Robinson P, von der Maase H, Bhalla S, et al. Cost-utility analysis of the GC versus MVAC regimens for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2004;4(1):27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lehmann J, Retz M, Stöckle M. Is there standard chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer? Quality of life and medical resources utilization based on largest to date randomized trial. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;47(2):171–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Hall MC, Chang SS, Dalbagni G, et al. Guideline for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (stages Ta, T1, and Tis): 2007 update. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2314–30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG. Cost-effectiveness of a modified care protocol substituting bladder tumor markers for cystoscopy for the followup of patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a decision analytical approach. J Urol. 2002;167(1):75–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Nam RK, Redelmeier DA, Spiess PE, Sampson HA, Fradet Y, Jewett MA. Comparison of molecular and conventional strategies for followup of superficial bladder cancer using decision analysis. J Urol. 2000;163(3):752–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Lachaine J, Valiquette L, Crott R. Economic evaluation of NMP22 in the management of bladder cancer. Can J Urol. 2000;7(2):974–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Van Kessel KEM, Kompier LC, de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. FGFR3 mutation analysis in voided urine samples to decrease cystoscopies and cost in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer surveillance: a comparison of 3 strategies. J Urol. 2013;189(5):1676. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=87014649&site=eds-live.
  103. 103.
    De Bekker-Grob EW, van der Aa MNM, Zwarthoff EC, et al. Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer surveillance for which cystoscopy is partly replaced by microsatellite analysis of urine: a cost-effective alternative? BJU Int. 2009;104(1):41–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08323.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Gayed BA, Seideman C, Lotan Y. Cost-effectiveness of fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with atypical cytology for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. 2013;190(4):1181–6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Kamat A, Karam J. Prospective trial to identify optimal bladder cancer surveillance protocol: reducing costs while maximizing sensitivity. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1119–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Burger M, Zaak D, Stief CG, et al. Photodynamic diagnostics and noninvasive bladder cancer: is it cost-effective in long-term application? A Germany-based cost analysis. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):142–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Otto W, Burger M, Fritsche H. Photodynamic diagnosis for superficial bladder cancer: do all risk-groups profit equally from oncological and economic long-term results? Clin Med Oncol. 2009;(0):53–58. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2872595/. Accessed 6 Mar 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EvideraSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations