Skip to main content
Log in

Perspectives of Pediatric Rheumatologists on Initiating and Tapering Biologics in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Formative Qualitative Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Few studies have examined pediatric rheumatologists’ approaches to treatment decision making for biologic therapy for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). This study presents the qualitative research undertaken to support the development of a Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) survey for tapering in JIA. The study objectives were to (1) describe the treatment decision-making process of pediatric rheumatologists to initiate and taper biologics; and (2) select attributes for a BWS survey.

Methods

Pediatric rheumatologists across Canada were recruited to participate in interviews using purposeful sampling. Interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Initial codes were organized into themes and subthemes using an iterative process. Attributes for the BWS survey were developed from these themes and a literature review was conducted in parallel to inform survey development. Further refinement of the attributes was done through consultation with the research team.

Results

Five pediatric rheumatologists participated in the interviews. Shared decision making was part of the approach to initiating and tapering biologics in their practice. Tapering approaches differed; some pediatric rheumatologists preferred to stop biologics immediately, while others tapered by reducing dose and/or increasing the dose interval over time. A total of 14 attributes were developed for the BWS. Thirteen attributes were selected from the themes that emerged from the qualitative interviews and one attribute was included after review with the research team. Attributes related to patient characteristics included JIA subtype, time in remission, history or presence of joint damage or erosive disease, how challenging it was to achieve remission, and history of flares. Contextual attributes included accessibility of biologics and willingness to taper biologics.

Conclusion

This study contributes to the limited literature on pediatric rheumatologists’ approaches to treatment decision making for biologics in JIA and identifies attributes that affect the decision to both initiate and taper. Further research is planned to implement the BWS survey to understand the importance of the attributes identified. Additional investigation is required to determine if these characteristics align with patient and parent preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moorthy LN, Peterson MG, Hassett AL, Lehman TJ. Burden of childhood-onset arthritis. Pediatr. Rheumatol. 2010;8:20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vanoni F, Minoia F, Malattia C. Biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a narrative review. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176:1147–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravelli A, Consolaro A, Horneff G, Laxer RM, Lovell DJ, Wulffraat NM, et al. Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:819–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Jonas BL, Thieda P, Lohr KN. Biologics for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and critical analysis of the evidence. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prince FHM, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA. Cost of biologics in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a factor not to be overlooked. Pediatr Drugs. 2013;15:271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernatsky S, Duffy C, Malleson P, Feldman DE, St Pierre Y, Clarke AE. Economic impact of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:44–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kip MMA, de Roock S, Currie G, Marshall DA, Grazziotin LR, Twilt M, et al. Costs of medication use among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the Dutch healthcare system. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;21(5):975–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Halyabar O, Mehta J, Ringold S, Rumsey DG, Horton DB. Treatment withdrawal following remission in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Pediatr Drugs. 2019;21:469–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horton DB, Onel KB, Beukelman T, Ringold S. Attitudes and approaches for withdrawing drugs for children with clinically inactive nonsystemic JIA: a survey of the childhood arthritis and rheumatology research alliance. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:352–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Broughton T, Armon K. Defining juvenile idiopathic arthritis remission and optimum time for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug withdrawal: why we need a consensus. Paediatr Drugs. 2012;14:7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipstein EA, Brinkman WB, Sage J, Lannon CM, Morgan DE. Understanding treatment decision making in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative assessment. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2013;11:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guzman J, Gómez-Ramírez O, Jurencak R, Shiff NJ, Berard RA, Duffy CM, et al. What matters most for patients, parents, and clinicians in the course of juvenile idiopathic arthritis? A qualitative study. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:2260–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipstein EA, Dodds CM, Lovell DJ, Denson LA, Britto MT. Making decisions about chronic disease treatment: a comparison of parents and their adolescent children. Health Expect. 2016;19:716–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horton DB, Salas J, Wec A, Kohlheim M, Kapadia P, Beukelman T, et al. Making decisions about stopping medicines for well-controlled juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a mixed-methods study of patients and caregivers. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73:374–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lipstein EA, Britto MT. Evolution of pediatric chronic disease treatment decisions: a qualitative, longitudinal view of parents’ decision-making process. Med Decis Making. 2015;35:703–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuijper TM, Folmer R, Stolk EA, Hazes JMW, Luime JJ. Doctors’ preferences in de-escalating DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete choice experiment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burnett HF, Regier DA, Feldman BM, Miller FA, Ungar WJ. Parents’ preferences for drug treatments in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a discrete choice experiment. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:1382–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37:201–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung KL, Wijnen BFM, Hollin IL, Janssen EM, Bridges JF, Evers SMAA, et al. Using best-worst scaling to investigate preferences in health care. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:1195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. Best–worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ. 2007;26:171–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;14:403–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hollin IL, Craig BM, Coast J, Beusterien K, Vass C, DiSantostefano R, et al. Reporting formative qualitative research to support the development of quantitative preference study protocols and corresponding survey instruments: guidelines for authors and reviewers. Patient. 2020;13:121–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hazlewood GS, Loyola-Sanchez A, Bykerk V, Hull PM, Marshall D, Pham T, et al. Patient and rheumatologist perspectives on tapering DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022;61(2):606–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tymms K, Zochling J, Scott J, Bird P, Burnet S, de Jager J, et al. Barriers to optimal disease control for rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate and high disease activity. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66:190–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vavricka SR, Radivojevic S, Manser CN, Frei P, Burri E, Fried M, et al. Addressing current treatment challenges in Crohn’s disease in real life: a physician’s survey. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:1066–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anink J, Otten MH, Gorter SL, Prince FHM, van Rossum MAJ, van den Berg JM, et al. Treatment choices of paediatric rheumatologists for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: etanercept or adalimumab? Rheumatology. 2013;52:1674–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kearsley-Fleet L, Davies R, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Foster HE, Southwood TR, et al. Factors associated with choice of biologic among children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: results from two UK paediatric biologic registers. Rheumatology. 2016;55:1556–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shenoi S, Nanda K, Schulert GS, Bohnsack JF, Cooper AM, Edghill B, et al. Physician practices for withdrawal of medications in inactive systemic juvenile arthritis, Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) survey. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2019;17:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leblanc CMA, Lang B, Bencivenga A, Chetaille A-L, Dancey P, Dent P, et al. Access to biologic therapies in Canada for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol J Rheumatol. 2012;39:1875–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the Understanding Childhood Arthritis Network (UCAN) CURE consortia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah A. Marshall.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Canada) [Grant number 381280]; Genome Canada (Canada) [OGI-150]; ZonMw (The Netherlands); and ReumaNederland (The Netherlands). DAM is supported by the Arthur J.E. Child Chair in Rheumatology and a Canada Research Chair in Health Systems and Services Research (2008–2018). SB is supported by the Husky Energy Chair in Child and Maternal Health and the Alberta Children’s Hospital Foundation Chair in Pediatric Research. RSMY is supported by the Hak-Ming and Deborah Chiu Chair in Paediatric Translational Research, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto. GSH is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) New Investigator Award.

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

Gillian R. Currie, Tram Pham, Marinka Twilt, Maarten J. IJzerman, Pauline M. Hull, Michelle M.A. Kip, Susanne M. Benseler, Glen S. Hazlewood, Rae S.M. Yeung, Nico M. Wulffraat, Joost F. Swart, Sebastian J. Vastert, and Deborah A. Marshall declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the contents of this article.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (REB19-0360).

Availability of data and material

The ethics approval and consent for this study preclude the sharing of the raw data.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by GRC, TP, and PMH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TP, GRC, and DAM. All authors commented on the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Currie, G.R., Pham, T., Twilt, M. et al. Perspectives of Pediatric Rheumatologists on Initiating and Tapering Biologics in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Formative Qualitative Study. Patient 15, 599–609 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-022-00575-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-022-00575-x

Navigation