Advertisement

Health Preference Research: An Overview

  • Benjamin M. Craig
  • Emily Lancsar
  • Axel C. Mühlbacher
  • Derek S. Brown
  • Jan Ostermann
Commentary

Health preference research (HPR) is dedicated to understanding the value of health and health-related goods and services. The mantra in HPR is “Choice defines value”. With a better understanding of what patients want, providers, regulators, and policy makers can better meet the patient’s needs. For this, researchers typically design and conduct discrete-choice experiments (DCEs), a survey method that quantitatively measures what people want. Unlike in ordinary consumption, choices regarding health are often difficult to observe, are infrequently made, and entail complex and challenging trade-offs (e.g., the quality vs. quantity of life). In DCEs, participants are asked to choose between discrete alternatives based on their preferences and the attributes of each alternative. The effect of the attributes on choice defines the value of health and health-related goods and services from the perspective of a target population. Subgroup analysis can be used to test for distinct preferences...

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the administrative support for the preparation of this paper from the IAHPR. Drs. Craig, Mühlbacher, Lanscar, and Brown serve on the Board of the IAHPR Foundation. Drs. Craig and Mühlbacher are also the founding co-chairs of the Health Preference Research special interest group at the International Society of Quality of Life Research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Benjamin M. Craig, Emily Lancsar, Axel C. Mühlbacher, Derek S. Brown, and Jan Ostermann have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mühlbacher A, Johnson FR. Choice experiments to quantify preferences for health and healthcare: state of the practice. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(3):253–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Craig BM, Mitchell SA. Examining the value of menopausal symptom relief among US women. Value Health. 2016;19(2):158–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whitty JA, Fraenkel L, Saigal C, et al. Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice. The Patient. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.
  4. 4.
    Flynn TN. Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best–worst scaling. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcome Res. 2010;10(3):259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craig BM, Busschbach JJ, Salomon JA. Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods. Med Care. 2009;47(6):634–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Craig BM, Runge SK, Rand-Hendriksen K, et al. Learning and satisficing: an analysis of sequence effects in health valuation. Value Health. 2015;18(2):217–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Witteman HO, Scherer LD, Gavaruzzi T, et al. Design features of explicit values clarification methods: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2016;36(4):453–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berg RL. Health Status Indexes: Proceedings of a Conference Conducted by Health Services Research, Tucson, Arizona, October 1–4, 1972. 1972. Tucson, Arizona: Hospital Research and Educational Trust.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin M. Craig
    • 1
  • Emily Lancsar
    • 2
  • Axel C. Mühlbacher
    • 3
  • Derek S. Brown
    • 4
  • Jan Ostermann
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Business and EconomicsMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Fachbereich Gesundheit und PflegeInstitut Gesundheitsökonomie und MedizinmanagementNeubrandenburgGermany
  4. 4.Brown SchoolWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  5. 5.Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations