Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges

  • Ahmed Rashid
  • Victoria Thomas
  • Toni Shaw
  • Gillian Leng
Current Opinion

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0206-8

Cite this article as:
Rashid, A., Thomas, V., Shaw, T. et al. Patient (2017) 10: 277. doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0206-8

Abstract

Clinical guidelines and health technology assessments are valuable instruments to improve the quality of healthcare delivery and aim to integrate the best available evidence with real-world, expert context. The role of patient and public involvement in their development has grown in recent decades, and this article considers the international literature exploring aspects of this participation, including the integration of experiential and scientific knowledge, recruitment strategies, models of involvement, stages of involvement, and methods of evaluation. These developments have been underpinned by the parallel rise of public involvement and evidence-based medicine as important concepts in health policy. Improving the recruitment of guideline group chairs, widening evidence reviews to include patient preference studies, adapting guidance presentation to highlight patient preference points and providing clearer instructions on how patient organisations can submit their intelligence are emerging proposals that may further enhance patient and public involvement in their processes.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed Rashid
    • 1
  • Victoria Thomas
    • 1
  • Toni Shaw
    • 1
  • Gillian Leng
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)LondonUK

Personalised recommendations