The Potential of Crowdsourcing to Improve Patient-Centered Care

  • Michael Weiner
Current Opinion


Crowdsourcing (CS) is the outsourcing of a problem or task to a crowd. Although patient-centered care (PCC) may aim to be tailored to an individual’s needs, the uses of CS for generating ideas, identifying values, solving problems, facilitating research, and educating an audience represent powerful roles that can shape both allocation of shared resources and delivery of personalized care and treatment. CS can often be conducted quickly and at relatively low cost. Pitfalls include bias, risks of research ethics, inadequate quality of data, inadequate metrics, and observer-expectancy effect. Health professionals and consumers in the US should increase their attention to CS for the benefit of PCC. Patients’ participation in CS to shape health policy and decisions is one way to pursue PCC itself and may help to improve clinical outcomes through a better understanding of patients’ perspectives. CS should especially be used to traverse the quality-cost curve, or decrease costs while preserving or improving quality of care.


Trastuzumab Automate External Defibrillator Individual Patient Preference Personal Tradeoff Creative Professional 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The research reported here was supported by the Regenstrief Institute, Inc., the Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416. Dr. Weiner is Chief of Health Services Research and Development at the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Indianapolis, IN, USA. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.


  1. 1.
    National Center for Biotechnology Information. Crowdsourcing. Accessed 5 Nov 2013.
  2. 2.
    Johnston SC, Hauser SL. Crowdsourcing scientific innovation. Ann Neurol. 2009;65(6):A7–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.21791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ranard BL, Ha YP, Meisel ZF, et al. Crowdsourcing: harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;11:11.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parvanta C, Roth Y, Keller H. Crowdsourcing 101: a few basics to make you the leader of the pack. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(2):163–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohn J. Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience. 2008;58(3):192–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hussey PS, Anderson GF, Osborn R, et al. How does the quality of care compare in five countries? Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(3):89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis K. Slowing the growth of health care costs: learning from international experience. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1751–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson GF, Hurst J, Hussey PS, et al. Health spending and outcomes: trends in OECD countries, 1960–1998. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000;19(3):150–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient centred care. BMJ. 2001;322(7284):444–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newbold KB, Campos S. Media and social media in public health messages: a systematic review. Hamilton: McMaster Institute of Environment & Health; 2011.
  12. 12.
    International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations. Declaration on patient-centred healthcare. Accessed 5 Nov 2013.
  13. 13.
    Merchant RM, Asch DA, Hershey JC, et al. A crowdsourcing innovation challenge to locate and map automated external defibrillators. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(2):229–36.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luengo-Oroz MA, Arranz A, Frean J. Crowdsourcing malaria parasite quantification: an online game for analyzing images of infected thick blood smears. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e167. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2338.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Graber MA, Graber A. Internet-based crowdsourcing and research ethics: the case for IRB review. J Med Ethics. 2013;39(2):115–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Good BM, Su AI. Crowdsourcing for bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(16):1925–33.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    OpenMRS. OpenMRS. Accessed 29 Jan 2014.
  18. 18.
    Norman TC, Bountra C, Edwards AM, et al. Leveraging crowdsourcing to facilitate the discovery of new medicines. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(88):88mr1.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bow HC, Dattilo JR, Jonas AM, et al. A crowdsourcing model for creating preclinical medical education study tools. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):766–70. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828f86ef.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCartney P. Crowdsourcing in healthcare. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013;38(6):392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Behrend TS, Sharek DJ, Meade AW, et al. The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behav Res Methods. 2011;43(3):800–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turner AM, Kirchhoff K, Capurro D. Using crowdsourcing technology for testing multilingual public health promotion materials. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e79.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Cheeney S, et al. Crowdsourcing in eczema research: a novel method of data collection. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11(10):1153–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dasgupta N, Freifeld C, Brownstein JS, et al. Crowdsourcing black market prices for prescription opioids. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e178.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cameron P, Corne DW, Mason CE, et al. Crowdfunding genomics and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2013;14(9):134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indiana University Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc.IndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Health Information and CommunicationVeterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical CenterIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations