Advertisement

Drugs & Therapy Perspectives

, Volume 31, Issue 12, pp 437–440 | Cite as

Cellulite: no clear evidence that any type of treatment is effective

  • Adis Medical WritersEmail author
Disease Management

Abstract

The treatment of cellulite, a major cosmetic concern for many women, remains challenging. Although a number of studies have investigated the effects of a wide range of products/procedures on cellulite-related endpoints, most of these studies have important methodological flaws. At present, there is no clear clinical evidence that any evaluated treatments have good efficacy in reducing cellulite, with the most promising results shown with acoustic wave therapy.

Keywords

Thigh Circumference Collagenase Injection Connective Tissue Septum Standard Classification System Cosmetic Cream 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

This article was adapted from the American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2015;16(4):243–56 [1] by salaried employees of Adis/Springer, and was not supported by any external funding.

References

  1. 1.
    Luebberding S, Krueger N, Sadick NS. Cellulite: an evidence-based review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16(4):243–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emanuele E. Cellulite: advances in treatment: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31(6):725–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hexsel DM, Dal’forno T, Hexsel CL. A validated photonumeric cellulite severity scale. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(5):523–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turati F, Pelucchi C, Marzatico F, et al. Efficacy of cosmetic products in cellulite reduction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(1):1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adatto M, Adatto-Neilson R, Servant J-J, et al. Controlled, randomized study evaluating the effects of treating cellulite with AWT/EPAT. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(4):176–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russe-Wilflingseder K, Russe-Wilfingsleder K, Russe E, et al. Placebo controlled, prospectively randomized, double-blinded study for the investigation of the effectiveness and safety of the acoustic wave therapy (AWT®) for cellulite treatment. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2013;15(3):155–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knobloch K, Joest B, Krämer R, et al. Cellulite and focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy for non-invasive body contouring: a randomized trial. Dermatol Ther. 2013;3(2):143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bousquet-Rouaud R, Bazan M, Chaintreuil J, et al. High-frequency ultrasound evaluation of cellulite treated with the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009;11(1):34–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Truitt A, Elkeeb L, Ortiz A, et al. Evaluation of a long pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for improvement in appearance of cellulite. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2012;14(3):139–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson RF, Roche GC, Shanks SC. A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the ability of low-level laser therapy to improve the appearance of cellulite. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45(3):141–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smalls LK, Hicks M, Passeretti D, et al. Effect of weight loss on cellulite: gynoid lypodystrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(2):510–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lis-Balchin M. Parallel placebo-controlled clinical study of a mixture of herbs sold as a remedy for cellulite. Phytother Res. 1999;13(7):627–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Distante F, Bacci PA, Carrera M. Efficacy of a multifunctional plant complex in the treatment of the so-called “cellulite”: clinical and instrumental evaluation. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006;28(3):191–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kligman A, Pagnoni A, Stoudemayer T. Topical retinol improves cellulite. J Dermatol Treat. 1999;10(2):119–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lesser T, Ritvo E, Moy LS. Modification of subcutaneous adipose tissue by a methylxanthine formulation: a double-blind controlled study. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(6):455–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Bader T, Byrne A, Gillbro J, et al. Effect of cosmetic ingredients as anticellulite agents: synergistic action of actives with in vitro and in vivo efficacy. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012;11(1):17–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bertin C, Zunino H, Pittet JC, et al. A double-blind evaluation of the activity of an anti-cellulite product containing retinol, caffeine, and ruscogenine by a combination of several non-invasive methods. J Cosmet Sci. 2001;52(4):199–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collis N, Elliot LA, Sharpe C, et al. Cellulite treatment: a myth or reality: a prospective randomized, controlled trial of two therapies, endermologie and aminophylline cream. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(4):1110–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dupont E, Journet M, Oula M-L, et al. An integral topical gel for cellulite reduction: results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:73–88.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Epstein E, Young VL, Schorr M, et al. Prospective and randomized determination of the efficacy of topical lipolytic agents. Aesthetic Surg J. 1997;17(5):304–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mlosek RK, Dębowska RM, Lewandowski M, et al. Imaging of the skin and subcutaneous tissue using classical and high-frequency ultrasonographies in anti-cellulite therapy. Skin Res Technol. 2011;17(4):461–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roure R, Oddos T, Rossi A, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a topical cosmetic slimming product combining tetrahydroxypropyl ethylenediamine, caffeine, carnitine, forskolin and retinol, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2011;33(6):519–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sasaki GH, Oberg K, Tucker B, et al. The effectiveness and safety of topical PhotoActif phosphatidylcholine-based anti-cellulite gel and LED (red and near-infrared) light on Grade II-III thigh cellulite: a randomized, double-blinded study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9(2):87–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sparavigna A, Guglielmini G, Togni S, et al. Evaluation of anti-cellulite efficacy: a topical cosmetic treatment for cellulite blemishes: a multifunctional formulation. J Cosmet Sci. 2011;62(3):305–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vogelgesang B, Bonnet I, Godard N, et al. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of sulfo-carrabiose, a sugar-based cosmetic ingredient with anti-cellulite properties. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2011;33(2):120–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bagatin E, Miot HA, Soares JLM, et al. Long-wave infrared radiation reflected by compression stockings in the treatment of cellulite: a clinical double-blind, randomized and controlled study. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2013;35(5):502–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SpringerAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations