Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The PROMISING Project: A Pilot Study to Improve Geriatric Care Through a Pharmacist-Led Psychotropic Stewardship Program

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

Psychotropic medications are frequently prescribed during acute care, even in older patients. They represent a risk for inappropriate long-term use and increase the overall risk of morbidity and mortality in this population. Our project aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a psychotropic medication stewardship program led by pharmacists.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational pilot study in patients aged 75 years and older, admitted to a surgical unit with at least one active prescription of a psychotropic medication (antipsychotic, benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine receptor agonist). Each psychotropic medication was assessed for potential deprescription, and if eligible, a recommendation from the stewardship pharmacist was made to the medical team.

Results

Among 183 patients, 93.4% were eligible for a potential deprescription. A total of 298 prescriptions were evaluated by the stewardship pharmacists, of which 57.7% were antipsychotics, 22.8% were benzodiazepines and 19.5% were non-benzodiazepine receptor agonists. Most of the assessed prescriptions were started during current hospitalization (62.7%). The median time required for the intervention per patient was 17 min 30 s. The stewardship pharmacists made 192 suggestions for 258 eligible prescriptions, with 69.8% being deprescription recommendations. Of all the deprescription suggestions, 75.4% were accepted by the medical team and 84.8% of those accepted persisted at discharge.

Conclusion

The implementation of a pharmacist-led psychotropic medication stewardship program on surgical units in our hospital is feasible and is a promising approach to improve geriatric care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Woodward M. Hypnosedatives in the elderly. CNS Drugs. 1999. https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199911040-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Markota M, Rummans TA, Bostwick JM, Lapid MI. Benzodiazepine use in older adults: dangers, management, and alternative therapies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.07.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kate N, Pawar S, Parkar S, Sawant N. Adverse drug reactions due to antipsychotics and sedative-hypnotics in the elderly. J Geriatr Ment Health. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-9995.161377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider LS, Dagerman KS, Insel P. Risk of death with atypical antipsychotic drug treatment for dementia: meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. JAMA. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.15.1934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballard CG, Waite J, Birks J. Atypical antipsychotics for aggression and psychosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003476.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seppala LJ, Wermelink A, de Vries M, Ploegmakers KJ, van de Glind EMM, Daams JG, et al. Fall-risk-increasing drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis: II. Psychotropics. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.12.098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Panel BtAGSBCUE. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15767.

  8. Maust DT, Lin LA, Blow FC. Benzodiazepine use and misuse among adults in the United States. Psychiatr Serv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. NSW Therapeutic Advisory Group. Deprescribing tools. In: NSW Therapeutic Advisory Group Inc. 2021. https://www.nswtag.org.au/deprescribing-tools/. Accessed 10 Dec 2022.

  10. Cossette B, Bruneau MA, Couturier Y, Gilbert S, Boyer D, Ricard J, et al. Optimizing practices, use, care and services-antipsychotics (OPUS-AP) in long-term care centers in Québec, Canada: a strategy for best practices. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pottie K, Thompson W, Davies S, Grenier J, Sadowski CA, Welch V, et al. Deprescribing benzodiazepine receptor agonists: evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Phys. 2018;64(5):339–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bjerre LM, Farrell B, Hogel M, Graham L, Lemay G, McCarthy L, et al. Deprescribing antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and insomnia: evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Phys. 2018;64(1):17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies SJC, Jacob B, Rudoler D, Zaheer J, de Oliveira C, Kurdyak P. Benzodiazepine prescription in Ontario residents aged 65 and over: a population-based study from 1998 to 2013. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125317743651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scales DC, Fischer HD, Li P, Bierman AS, Fernandes O, Mamdani M, et al. Unintentional continuation of medications intended for acute illness after hospital discharge: a population-based cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3501-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Loh KP, Ramdass S, Garb JL, Brennan MJ, Lindenauer PK, Lagu T. From hospital to community: use of antipsychotics in hospitalized elders. J Hosp Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalisch Ellett LM, Pratt NL, Apajee J, Roughead EE. Initiation and continuation of antipsychotic medicines in older people following non-psychiatric hospital admission. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00866-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourcier E, Baptiste A, Borowik A, Zerbib L, Bonnet-Zamponi D, Tubach F, et al. Sedative-hypnotic initiation and renewal at discharge in hospitalized older patients: an observational study. BMC Geriatr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0972-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pollack LA, Srinivasan A. Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pellicano OA, Tong E, Yip G, Monk L, Loh X, Ananda-Rajah M, et al. Geriatric Psychotropic Stewardship Team to de-escalate inappropriate psychotropic medications in general medicine inpatients: an evaluation. Australas J Ageing. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kovacic NL, Gagnon DJ, Riker RR, Wen S, Fraser GL. An analysis of psychoactive medications initiated in the ICU but continued beyond discharge: a pilot study of stewardship. J Pharm Pract. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190019830518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haight RJ, Di Polito CN, Payne GH, Bostwick JR, Fulbright A, Lister JF, et al. Psychotropic stewardship: advancing patient care. Ment Health Clin. 2023. https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.04.036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner B, Filice GA, Drekonja D, Greer N, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in inpatient hospital settings: a systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1086/678057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Canadian Medication Appropriatement and Deprescribing Network. Deprescribing algorithms. In: The Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network. 2017. https://www.deprescribingnetwork.ca. Accessed 10 Dec 2022.

  24. Soni A, Thiyagarajan A, Reeve J. Feasibility and effectiveness of deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs: systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gosselin E, Simard M, Lunghi C, Sirois C. Trends in benzodiazepine and alternative hypnotic use in relation with multimorbidity among older adults in Quebec, Canada. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the clinical pharmacists on the surgical units who collaborated with the stewardship pharmacists during this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Dagenais-Beaulé.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Funding was granted by the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Montreal for statistical analyses.

Conflicts of interest

Marie d’Amours, Farah Ettis, Lauriane Ginefri, Johnny Lim and Angela-Sinlan Lin Poo Yuan, Jennifer Fontaine, Dana Wazzan and David Williamson declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Vincent Dagenais-Beaulé has received fees for consulting from Abbvie, HLS therapeutics and Otsuka for unrelated work, and speaker fees from Abbvie, HLS therapeutics, Ostuka and Jansen for unrelated work.

Availability of data and material

The data generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval

This study has been approved by the Quality, Transformation, Evaluation, Performance and Ethics Department of the CIUSSS West-Central Montreal. This quality improvement project falls under Article 2.5 of the TriCouncil Policy, statement 2, 2018 and therefore Research Ethics Board approval was not required. As quality improvement research, participants’ consent was not required and access to their charts was granted by the Director of Professional Services of the institution. Patients enrolled were assigned an identification number by the pharmacy at the time of inclusion. Confidential information was anonymized and kept in a secured electronic file protected by a password, solely accessible by the stewardship pharmacists leading the project. The file was destroyed at the end of follow-up to preserve patients’ confidentiality.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analyses were performed by Marie d’Amours, Farah Ettis, Lauriane Ginefri, Johnny Lim and Angela-Sinlan Lin Poo Yuan. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Marie d’Amours, Farah Ettis, Lauriane Ginefri, Johnny Lim and Angela-Sinlan Lin Poo Yuan. All authors commented and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for the work.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

40266_2023_1063_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file1 The supplementary information available online contains the following : (1) the trajectory of patients and prescriptions throughout the study, (2) additional characteristics of patients and prescriptions evaluated and (3) results of the sensitivity analyses not presented in this article. (PDF 881 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

d’Amours, M., Ettis, F., Ginefri, L. et al. The PROMISING Project: A Pilot Study to Improve Geriatric Care Through a Pharmacist-Led Psychotropic Stewardship Program. Drugs Aging 40, 1037–1045 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01063-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01063-z

Navigation