Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the G8 Screening Tool for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Received Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor plus Platinum–Etoposide Chemotherapy

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor plus platinum–etoposide chemotherapy is used as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), regardless of age.

Objective

We examined the role of the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool for evaluating treatment outcomes in patients with ES-SCLC treated with PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum–etoposide chemotherapy as first-line therapy.

Patients and Methods

Between September 2019 and October 2021, we prospectively evaluated patients with ES-SCLC treated with immunochemotherapy at ten institutions in Japan. The G8 score was assessed before treatment initiation.

Results

We evaluated 44 patients with ES-SCLC. Patients with G8 score > 11 had longer overall survival (OS) than those with G8 score ≤ 11 (not reached versus 8.3 months; log-rank test, p = 0.005). In univariate and multivariate analyses, G8 score > 11 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15–0.75; p = 0.008 and HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.14–0.82; p = 0.02, respectively) and performance status (PS) of 2 (HR 5.42; 95% CI 2.08–14.2; p < 0.001 and HR 6.94; 95% CI 2.25–21.4; p < 0.001, respectively) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Among patients with good PS (0 or 1), the OS in patients with G8 score > 11 was significantly longer than that in patients with G8 score ≤ 11 (not reached versus 12.3 months; log-rank test, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

G8 score evaluation before treatment initiation was useful as a prognostic factor for ES-SCLC patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors and platinum–etoposide chemotherapy, even with good PS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, Read W, Tierney R, Vlahiotis A, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4539–44. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gazdar AF, Bunn PA, Minna JD. Small-cell lung cancer: what we know, what we need to know and the path forward. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:725–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farago AF, Keane FK. Current standards for clinical management of small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018;7:69–79. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2018.01.16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Byers LA, Rudin CM. Small cell lung cancer: where do we go from here? Cancer. 2015;121:664–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horn L, Mansfield AS, Szczęsna A, Havel L, Krzakowski M, Hochmair MJ, et al. First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2220–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1809064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu SV, Reck M, Mansfield AS, Mok T, Scherpereel A, Reinmuth N, et al. Updated overall survival and PD-L1 subgroup analysis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide (IMpower133). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:619–30. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Paz-Ares L, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, Reinmuth N, Hotta K, Trukhin D, et al. Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (Caspian): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1929–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32222-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pallis AG, Shepherd FA, Lacombe D, Gridelli C. Treatment of small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients. Cancer. 2010;116:1192–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiono A, Imai H, Wasamoto S, Tsuda T, Nagai Y, Minemura H, et al. Real-world data of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2023;12:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morimoto K, Yamada T, Takeda T, Shiotsu S, Date K, Harada T, et al. Efficacy and safety of programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage SCLC: a prospective observational study. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022;3:100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Morimoto K, Yamada T, Yokoi T, Kijima T, Goto Y, Nakao A, et al. Clinical impact of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2021;161:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.08.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, Topinkova E, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Extermann M, et al. International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2595–603. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8347.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Mertens C, Delva F, Fonck M, et al. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2166–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi M, Takahashi M, Komine K, Yamada H, Kasahara Y, Chikamatsu S, et al. The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: a retrospective, single institutional study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0179694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jespersen E, Winther SB, Minet LR, Möller S, Pfeiffer P. Frailty screening for predicting rapid functional decline, rapid progressive disease, and shorter overall survival in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy—a prospective, clinical study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021;12:578–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Walree IC, Scheepers E, van Huis-Tanja L, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Bellera C, Soubeyran P, et al. A systematic review on the association of the G8 with geriatric assessment, prognosis and course of treatment in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10:847–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morimoto K, Uchino J, Yokoi T, Kijima T, Goto Y, Nakao A, et al. Impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcome of combined chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Oncoimmunology. 2021;10:1950411. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1950411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shiotsu S, Yoshimura A, Yamada T, Morimoto K, Tsuchiya M, Yoshioka H, et al. Pembrolizumab monotherapy for untreated PD-L1-Positive non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly or those with poor performance status: a prospective observational study. Front Oncol. 2022;12:904644. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.904644.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Youn B, Trikalinos NA, Mor V, Wilson IB, Dahabreh IJ. Real-world use and survival outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2020;126:978–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Agemi Y, Shimokawa T, Sasaki J, Miyazaki K, Misumi Y, Sato A, et al. Prospective evaluation of the G8 screening tool for prognostication of survival in elderly patients with lung cancer: a single-institution study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Schulkes KJG, Souwer ETD, van Elden LJR, Codrington H, van der Sar-van der Brugge S, Lammers JJ, et al. Prognostic value of geriatric 8 and identification of seniors at risk for hospitalized patients screening tools for patients with lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18:660-666.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2017.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Couderc AL, Tomasini P, Nouguerède E, Rey D, Correard F, Montegut C, et al. Older patients treated for lung and thoracic cancers: unplanned hospitalizations and overall survival. Clin Lung Cancer. 2021;22:e405–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, Meza R, Kong CY, Cronin KA, et al. The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:640–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1916623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:489–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedlaender A, Liu SV, Passaro A, Metro G, Banna G, Addeo A. The role of performance status in small-cell lung cancer in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21:e539–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.04.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Masubuchi K, Imai H, Wasamoto S, Tsuda T, Minemura H, Nagai Y, et al. Post-progression survival after atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer has a significant impact on overall survival. Thorac Cancer. 2022;13:2776–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients, their families, and all the investigators involved in this study. Additionally, we thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for their help with the English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadaaki Yamada.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Tadaaki Y received grants from Pfizer, Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and personal fees from Eli Lilly. KT received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013), and the study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (ERB-C-1580), and each participating hospital and was registered at the University Medical Hospital Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000044048).

Consent to Participate

All patients provided written informed consent.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available because of ethical constraints but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable

Authors Contributions

KM and Tadaaki Y contributed to the study conception and design. KM, TT, SS, KD, TH, NT, YC, YT, Takahiro Y, HK, and Masaki I obtained the clinical data. Data were interpreted by KM, Tadaaki Y, Masaki I, AY, Masahiro I, ST, YHK, and KT. The manuscript was prepared by KM, Tadaaki Y, and KT. The final version of the manuscript was read and approved by all the authors.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 974 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morimoto, K., Yamada, T., Takeda, T. et al. Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the G8 Screening Tool for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Received Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor plus Platinum–Etoposide Chemotherapy. Drugs Aging 40, 563–571 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01034-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01034-4

Navigation