Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Safety Considerations of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors in the Older Population Living with HIV

  • Therapy in Practice
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are approximately 40 million people living with HIV globally, and 21% (7.9 million) are older adults (aged > 50 years) as of 2019. The average age of HIV-positive patients is predicted to increase to 58 by 2035. The favorable clinical efficacy of integrase strand transfer inhibitors has led to high rates of viral suppression and have now become the preferred agents by the AIDS guideline when initiating antiretroviral therapy. There are concerns of increasing adverse effects from HIV medications, such as integrase strand transfer inhibitors, as a result of changes in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters within the older population. The authors aim to describe the safety concerns of the current integrase strand transfer inhibitors based upon a narrative literature review, including recommendations for drug–drug interactions, and relevant comorbidities to consider for selection of the most appropriate integrase strand transfer inhibitor for older people living with HIV. Raltegravir is a well-tolerated option with minor adverse events; however, adherence to a twice-daily regimen may be difficult in older patients who are also taking many other medications for various comorbidities. Elvitegravir is also well tolerated with limited adverse effects, but has many drug–drug interactions that may pose problems for older patients with polypharmacy. Dolutegravir has been associated with more frequent adverse events, such as neuropsychiatric disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HIVinfo.NIH.gov. HIV/AIDS: the basics. Reviewed September 24, 2020. https://hivinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv/fact-sheets/hivaids-basics. Accessed 4 Feb 2021.

  2. UNAIDS. Global HIV & AIDS statistics-2020 fact sheet. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet. Accessed 4 Feb 2021.

  3. CDC. HIV and older Americans. Updated September 14, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/age/olderamericans/index.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2021.

  4. Smit M, Cassidy R, Cozzi-Lepri A, et al. Projections of non-communicable disease and health care costs among HIV-positive persons in Italy and the U.S.A.: a modelling study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2021.

  6. Turnheim K. When drug therapy gets old: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the elderly. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38(8):843–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0531-5565(03)00133-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly. Drug Metab Rev. 2009;41(2):67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602530902722679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangoni AA, Jackson SH. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57(1):6–14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.02007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer DB. The effect of age on thymic function. Front Immunol. 2013;4:316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Li T, Wu N, Dai Y, et al. Reduced thymic output is a major mechanism of immune reconstitution failure in HIV-infected patients after long-term antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(9):944–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoen JC, Erlandson KM, Anderson PL. Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in older persons. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2013;9(5):573–88. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2013.781153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mangoni AA. The impact of advancing age on P-glycoprotein expression and activity: current knowledge and future directions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2007;3:315–20. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.3.3.315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elliot ER, Wang X, Singh S, et al. Increased dolutegravir peak concentrations in people living with human immunodeficiency virus aged 60 and over, and analysis of sleep quality and cognition. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(1):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Podany AT, Scarsi KK, Fletcher CV. Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(1):25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0424-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Back D, Marzolini C. The challenge of HIV treatment in an era of polypharmacy. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(2): e25449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Glassock RJ, Winearls C. Ageing and the glomerular filtration rate: truths and consequences. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2009;120:419–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Raltegravir. Prescribing information. Merck & Co., Inc. Revised 7/2020. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=cbd3e1af-81f3-44f6-8e45-652deab7a508. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.

  18. Rockstroh JK, DeJesus E, Lennox JL, STARTMRK Investigators, et al. Durable efficacy and safety of raltegravir versus efavirenz when combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: final 5-year results from STARTMRK. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(1):77–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828ace69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Calcagno A, D’Avolio A, Bonora S. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of raltegravir and experience from clinical trials in HIV-positive patients. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11(7):1167–76. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2015.1056732.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vera JH, Jackson A, Dickinson L, et al. The pharmacokinetic profile of raltegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected individuals over 60 years of age. HIV Clin Trials. 2015;16(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1179/1528433614Z.0000000006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Calza L, et al. Plasma trough concentrations of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir in older patients with HIV-1 infection. HIV Med. 2017;18(7):474–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Elzi L, Erb S, Furrer H, et al. Adverse events of raltegravir and dolutegravir. AIDS. 2017;31(13):1853–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steigbigel RT, Cooper DA, Teppler H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of raltegravir combined with optimized background therapy in treatment-experienced patients with drug-resistant HIV infection: week 96 results of the BENCHMRK 1 and 2 phase III trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(4):605–12. https://doi.org/10.1086/650002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Santinelli L, et al. Real word outcomes associated with use of raltegravir in older people living with HIV: results from the 60 months follow-up of the RAL-age cohort. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18(5):485–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1733415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pavone P, et al. Long-term treatment with raltegravir is associated with lower triglycerides and platelets count in the older HIV+ population: results from the Ral-Age Study. Curr HIV Res. 2017;15(5):355–60. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570162X15666170927124558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lennox JL, Dejesus E, Berger DS, et al. Raltegravir versus efavirenz regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy, durability, subgroup, safety, and metabolic analyses [published correction appears in J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58(4):e120. Dosage error in article text]. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181da1287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Naumann U, Moll A, Schleehauf D, et al. Similar efficacy and tolerability of raltegravir-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients, irrespective of age group, burden of comorbidities and concomitant medication: real-life analysis of the German ‘WIP’ cohort [published correction appears in Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28(7):738]. Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28(9):893–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416679550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kobayashi S, et al. A case of under-dosing after raltegravir formulation change in an elderly patient treated for HIV. Pharmazie. 2019;74(1):62–3. https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2019.8788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shimura K, Kodama E, Sakagami Y, et al. Broad antiretroviral activity and resistance profile of the novel human immunodeficiency virus integrase inhibitor elvitegravir (JTK-303/GS-9137). J Virol. 2008;82(2):764–74. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01534-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Genvoya. Prescribing information. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Revised 12/2018. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=34784acf-15ed-4715-b504-eb30430518e9. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.

  31. Stribild. Prescribing information. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Revised 11/2018. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=d52f7766-068f-4a2f-b748-356ff60450f7. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.

  32. Zolopa A, Sax PE, DeJesus E, et al. A randomized double-blind comparison of coformulated elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 96 results. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(1):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e318289545c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. DeJesus E, Rockstroh JK, Henry K, et al. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379:2429–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mills A, Garner W, Pozniak A, et al. Patient-reported symptoms over 48 weeks in a randomized, open-label, phase IIIb non-inferiority trial of adults with HIV switching to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF versus continuation of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with emtricitabine and tenofovir DF. Patient. 2015;8(4):359–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0129-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sax PE, Wohl D, Yin MT, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: two randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9987):2606–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cottrell ML, Hadzic T, Kashuba AD. Clinical pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and drug-interaction profile of the integrase inhibitor dolutegravir. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52(11):981–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-013-0093-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dolutegravir. Prescribing information. ViiV Healthcare Company. Revised 6/2020. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=63df5af3-b8ac-4e76-9830-2dbb340af922. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.

  38. Llibre JM, Hung CC, Brinson C, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for the maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies [published correction appears in Lancet. 2018 Feb 1]. Lancet. 2018;391(10123):839–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33095-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Courlet P, et al. Pharmacokinetic profiles of boosted darunavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine in aging people living with HIV. AIDS. 2020;34(1):103–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Calcagno A, et al. Older age is associated with higher dolutegravir exposure in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of people living with HIV. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021;60(1):103–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-020-00916-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoffmann C, Welz T, Sabranski M, et al. Higher rates of neuropsychiatric adverse events leading to dolutegravir discontinuation in women and older patients. HIV Med. 2017;18(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Biktarvy. Prescribing information. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Revised 8/2019. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=664cb8f0-1f65-441b-b0d9-ba3d798be309. Accessed 15 Feb 2021.

  43. Stader F, et al. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling combined with Swiss HIV cohort study data supports no dose adjustment of bictegravir in elderly individuals living with HIV. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Orkin C, DeJesus E, Sax PE, et al. Fixed-dose combination bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir-containing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: week 144 results from two randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(6):e389-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30099-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Maggiolo F, et al. Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed people with HIV aged ≥ 65 years: week 48 results of a phase 3b, open-label trial. Infect Dis Ther. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-021-00419-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Iwuji CC, Churchill D, Bremner S, et al. A phase IV randomised, open-label pilot study to evaluate switching from protease-inhibitor based regimen to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide single tablet regimen in integrase inhibitor-naïve, virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected adults harbouring drug resistance mutations (PIBIK study): study protocol for a randomised trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):524. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05240-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rossetti B, et al. Neurological monitoring in patients switching from dolutegravir based regimen to bictegravir based regimen (DOBINeuro). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04155554. Updated January 31, 2020. Accessed 22 Feb 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Marie Gavioli.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was provided for the writing of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

EG is an employee of Dompé U.S. Inc. All other authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author contributions

EV and EG conceived the presented idea. EV performed the literature analysis. EG verified the literature analysis. EV and EG wrote the manuscript and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vider, E., Gavioli, E.M. Clinical Safety Considerations of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors in the Older Population Living with HIV. Drugs Aging 38, 967–975 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-021-00894-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-021-00894-y

Navigation