Skip to main content

Clinical Assessment and Management of Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Review of Current Evidence and Focus on Pharmacological Treatment

Drugs & Aging volume 36, pages 203–211 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Foot and ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling problem that adversely affects physical function and significantly reduces quality of life. Although the knee was considered to be the lower-limb site most often affected by OA, recent population data showed foot OA is as prevalent as knee OA, and rates increase with advancing years. The most common foot OA sites include the first metatarsophalangeal joint and the midfoot, with the ankle affected less often. Despite the high prevalence and disabling nature of foot and ankle OA, the condition has been neglected by clinical researchers, and there are very few trials investigating non-surgical foot or ankle OA treatment options. There are no accepted clinical diagnostic criteria for foot or ankle OA so imaging remains common. Clinical guidelines based on knee and hip OA research recommend education, exercise, and weight loss in the first instance. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or capsaicin may be used as an adjunct. Failing these approaches, acetaminophen (paracetamol) should be recommended; however, if there is inadequate symptomatic relief, then clinicians should trial an oral NSAID or a cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor. Given that adverse events and co-morbidities are common in the elderly, older patients should be closely monitored. Some studies have investigated intra-articular injections for foot and ankle OA, and there is some evidence to suggest hyaluronic acid may be effective in the short term for ankle OA. With the lack of research on foot or ankle OA treatments, however, robust clinical trials are urgently needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

49,54 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araújo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011;19(11):1270–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy L, Helmick CG. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: a population-health perspective: a population-based review of the fourth most common cause of hospitalization in U.S. adults. Orthop Nurs. 2012;31(2):85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UK National Joing Registry (NJR). 12th annual report: 2015. Hemel Hempstead: NJR; 2015.

  4. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roddy E, Thomas MJ, Marshall M, Rathod T, Myers H, Menz HB, et al. The population prevalence of symptomatic radiographic foot osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional findings from the clinical assessment study of the foot. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halstead J, Chapman GJ, Gray JC, Grainger AJ, Brown S, Wilkins RA, et al. Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(4):987–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas MJ, Peat G, Rathod T, Marshall M, Moore A, Menz HB, et al. The epidemiology of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray CL, Marshall M, Rathod T, Menz H, Roddy E. Population prevalence and distribution of ankle pain and symptomatic radiographic ankle osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults [abstract no. 043]. Rheumatol. 2016;55(suppl_1):79.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saltzman CL, Salamon ML, Blanchard GM, Huff T, Hayes A, Buckwalter JA, et al. Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consecutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopaedic center. Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:44–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Menz HB, Lord SR. Foot pain impairs balance and functional ability in community-dwelling older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91(5):222–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR. Foot and ankle risk factors for falls in older people: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(8):866–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergin SM, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Nikolopoulos N, Menz HB. Impact of first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis on health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(11):1691–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paterson KL, Hinman RS, Hunter DJ, Wrigley TV, Bennell KL. Impact of concurrent foot pain on health and functional status in people with knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67(7):989–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paterson KL, Kasza J, Hunter DJ, Hinman RS, Menz HB, Peat G, et al. The relationship between foot and ankle symptoms and risk of developing knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017;25(5):639–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paterson KL, Kasza J, Hunter DJ, Hinman RS, Menz HB, Peat G, et al. Longitudinal association between foot and ankle symptoms and worsening of symptomatic radiographic knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017;25(9):1407–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Menz HB, Jordan KP, Roddy E, Croft PR. Characteristics of primary care consultations for musculoskeletal foot and ankle problems in the UK. Rheumatol. 2010;49(7):1391–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Windt DAWM, Dunn KM, Spies-Dorgelo MN, Mallen CD, Blankenstein AH, Stalman WAB. Impact of physical symptoms on perceived health in the community. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64(3):265–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sayre EC, Li LC, Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Bar S, Cibere J. The effect of disease site (knee, hip, hand, foot, lower back or neck) on employment reduction due to osteoarthritis. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arthritis and Osteoporosis Victoria. A problem worth solving. The rising cost of musculoskeletal conditions in Australia. Elsternwick: Arthritis and Osteoporosis Victoria; 2013.

  20. Menz HB, Munteanu SE, Landorf KB, Zammit GV, Cicuttini FM. Radiographic evaluation of foot osteoarthritis: sensitivity of radiographic variables and relationship to symptoms. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(3):298–303.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rathod T, Marshall M, Thomas MJ, Menz HB, Myers HL, Thomas E, et al. Investigations of potential phenotypes of foot osteoarthritis: cross-sectional analysis from the clinical assessment study of the foot. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(2):217–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall M, Nicholls E, Kwok W-Y, Peat G, Kloppenburg M, van der Windt D, et al. Erosive osteoarthritis: a more severe form of radiographic hand osteoarthritis rather than a distinct entity? Annals Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):136–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang W, Doherty M, Peat G, Bierma-Zeinstra MA, Arden NK, Bresnihan B, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):483–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Golightly YM, Hannan MT, Dufour AB, Hillstrom HJ, Jordan JM. Foot disorders associated with overpronated and oversupinated foot function: the Johnston County osteoarthritis project. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(11):1159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagedorn TJ, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Menz HB, Casey VA, et al. Foot disorders, foot posture, and foot function: the Framingham Foot Study. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74364.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gates LS, Bowen CJ, Arden NK. Clinical measures of musculoskeletal foot and ankle assessment: an international consensus statement. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015;5(2):91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hannan MT, Zimmer J, Sullivan E, Kiel DP. Physical limitations and foot disorders in elders. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(4):S22.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roddy E, Myers H, Thomas MJ, Marshall M, D’Cruz D, Menz HB, et al. The clinical assessment study of the foot (CASF): study protocol for a prospective observational study of foot pain and foot osteoarthritis in the general population. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011;4(1):22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas MJ, Roddy E, Rathod T, Marshall M, Moore A, Menz HB, et al. Clinical diagnosis of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(12):2094–101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Menz HB, Roddy E, Marshall M, Thomas MJ, Rathod T, Myers H, et al. Demographic and clinical factors associated with radiographic severity of first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(1):77–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Menz HB, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Landorf KB. Foot structure and function in older people with radiographic osteoarthritis of the medial midfoot. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(3):317–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zammit GV, Munteanu SE, Menz HB. Development of a diagnostic rule for identifying radiographic osteoarthritis in people with first metatarsophalangeal joint pain. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011;19(8):939–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Paterson KL, Hinman RS, Menz HB, Bennell KL. The ABC foot study: an international, multi-phase, mixed methods study of the assessment of beliefs and clinical practice for managing first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis [abstract no. 599]. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018;26(Suppl. 1):S320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sakellariou G, Conaghan PG, Zhang W, Bijlsma JWJ, Boyesen P, D’Agostino MA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the clinical management of peripheral joint osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(9):1484–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Matsos M, Harish S, Zia P, Ho Y, Chow A, Ioannidis G, et al. Ultrasound of the hands and feet for rheumatological disorders: influence on clinical diagnostic confidence and patient management. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38(11):1049–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Paterson KL, Harrison C, Britt H, Hinman RS, Bennell KL. Management of foot/ankle osteoarthritis by Australian general practitioners: an analysis of national patient-encounter records. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018;26(7):888–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trivedi B, Marshall M, Belcher J, Roddy E. A systematic review of radiographic definitions of foot osteoarthritis in population-based studies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(8):1027–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cicuttini FM, Spector TD. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis of the hand. Rev Rhum Malad Engl Ed. 1995;62(6):3S–8S.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Spector T, Hart D, Byrne J, Harris P, Dacre J, Doyle D. Definition of osteoarthritis of the knee for epidemiological studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52(11):790.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA. Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(7):1034–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Menz HB, Munteanu SE, Landorf KB, Zammit GV, Cicuttini FM. Radiographic classification of osteoarthritis in commonly affected joints of the foot. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007;15(11):1333–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kraus VB, Kilfoil TM, Hash T II, McDaniel G, Renner JB, Carrino JA, et al. Atlas of radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the ankle and hindfoot. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(12):2059–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. National Clinical Guideline Centre. Osteoarthritis: care and management in adults. Clinical guideline CG177. Methods, evidence and recommendations. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014.

  45. McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(3):363–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guideline for the management of knee and hip osteoarthritis. 2nd ed. East Melbourne: RACGP; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JWJ, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG, et al. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1125–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Roberts E, Nunes VD, Buckner S, Latchem S, Constanti M, Miller P, et al. Paracetamol: not as safe as we thought? A systematic literature review of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(3):552–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, Pinheiro MB, Lin C-WC, Day RO et al. Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ. 2015;350:h1225.

  50. Zeng C, Wei J, Persson MS, Sarmanova A, Doherty M, Xie D, et al. Relative efficacy and safety of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(10):642–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Persson MSM, Stocks J, Walsh DA, Doherty M, Zhang W. The relative efficacy of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and capsaicin in osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018;26(12):1575–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jennings MB, Alfieri DM. A controlled comparison of etodolac and naproxen in osteoarthritis of the foot. Lower Extremity. 1997;4(1):43–8.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jennings M. Comparison of piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1994;84(7):348–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Da Costa BR, Reichenbach S, Keller N, Nartey L, Wandel S, Jüni P, et al. Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2017;390(10090):e21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vannabouathong C, Del Fabbro G, Sales B, Smith C, Li CS, Yardley D, et al. Intra-articular injections in the treatment of symptoms from ankle arthritis: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(10):1141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cohen MM, Altman RD, Hollstrom R, Hollstrom C, Sun C, Gipson B. Safety and efficacy of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan®) in a randomized, double-blind study for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(7):657–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. DeGroot HI, Uzunishvili S, Weir R, Al-omari A, Gomes B. Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid is not superior to saline solution injection for ankle arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Jt Surg. 2012;94(1):2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Karatosun V, Unver B, Ozden A, Ozay Z, Gunal I. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid compared to exercise therapy in osteoarthritis of the ankle. A prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26(2):288–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Salk R, Chang T, D’Costa W, Soomekh D, Grogan K. Viscosupplementation (hyaluronans) in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2005;22(4):585–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun S-F, Hsu C-W, Lin H-S, Chou Y-J, Chen J-Y, Wang J-L. Efficacy of intraarticular botulinum toxin A and intraarticular hyaluronate plus rehabilitation exercise in patients with unilateral ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7(1):9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Menz HB, Landorf KB, Handley CJ, Elzarka A, et al. Effectiveness of intra-articular hyaluronan (Synvisc, hylan G-F 20) for the treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(10):1838–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pons M, Alvarez F, Solana J, Viladot R, Varela L. Sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of hallux rigidus. A single-blind, randomized study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Protheroe D, Gadgil A. Guided intra-articular corticosteroid injections in the midfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(8):1001–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Drakonaki EE, Kho JS, Sharp RJ, Ostlere SJ. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided steroid injections for pain management of midfoot joint degenerative disease. Skelet Radiol. 2011;40(8):1001–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Shamus J, Shamus E, Gugel RN, Brucker BS, Skaruppa C. The effect of sesamoid mobilization, flexor hallucis strengthening, and gait training on reducing pain and restoring function in individuals with hallux limitus: a clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(7):368–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Menz HB, Auhl M, Tan JM, Levinger P, Roddy E, Munteanu SE. Effectiveness of foot orthoses versus rocker-sole footwear for first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis: randomized trial. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(5):581–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ibuki A, Cornoiu A, Clarke A, Unglik R, Beischer A. The effect of orthotic treatment on midfoot osteoarthritis assessed using specifically designed patient evaluation questionnaires. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(4):461–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Rao S, Baumhauer JF, Becica L, Nawoczenski DA. Shoe inserts alter plantar loading and function in patients with midfoot arthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(7):522–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wilder FV, Barrett JP Jr, Farina EJ. Effect of regular exercise on the radiographic progression of foot osteoarthritis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95(4):342–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Menz HB, Jordan KP, Roddy E, Croft PR. Musculoskeletal foot problems in primary care: what influences older people to consult? Rheumatol. 2010;49(11):2109–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Kade L. Paterson

  2. Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport Exercise and Osteoarthritis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Lucy Gates

Authors
  1. Kade L. Paterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucy Gates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kade L. Paterson.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of Interest

Kade Paterson and Lucy Gates declare they have no conflicts of interest relating to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paterson, K.L., Gates, L. Clinical Assessment and Management of Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Review of Current Evidence and Focus on Pharmacological Treatment. Drugs Aging 36, 203–211 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-019-00639-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-019-00639-y