Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Interventions to Optimise Prescribing in Older People with Dementia: A Systematic Review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Older adults living with dementia may have a higher risk of medication toxicity than those without dementia. Optimising prescribing in this group of people is a critically important yet challenging process.

Objective

Our aim was to systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions for optimising prescribing in older people with dementia.

Methods

This systematic review searched the Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library electronic databases for studies that evaluated relevant interventions. Experimental, quasi-experimental and observational studies published in English prior to August 2018 were included. Data were synthesised at a narrative level.

Results

The 18 studies accepted for review included seven randomised, two nonrandomised controlled, five quasi-experimental and four observational studies. Half the studies were conducted in nursing homes and the other half in hospital and community settings. There was great variability in the interventions and outcomes reported and a meta-analysis was not feasible. The three randomised and four nonrandomised studies examining medication appropriateness all reported improvements on at least one measure of the outcome. Six studies reported on interventions that identified and resolved drug-related problems. The results for other outcomes, including the number of medications (10 studies), healthcare utilisation (7 studies), mortality (7 studies), quality of life (3 studies) and falls (3 studies), were mixed and difficult to synthesise because of variability in the study design and measures used.

Conclusion

Emerging evidence suggests that interventions in older people with dementia may have positive effects on medication appropriateness and resolution of drug-related problems; however, whether optimisation of medication results in clinically meaningful outcomes remains uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guideline Adaptation Committee. Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia. Sydney: Guideline Adaptation Committee; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reeve E, Bell SJ, Hilmer SN. Barriers to optimising prescribing and deprescribing in older adults with dementia: a narrative review. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2015;10(3):168–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Page A, Etherton-Beer C, Seubert LJ, Clark V, King S, Clifford RM. Medication use to manage comorbidities for people with dementia: a systematic review. J Pharm Pract Res. 2018;48:356–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Dementia. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs362/en/. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.

  5. Andersen F, Viitanen M, Halvorsen DS, Straume B, Engstad TA. Co-morbidity and drug treatment in Alzheimer’s disease. A cross sectional study of participants in the Dementia Study in Northern Norway. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11(1):58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bunn F, Burn A-M, Goodman C, Rait G, Norton S, Robinson L, et al. Comorbidity and dementia: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Med. 2014;12:192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clague F, Mercer SW, McLean G, Reynish E, Guthrie B. Comorbidity and polypharmacy in people with dementia: insights from a large, population-based cross-sectional analysis of primary care data. Age Ageing. 2017;46(1):33–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kristensen RU, Norgaard A, Jensen-Dahm C, Gasse C, Wimberley T, Waldemar G. Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication in people with dementia: a nationwide study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(1):383–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Somers M, Rose E, Simmonds D, Whitelaw C, Calver J, Beer C. Quality use of medicines in residential aged care. Aust Fam Phys. 2010;39(6):413.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuijpers MA, Van Marum RJ, Egberts AC, Jansen PA. Relationship between polypharmacy and underprescribing. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(1):130–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan ECK, Jokanovic N, Koponen MPH, Thomas D, Hilmer SN, Bell SJ. Prevalence of analgesic use and pain in people with and without dementia or cognitive impairment in aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2015;10(3):194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons C. Polypharmacy and inappropriate medication use in patients with dementia: an underresearched problem. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017;8(1):31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lau DT, Mercaldo ND, Harris AT, Trittschuh E, Shega J, Weintraub S. Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use among community-dwelling elders with dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010;24(1):56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnell K. Inappropriate drug use in people with cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2015;10(3):178–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Redston MR, Hilmer SN, McLachlan AJ, Clough AJ, Gnjidic D. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in older inpatients with and without cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(4):1639–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramsey CM, Gnjidic D, Agogo GO, Allore H, Moga D. Longitudinal patterns of potentially inappropriate medication use following incident dementia diagnosis. Alzheimers Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2018;4:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bosboom PR, Alfonso H, Almeida OP, Beer C. Use of potentially harmful medications and health-related quality of life among people with dementia living in residential aged care facilities. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra. 2012;2(1):361–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Renom-Guiteras A, Thurmann PA, Miralles R, Klaassen-Mielke R, Thiem U, Stephan A, et al. Potentially inappropriate medication among people with dementia in eight European countries. Age Ageing. 2018;47(1):68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh KA, O’Riordan D, Kearney PM, Timmons S, Byrne S. Improving the appropriateness of prescribing in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacists’ interventions in secondary care. Age Ageing. 2016;45(2):201–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Page A, Potter K, Clifford R, McLachlan AJ, Etherton-Beer C. Medication appropriateness tool for co-morbid health conditions in dementia: consensus recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert panel. Intern Med J. 2016;46(10):1189–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reeve E, Trenaman SC, Rockwood K, Hilmer SN. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in older people with dementia. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017;13(6):651–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007;297(11):1233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alldred DP, Raynor DK, Hughes C, Barber N, Chen T, Spoor P. Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009095.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGrattan M, Ryan C, Barry HE, Hughes CM. Interventions to improve medicines management for people with dementia: a systematic review. Drugs Aging. 2017;34(12):907–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alldred DP, Kennedy MC, Hughes C, Chen TF, Miller P. Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009095.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper JA, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, Kerse N, Bradley MC, Ryan C, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clyne B, Fitzgerald C, Quinlan A, Hardy C, Galvin R, Fahey T, et al. Interventions to address potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(6):1210–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patterson SM, Cadogan CA, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Bradley MC, Ryan C, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shafiee Hanjani L, Long D, Peel N, Peeters G, Freeman C, Hubbard R. Interventions to optimise prescribing in older people with dementia. PROSPERO 2017 (CRD42017073358). http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017073358. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.

  31. Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, Koch GG, Mitchell CM, Phillips CD. Validation of the minimum data set cognitive performance scale: agreement with the mini-mental state examination. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50(2):M128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Coon JT, Abbott R, Rogers M, Whear R, Pearson S, Lang I, et al. Interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotic medications in people with dementia resident in care homes: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(10):706–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. National Institutes of Health. Quality assessment tool for before-after (pre-post) studies with no control group. Systematic evidence reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: University of Ottawa; 2001. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.

  37. Gustafsson M, Sjölander M, Pfister B, Jonsson J, Schneede J, Lövheim H. Pharmacist participation in hospital ward teams and hospital readmission rates among people with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73:827–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Potter K, Flicker L, Page A, Etherton-Beer C. Deprescribing in frail older people: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jordan S, Gabe-Walters ME, Watkins A, Humphreys I, Newson L, Snelgrove S, et al. Nurse-led medicines’ monitoring for patients with dementia in care homes: a pragmatic cohort stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0140203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pitkälä KH, Juola A-L, Kautiainen H, Soini H, Finne-Soveri UH, Bell JS, et al. Education to reduce potentially harmful medication use among residents of assisted living facilities: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(12):892–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zermansky AG, Alldred DP, Petty DR, Raynor DK, Freemantle N, Eastaugh J, et al. Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly people living in care homes—randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2006;35(6):586–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Crotty M, Halbert J, Rowett D, Giles L, Birks R, Williams H, et al. An outreach geriatric medication advisory service in residential aged care: a randomised controlled trial of case conferencing. Age Ageing. 2004;33(6):612–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Furniss L, Burns A, Craig SKL, Scobie S, Cooke J, Faragher B. Effects of a pharmacist’s medication review in nursing homes. Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176:563–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sakakibara M, Igarashi A, Takase Y, Kamei H, Nabeshima T. Effects of prescription drug reduction on quality of life in community-dwelling patients with dementia. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;18(5):705–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Garfinkel D, Zur-Gil S, Ben-Israel J. The war against polypharmacy: a new cost-effective geriatric-positive approach for improving drug therapy in disabled elderly people. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9(6):430–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jordan S, Gabe M, Newson L, Snelgrove S, Panes G, Picek A, et al. Medication monitoring for people with dementia in care homes: the feasibility and clinical impact of nurse-led monitoring. Sci World J. 2014;2014:843621.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ghibelli S, Marengoni A, Djade CD, Nobili A, Tettamanti M, Franchi C, et al. Prevention of inappropriate prescribing in hospitalized older patients using a computerized prescription support system (INTERcheck®). Drugs Aging. 2013;30(10):821–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lang PO, Vogt-Ferrier N, Hasso Y, Le Saint L, Dramé M, Zekry D, et al. Interdisciplinary geriatric and psychiatric care reduces potentially inappropriate prescribing in the hospital: interventional study in 150 acutely ill elderly patients with mental and somatic comorbid conditions. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(4):406.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Garfinkel D, Mangin D. Feasibility study of a systematic approach for discontinuation of multiple medications in older adults: addressing polypharmacy. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(18):1648–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Halvorsen KH, Ruths S, Granas AG, Viktil KK. Multidisciplinary intervention to identify and resolve drug-related problems in Norwegian nursing homes. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28(2):82–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Poudel A, Peel NM, Mitchell CA, Gray LC, Nissen LM, Hubbard RE. Geriatrician interventions on medication prescribing for frail older people in residential aged care facilities. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brunet NM, Sevilla-Sánchez D, Novellas JA, Jané CC, Gómez-Batiste X, McIntosh J, et al. Optimizing drug therapy in patients with advanced dementia: a patient-centered approach. Eur Geriatr Med. 2014;5(1):66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Saad M, Harisingani R, Katinas L. Impact of geriatric consultation on the number of medications in hospitalized older patients. Consult Pharm. 2012;27(1):42–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chan VT, Woo BK, Sewell DD, Allen EC, Golshan S, Rice V, et al. Reduction of suboptimal prescribing and clinical outcome for dementia patients in a senior behavioral health inpatient unit. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(1):195–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gustafsson M, Sjolander M, Pfister B, Schneede J, Lovheim H. Effects of pharmacists’ interventions on inappropriate drug use and drug-related readmissions in people with dementia: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacy (Basel). 2018;6(1):E7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pfister B, Jonsson J, Gustafsson M. Drug-related problems and medication reviews among old people with dementia. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;18(1):52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land. Lancet. 2002;359(9300):57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Reeve E, Farrell B, Thompson W, Herrmann N, Sketris I, Magin P, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for deprescribing cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. Sydney: The University of Sydney; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Millar AN, Daffu-O’Reilly A, Hughes CM, Alldred DP, Barton G, Bond CM, et al. Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness trials aimed at optimising prescribing in older adults in care homes. Trials. 2017;18(1):175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Christine Dalais (The University of Queensland Library) for her help with the development of the search strategy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Leila Shafiee Hanjani, Nancye M. Peel & Ruth E. Hubbard

  2. Department of Pharmacy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia

    Duncan Long

  3. Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

    Geeske Peeters

  4. Centre for Optimising Pharmacy Practice-based Excellence in Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Christopher R. Freeman

  5. PA-Southside Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Ruth E. Hubbard

Authors
  1. Leila Shafiee Hanjani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Duncan Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nancye M. Peel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Geeske Peeters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christopher R. Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruth E. Hubbard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leila Shafiee Hanjani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Leila Shafiee Hanjani, Duncan Long, Nancye M. Peel, Geeske Peeters, Christopher R. Freeman and Ruth E. Hubbard declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

Leila Shafiee Hanjani is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP), and Geeske Peeters is supported by a fellowship from the Global Brain Health Institute. This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership Centre for Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People (Grant no. GNT9100000). No other sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 114 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shafiee Hanjani, L., Long, D., Peel, N.M. et al. Interventions to Optimise Prescribing in Older People with Dementia: A Systematic Review. Drugs Aging 36, 247–267 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0620-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0620-9

Search

Navigation