Advertisement

Drugs & Aging

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 569–574 | Cite as

Time in Therapeutic Range of Oral Vitamin K Antagonists in Hospitalized Elderly Patients

  • Laurent Lafarge
  • Fouzi Khayi
  • Anis Bel-Kamel
  • Nicolas Charhon
  • Laura Sarfati
  • Benoit Falquet
  • Michel Ducher
  • Laurent Bourguignon
Original Research Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are commonly used in older adults. To ensure the efficiency and safety of these drugs, the international normalized ratio (INR) must be monitored. The time in therapeutic range (TTR) is an internationally recommended assessment of the anticoagulation quality.

Objective

Our study aimed to assess the TTR of VKAs in a hospitalized geriatric population and identify factors associated with low TTR.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective study of data from 1899 patients with a mean age of 87 years between 2013 and 2015 in the geriatric units of four French hospitals. The data collection consisted of 2450 VKA prescriptions. We excluded prescriptions with a duration of < 7 days, monitoring with fewer than two INR values and patients with prosthetic heart valves. TTR was assessed using the Rosendaal method. Factors associated with a low TTR (< 50%) were assessed using a non-parametric method.

Results

The mean TTR observed in this population was 42.6%. The TTR was < 50% for 62.5% of the patients included in this study. Significant associations were found between TTR < 50% and aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALT), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prescription duration, fluconazole instauration, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Conclusions

Both our results and those in the literature indicate that TTR in geriatric populations is lower than that in the general population. Most patients had an insufficient TTR, exposing them to an increased risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. These data provide a perspective on poor-quality anticoagulation and illustrates the difficulty of using VKAs in geriatric patients.

Notes

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: LL, FK, AB-K, NC, LS, BF, MD, LB. Analysis and interpretation of data: LL, FK, LB, MD. Preparation, revision, and approval of the manuscript: LL, FK, ABK, NC, LS, BF, MD, LB.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

LL, FK, AB-K, NC, LS, BF, MD, and LB have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Funding

No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Kazemian P, Oudit G, Jugdutt BI. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure in the elderly. Heart Fail Rev. 2012;17(4–5):597–613.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98(10):946–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(11):e101–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129(8):837–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2016;50(5):e1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Kennedy J, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Safavi-Naeini P, Saeed M. Target-specific oral anticoagulants: should we switch from warfarin? Tex Heart Inst J. 2015;42(3):229–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montastruc JL, Rousseau V, Chebane L, Abadie D, Bondon-Guitton E, Durrieu G, et al. Hemorrhagic effects of oral anticoagulants: a comparative study between vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOA). Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71(10):1283–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vitry AI, Roughead EE, Ramsay EN, Preiss AK, Ryan P, Gilbert AL, et al. Major bleeding risk associated with warfarin and co-medications in the elderly population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(10):1057–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singer DE, Hellkamp AS, Piccini JP, Mahaffey KW, Lokhnygina Y, Pan G, et al. Impact of global geographic region on time in therapeutic range on warfarin anticoagulant therapy: data from the ROCKET AF clinical trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(1):e000067.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee J, Lee B, Kim K, Ahn H, Suh O, Lee M, et al. Factors affecting warfarin therapy following cardiac valve surgery. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36(12):1845–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rouaud A, Hanon O, Boureau A-S, Chapelet G, Chapelet GG, de Decker L. Comorbidities against quality control of VKA therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a French national cross-sectional study. PloS One. 2015;10(3):e0119043.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ageno W, Gallus AS, Wittkowsky A, Crowther M, Hylek EM, Palareti G, et al. Oral anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e44S–88S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okumura K, Komatsu T, Yamashita T, Okuyama Y, Harada M, Konta Y, et al. Time in the therapeutic range during warfarin therapy in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation A multicenter study of its status and infuential factors. Circ J Off J Jpn Circ Soc. 2011;75(9):2087–94.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shao X-H, Yang Y-M, Zhu J, Zhang H, Liu Y, Gao X, et al. Comparison of the clinical features and outcomes in two age-groups of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1335–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):2071–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lehto M, Niiranen J, Korhonen P, Mehtälä J, Khanfir H, Hoti F, et al. Quality of warfarin therapy and risk of stroke, bleeding, and mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the nationwide FinWAF Registry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(6):657–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Insam C, Méan M, Limacher A, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Aschwanden M, Banyai M, et al. Anticoagulation management practices and outcomes in elderly patients with acute venous thromboembolism: a clinical research study. PloS One. 2016;11(2):e0148348.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mant J, Hobbs FDR, Fletcher K, Roalfe A, Fitzmaurice D, Lip GYH, et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2007;370(9586):493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, Briët E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69(3):236–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ducher M, Cerutti C, Gustin MP, Paultre CZ. Statistical relationships between systolic blood pressure and heart rate and their functional significance in conscious rats. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994;32(6):649–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    White HD, Gruber M, Feyzi J, Kaatz S, Tse H-F, Husted S, et al. Comparison of outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin therapy according to anticoagulant control: results from SPORTIF III and V. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):239–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gallagher AM, Setakis E, Plumb JM, Clemens A, van Staa T-P. Risks of stroke and mortality associated with suboptimal anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(5):968–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cotté F-E, Benhaddi H, Duprat-Lomon I, Doble A, Marchant N, Letierce A, et al. Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Time in Therapeutic Range in Four European Countries. Clin Ther. 2014;36(9):1160–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wallentin L, Lopes RD, Hanna M, Thomas L, Hellkamp A, Nepal S, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin at different levels of predicted international normalized ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2013;127(22):2166–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chan P-H, Li W-H, Hai J-J, Chan EW, Wong ICK, Tse H-F, et al. Time in therapeutic range and percentage of international normalized ratio in the therapeutic range as a measure of quality of anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(10):1247.e23–8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Walraven C, Jennings A, Oake N, Fergusson D, Forster AJ. Effect of study setting on anticoagulation control: a systematic review and metaregression. Chest. 2006;129(5):1155–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ritschel WA. Handbook of basic pharmacokinetic, including clinical applications. Hamilton: Drug Intelligence Publications; 1986.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wolfgang RA, Ritschel WA. Gerontokinetics: pharmacokinetics of drugs in the elderly. 1st edn. Telford:Telford Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Walraven C, Austin PC, Oake N, Wells P, Mamdani M, Forster AJ. The effect of hospitalization on oral anticoagulation control: a population-based study. Thromb Res. 2007;119(6):705–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Debeij J, Cannegieter SC, van Zaane B, van Zanten AP, Rosendaal FR, Gerdes VEA, et al. Major Haemorrhage during Vitamin K antagonist treatment: the influence of thyroid hormone levels. Eur Thyroid J. 2014;3(1):32–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Esmon CT. The interactions between inflammation and coagulation. Br J Haematol. 2005;131(4):417–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shea MK, Cushman M, Booth SL, Burke GL, Chen H, Kritchevsky SB. Associations between vitamin K status and haemostatic and inflammatory biomarkers in community-dwelling adults. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost. 2014;112(3):438–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wittkowsky AK, Devine EB. Frequency and causes of overanticoagulation and underanticoagulation in patients treated with warfarin. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24(10):1311–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Davis NJ, Billett HH, Cohen HW, Arnsten JH. Impact of adherence, knowledge, and quality of life on anticoagulation control. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(4):632–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schmitt L, Speckman J, Ansell J. Quality assessment of anticoagulation dose management: comparative evaluation of measures of time-in-therapeutic range. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003;15(3):213–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vanerio G. International normalized ratio variability: a measure of anticoagulation quality or a powerful mortality predictor. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc. 2015;24(10):2223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jones C, Pollit V, Fitzmaurice D, Cowan C. Guideline Development Group. The management of atrial fibrillation: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;348:g3655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Lafarge
    • 1
  • Fouzi Khayi
    • 1
  • Anis Bel-Kamel
    • 1
  • Nicolas Charhon
    • 2
  • Laura Sarfati
    • 2
  • Benoit Falquet
    • 1
  • Michel Ducher
    • 1
    • 3
  • Laurent Bourguignon
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Pierre Garraud, Service pharmacieLyonFrance
  2. 2.Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Service PharmacieLyonFrance
  3. 3.EMR 3738, Faculté de médecine Lyon-sud, Université Lyon 1LyonFrance
  4. 4.UMR CNRS 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie EvolutiveUniversité Lyon 1LyonFrance
  5. 5.ISPB-Faculté de pharmacie, Université Lyon 1LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations