Skip to main content
Log in

The EURO-FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) List: International Consensus Validation of a Clinical Tool for Improved Drug Treatment in Older People

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 July 2018

This article has been updated



Drug treatment of older people is still potentially inappropriate in many cases as multimorbidity and related polypharmacy are highly prevalent. To increase the quality of drug treatment in older people, the FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) List (first version 2012) was developed in a Delphi consensus procedure and updated (FORTA2015) by 21 experts from Germany and Austria. It has been validated in a randomized, controlled, prospective trial demonstrating significant improvement in the quality of drug treatment and clinical endpoints (VALFORTA).


Based on these results, Delphi consensus validations (two rounds) of country/region-specific FORTA Lists were conducted in the UK/Ireland, France, Poland, Italy, Spain, the Nordic countries and The Netherlands. An algorithm based on geriatric/pharmacologic expertise, publications and professional position was used to find experts in the field.


Forty-seven experts agreed to participate in the Delphi process (return rate of 97.9%). For each country/region, the overall mean consensus coefficient (deviation from the initiator proposal) was > 0.9. FORTA Lists from six countries/regions with a minimum of four participating experts (excluding The Netherlands) plus the original FORTA List were collated into the EURO-FORTA List containing 264 items in 26 main indication groups. Two drugs had to be added to the proposed items, as proposed by at least four countries/regions; none had to be removed.


This project produced seven new country/region-specific FORTA Lists, as well as the overarching EURO-FORTA List showing a high consensual level based on a broader expert base. EURO-FORTA should help to spread the FORTA approach and improve geriatric pharmacotherapy internationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 02 July 2018

    In the original publication of this article, the members of the FORTA group were provided in such a way that they could not be indexed as collaborators on PubMed. The article should have included an Acknowledgement section as shown below.


  1. World Population Ageing 2015. United Nations, New York, 2015. Accessed 19 Jul 2017.

  2. An aging nation: the older population in the United States. United States Census Bureau. Accessed 19 Jul 2017.

  3. Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mc Namara KP, Breken BD, Alzubaidi HAT, et al. Health professional perspectives on the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy for older patients in Australia. Age Ageing. 2017;46:291–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watts G. Why the exclusion of older people from clinical research must stop. BMJ. 2012;344:e3445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clegg A, Relton C, Young J, et al. Improving recruitment of older people to clinical trials: use of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design. Age Ageing. 2015;44:547–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shenoy P, Harugeri A. Elderly patients’ participation in clinical trials. Perspect Clin Res. 2015;6:184–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wehling M. Drug therapy for the elderly. Vienna: Springer; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Wehling M. Guideline-driven polypharmacy in elderly, multimorbid patients is basically flawed: there are almost no guidelines for these patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59:376–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beers MH. Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly. An update. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1531–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society updated beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;2015(63):2227–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Page RL, Ruscin JM. The risk of adverse drug events and hospital-related morbidity and mortality among older adults with potentially inappropriate medication use. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006;4:297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper JA, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wehling M. Older people, a plethora of drugs, and drug list approaches: useful, efficacious, or a waste of time? J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:1073–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wehling M. Drug therapy in the elderly: too much or too little, what to do? A new assessment system: fit for the aged FORTA [in German]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008;133:2289–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuhn-Thiel AM, Weiss C, Wehling M. Consensus validation of the FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) List: a clinical tool for increasing the appropriateness of pharmacotherapy in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2014;31:131–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pazan F, Weiss C, Wehling M. The FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) List 2015: update of a validated clinical tool for improved pharmacotherapy in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2016;33:447–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wehling M, Burkhardt H, Kuhn-Thiel A, et al. VALFORTA: a randomised trial to validate the FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) classification. Age Ageing. 2016;45:262–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fialova D, Topinkova E, Gambassi G, et al. Potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly home care patients in Europe. JAMA. 2005;293:1348–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Renom-Guiteras A, Meyer G, Thürmann PA. The EU(7)-PIM list: a list of potentially inappropriate medications for older people consented by experts from seven European countries. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71:861–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pastor Cano J, Aranda Garcia A, Gascon Canovas JJ, et al. Spanish adaption of Beers criteria [in Spanish]. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2015;38:375–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. EUROSTAT. Accessed 19 Jul 2017.

  24. The Nordic Gerontological Federation (NGF). Accessed 19 Jul 2017.

  25. WEB OF SCIENCETM. Accessed 19 Jul 2017.

  26. . Accessed 19 Jul 2017.

  27. O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, et al. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2015;44:213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Connor MN, O’Sullivan D, Gallagher PF, et al. Prevention of hospital-acquired adverse drug reactions in older people using screening tool of older persons’ prescriptions and screening tool to alert to right treatment criteria: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:1558–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Wehling.

Ethics declarations


No sources of funding were received for this project or for the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

M.W. was employed by AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, as director of discovery medicine (=translational medicine) from 2003 to 2006, while on sabbatical leave from his professorship at the University of Heidelberg. Since returning to this position in January 2007, he has received lecturing and consulting fees from Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers, Daichii-Sankyo, Lilly, Otsuka, Novo-Nordisk, Berlin-Chemie, Shire and LEO Pharma. F.P. and C.W. have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

The FORTA initiators/expert panel members are listed in electronic supplementary material 2–10.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pazan, F., Weiss, C., Wehling, M. et al. The EURO-FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) List: International Consensus Validation of a Clinical Tool for Improved Drug Treatment in Older People. Drugs Aging 35, 61–71 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: