Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Infection in Venous Leg Ulcers: Considerations for Optimal Management in the Elderly

Drugs & Aging volume 33, pages 87–96 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Venous leg ulcers are the most common cause of chronic leg wounds, accounting for up to 70 % of all chronic leg ulcers and carrying with them a significant morbidity, especially for elderly patients. Among people aged 65 years and older, the annual prevalence is 1.7 %. Billions of dollars per year are spent caring for patients with these often difficult-to-heal and sometimes recurrent chronic wounds. Chronic non-healing wounds of the lower extremities are susceptible to microbial invasion and can lead to serious complications, such as delayed healing, cellulitis, enlargement of wound size, debilitating pain, and deeper wound infections causing systemic illness. Recognition and treatment of the infected venous leg ulcer is an essential skill set for any physician caring for geriatric patients. Most physicians rely on subjective clinical signs and patient-reported symptoms in the evaluation of infected chronic wounds. The conventional bacterial culture is a widely available tool for the diagnosis of bacterial infection but can have limitations. Systemic antibiotics, as well as topical antiseptics and antibiotics, can be employed to treat and control infection and critical colonization. Better understanding of microbial biofilms in the wound environment have caused them to emerge as an important reason for non-healing and infection due to their increased resistance to antimicrobial, immunological, and chemical attack. A sound understanding of the microbial–host environment and its complexities, as well as the pathophysiology of venous hypertension, must be appreciated to understand the need for a multimodality approach to treating an infected venous leg ulcer. Other treatment measures are often required, in addition to systemic and topical antibiotics, such as the application of wound bandages, compression therapy, and wound debridement, which can hasten clearance of the infection and help to promote healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Baker SR, Stacey MC, Jopp-McKay AG, Hoskin SE, Thompson PJ. Epidemiology of chronic venous ulcers. Br J Surg. 1991;78:864–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Venous and non-venous leg ulcers: clinical history and appearance in a population study. Br J Surg. 1994;81:182–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Margolis DJ, Bilker W, Santanna J, Baumgarten M. Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:381–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbade LP, Lastória S. Venous ulcer: epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44(6):449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Ruckley CV. Chronic ulcer of the leg: clinical history. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294(6584):1389–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergqvist D, Lindholm C, Nelzén O. Chronic leg ulcers: the impact of venous disease. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29(4):752–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ravaghi H, Flemming K, Cullum N, Olyaee Manesh A. Electromagnetic therapy for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2:CD002933.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Callam M. Prevalence of chronic leg ulceration and severe chronic venous disease in Western countries. Phlebology. 1992;7:S6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Dale JJ. Chronic ulceration of the leg: extent of the problem and provision of care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;290(6485):1855–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruckley CV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology. 1997;48(1):67–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Smith PDC, Nicolaides AN, Boisseau MR, Eklof B. Mechanisms of disease: chronic venous disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:488–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44(3):401–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Etufugh CN, Phillips TJ. Venous ulcers. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(1):121–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brem H, Kirsner RS, Falanga V. Protocol for the successful treatment of venous ulcers. Am J Surg. 2004;188:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Falanga V, et al. Venous ulceration. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993;19:764–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gourdin FW, Smith JG. Etiology of venous ulceration. South Med J. 1993;86:1142–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:401–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Falanga V, Eaglstein WH. The trap hypothesis of venous ulceration. Lancet. 1993;341:1006–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burnand KG, O’Donnell TF, Thomas ML, Browse NL. The relative importance of incompetent communicating veins in the production of varicose veins and venous ulcers. Surgery. 1977;82:9–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arnoldi CC. Venous pressure in patients with valvular incompetence of the veins of the lower limb. Acta Chir Scand. 1966;132:628–45.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Raju S, Fredericks R. Valve reconstruction procedures for non-obstructive venous insufficiency: rationale, techniques and results in 107 procedures with 2- to 8-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:301–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Falanga V. Venous ulceration. Wounds. 1996;8:102–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Browse NL, Burnand KG. The cause of venous ulceration. Lancet. 1982;2:243–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Higley HR, Ksander G, Gerhardt C, Kirsner R, Falanga V. Immunohistochemical analysis of growth factor and growth factor response cells in chronic venous stasis ulcers. Wounds. 1992;4:33–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Higley HR, Ksander G, Gerhardt C, Falanga V. Extravasation of macromolecules and possible trapping of transforming growth factor-B in venous ulceration. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:79–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas PR, Nash GB, Dormandy JA. White cell accumulation in dependent legs of patients with venous hypertension: a possible mechanism for trophic changes in the skin. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296:1693–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coleridge-Smith PD, Thomas P, Scurr JH, Dormandy JA. Causes of venous ulceration: a new hypothesis? Br Med J. 1988;296:1726–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scott TE, LaMorte WW, Gorin DR, Menzoian JO. Risk factors for chronic venous insufficiency: a dual case-control study. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:622–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Falanga V. Venous ulcers: new treatment for an old disease. Veterans Health Syst J. 1998;July/August:41-48.

  30. Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Leg ulcer etiology—a cross sectional population study. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14:557–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zbinen O, Morselli B, Jager K, Widmer LK. Long-term evolution of varicose veins-11 year follow-up. Fifth European-American Symposium on Venous Diseases. 7–11 Nov 1990; Vienna.

  32. Hoare MC, Nicolaides AN, Miles CR, Shull K, Jury RP, Needham T, et al. The role of primary varicose veins in venous ulceration. Surgery. 1982;92:450–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Langer RD, Ho E, Denenberg JO, et al. Relationships between symptoms and venous disease: the San Diego population study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1420–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Criqui MH, Jamosmos M, Fronek A, et al. Chronic venous disease in an ethnically diverse population: the San Diego population study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:448–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Margolis DJ, Knauss J, Bilker W. Medical conditions associated with venous leg ulcers in an outpatient. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:267–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Collins L, Seraj S. Diagnosis and treatment of venous ulcers. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(8):989–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Phillips TJ, Dover JS. Leg ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25(6):965–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McGee SR, Boyko EJ. Physical examination and chronic lower-extremity ischemia: a critical review. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(12):1357–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Scriven JM, Hartshorne T, Bell PR, Naylor AR, London NJ. Single-visit venous ulcer assessment clinic: the first year. Br J Surg. 1997;84(3):334–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lopez A, Phillips T. Venous ulcers. Wounds. 1998;10(5):149–57.

    Google Scholar 

  41. O’Mera S, Cullum NA, Nelson EA. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD000265.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Margolis D, Gross E, Wood CR, et al. Planimetric rate of healing in venous ulcers of the leg treated with pressure bandage and hydrocolloid dressing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28:418–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tallman P, Muscare E, Carson P, et al. Initial rate of healing predicts complete healing of venous ulcers. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1231–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kantor J, Margolis DJ. A multicentre study of percentage change in venous leg ulcer as a prognostic index of healing at 24 weeks. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:960–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Dale JJ. Chronic ulceration of the leg: extent of the problem and provision of care. Br Med J. 1985;290:1855–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Ruckley CV. Chronic ulcer of the leg: clinical history. Br Med J. 1986;294:1389–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Falanga V. Venous ulceration: assessment, classification and management. In: Krasner D, Kane D, editors. Chronic wound care. 2nd ed. Wayne (PA): Health Management Publications; 1997. p. 165–71.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ruckley CV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology. 1997;48:67–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nelson EA, Bell-Syer SE. Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD002303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Landis SJ. Chronic wound infection and antimicrobial use. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008;21:531–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tammelin A, Lindholm C, Hambraeus A. Chronic ulcers and antibiotic treatment. J Wound Care. 1998;7:435–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Walker JT, Percival SL. Control of biofouling in drinking water systems. In: Walker JT, Surman S, Jess J, editors. Industrial biofouling: detection, prevention and control, vol. 1. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2001. p. 103–21.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Percival SL, Thomas JG, Williams DW. The world of microbiology and biofilmology. In: Percival SL, Cutting K, editors. Microbiology of wounds. London: CRC Press; 2010. p. 1–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Percival SL, Rogers AA. The significance and role of biofilms in chronic wounds. In: McBain A, Allison D, Pratten J, Spratt D, Upton M, Verran J, editors. Biofilms, persistence and ubiquity. Cardiff: Bioline; 2005. p. 171–80.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Percival SL, Kite P, Stickler D. The use of urinary catheters and control of biofilms using TEDTA. Urol Res. 2009;37:205–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Percival SL, et al. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds. Wound Rep Reg. 2012;20:647–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wolcott R, Dowd S. The role of biofilms: are we hitting the right target? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:36S–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Percival SL, Bowler P. The potential significance of biofilms in wounds. Wounds. 2004;16:234–40.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD, Dowd SE. Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation. J Wound Care. 2008;17:333–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Jensen PØ, Madsen KG, Phipps R, Krogfelt K, et al. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Singh VA, Barbul A. Bacterial biofilms in wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:167–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:1140–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bates-Jensen BM, Schultz G, Ovington LG. Management of exudate, biofilms, and infection. In: Sussman C, Bates-Jensen B, editos. Wound care: a collaborative practice manual for health professionals. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 457–476.

  65. Bowler PG, Davies BJ. The microbiology of acute and chronic wounds. Wounds. 1999;11:72–8.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bowler PG. The 105 bacterial growth guideline: reassessing its clinical relevance in wound healing. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49(1):44–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Bamberg R, Sullivan PK, Conner-Kerr T. Diagnosis of wound infections: current culturing practices of US wound care professionals. Wounds. 2002;14:314–28.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Robson MC, et al. Wound care guidelines of the Wound Healing Society: guidelines for the treatment of venous ulcers. Wound Rep Regen. 2006;14:649–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. O’Donnell TF, et al. Mangement of venous leg ulcers: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:3S–59S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Association for the Advancement of Wound Care (AAWC) venous ulcer guideline. http://aawconline.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/AAWC-Venous-Ulcer-Guideline-Update+Algorithm-v28-updated-11Feb2014.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2015.

  71. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of chronic venous leg ulcers. http://sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/120/index.html. Accessed 14 Aug 2015.

  72. Kelechi TJ, Johnson JJ. Guideline for the management of wounds in patients with lower-extremity venous disease: an executive summary. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2012;39(6):598–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bowler PG, Davies BJ. The microbiology of infected and non-infected leg ulcers. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38:573–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bowler PG. The anaerobic and aerobic microbiology of wounds, a review. Wounds. 1998;10:170–8.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Levine NS, et al. The quantitative swab culture and smear: a quick simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds. J Trauma. 1976;16(2):89–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Panuncialman J, Hammerman S, Carson P, Falanga V. Wound edge biopsy sites in chronic wounds heal rapidly and do not result in delayed overall healing of the wounds. Wound Rep Reg. 2010;18:21–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong DG. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Micro Rev. 2001;14(2):244–69.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Davies CE, Hill KE, Newcombe RG, Stephens P, Wilson MJ, Harding KG, et al. A prospective study of the microbiology of chronic venous leg ulcers to reevaluate the clinical predictive value of tissue biopsies and swabs. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15:17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Saltzman CL, Hillis SL, Park H, Scherubel M. Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection. Wound Rep Reg. 2006;14:548–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Stotts NA. Determination of bacterial burden in wounds. Adv Wound Care. 1995;8:28–52.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Davies CE, Hill KE, Wilson MJ, et al. Use of 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for analysis of the microfloras of healing and nonhealing chronic venous leg ulcers. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3549–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gardner SE, Hillis SL, Heilmann K, Segre JA, Grice EA. The neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer microbiome is associated with clinical factors. Diabetes. 2013;62:923–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Melendez JH, Frankel YM, An AT, et al. Real-time PCR assays compared to culture-based approaches for identification of aerobic bacteria in chronic wounds. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;16:1762–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, Dowd SE. Comparison of culture and molecular identification of bacteria in chronic wounds. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:2535–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Tuttle MS, Mostow E, Mukherjee P, et al. Characterization of bacterial communities in venous insufficiency wounds by use of conventional culture and molecular diagnostic methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3812–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Grice EA, Segre JA. Interaction of the microbiome with the innate immune response in chronic wounds. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;946:55–68.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Percival SL, Dowd S. The microbiology of wounds. In: Percival SL, Cutting K, editors. Microbiology of wounds. London: CRC Press; 2010. p. 187–218.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  88. Tuttle MS. Association between microbial bioburden and healing outcomes in venous leg ulcers: a review of the evidence. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, Pulcini E, Secor P, Sestrich J, et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wounds Repair Regen. 2008;16:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Bartlett JG, Sullivan-Sigler N, Louie TJ, Gorbach SL. Anaerobes survive in clinical specimens despite delayed processing. J Clin Microbiol. 1976;3:133–6.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bowler PG. The prevalence and significance of anaerobic bacteria in wounds [thesis]. Cardiff: University of Wales, College of Medicine; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Hardin WD, Aran AJ, Smith JW, Nichols RL. Aerotolerance of common anaerobic bacteria—fact or fantasy? South Med J. 1982;75:1015–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Loesche WJ. Oxygen sensitivity of various anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1969;18:723–7.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Leake JL, Dowd SE, Wolcott RD, Zischkau AM. Identification of yeast in chronic wounds using new pathogen-detection technologies. J Wound Care. 2009;18:103–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Secor PR, et al. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Price LB, Liu CM, Melendez JH, et al. Community analysis of chronic wound bacteria using 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing: impact of diabetes and antibiotics on chronic wound microbiota. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6462.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. O’Meara S, Al-Kurdi D, Ologun Y, Ovington LG. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD003557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Kilburn SA, Featherstone P, Higgins B, Brindle R. Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:CD004299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Khawcharoenporn T, Tice A. Empiric outpatient therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cephalexin, or clindamycin for cellulitis. Am J Med. 2010;123:942–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Brook I, Frazier EH. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of wounds and cutaneous abscesses. Arch Surg. 1990;125:1445–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Hansson C, Hoborn J, Moller A, Swanbeck G. The microbial flora in venous leg ulcers without clinical signs of infection. Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh). 1995;75:24–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. O’Meara S, Al-Kurdi D, Ologun Y, et al. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD003557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. O’Meara S, et al. Topical and systemic antimicrobial therapy for venous leg ulcers. JAMA. 2014;311(24):2534–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Wolcott RD, Kennedy JP, Dowd SE. Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2009;18:54–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Steed DL. Debridement. Am J Surg. 2004;187:S71–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Williams D, Enoch S, Miller D, Harris K, Price P, Harding KG. Effect of sharp debridement using curette on recalcitrant nonhealing venous leg ulcers: a concurrently controlled, prospective cohort study. Wound Rep Reg. 2005;13:131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Wilcox JR, et al. Frequency of debridements and time to heal: a retrospective cohort study of 312, 744 wounds. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(9):1050–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Michaels JA, Campbell B, King B, Palfreyman SJ, Shackley P, Stevenson M. Randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of silver-donating antimicrobial dressings for venous leg ulcers (VULCAN trial). Br J Surg. 2009;96:1147–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Tang JC, Marston WA, Kirsner RS. Wound Healing Society (WHS) venous ulcer treatment guidelines: what’s new in five years? Wound Rep Reg. 2012;20:619–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Fonder MA, Lazarus GS, et al. Treating the chronic wound: a practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:185–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. De Mattei M, Ongaro A, Magaldi S, Gemmati D, Legnaro A, Palazzo A, et al. Time- and dose-dependent effects of chronic wound fluid on human adult dermal fibroblasts. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:347–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. McMullen D. Topical metronidazole, part II. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1992;38(3):42–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Madhusudan VL. Efficacy of 1 % acetic acid in the treatment of chronic wounds infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Wound J. doi:10.1111/iwj.12428 (Epub 8 Apr 2015).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Medical Arts Building, Suite 106, 51 North 39th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Douglas J. Pugliese

Authors
  1. Douglas J. Pugliese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas J. Pugliese.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Douglas Pugliese has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

No funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pugliese, D.J. Infection in Venous Leg Ulcers: Considerations for Optimal Management in the Elderly. Drugs Aging 33, 87–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-016-0343-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-016-0343-8

Keywords

search

Navigation