Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Patients on Admission and Discharge from an Older Peoples’ Unit of an Acute UK Hospital

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) classifies 65 common drug issues found to contribute to inappropriate prescribing in the elderly. International studies using STOPP criteria indicate high potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prevalence rates; however, no studies have been conducted in older patients in UK hospitals. Published literature has not assessed whether prescribers attempt to minimise the potential risk of PIMs by putting in place follow-up or review plans.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were (1) to determine prevalence and types of PIMs in older people admitted to and discharged from a UK hospital; and (2) to determine how often PIMs prescribed on discharge are accompanied by a plan for follow-up.

Methods

This was a retrospective, non-randomised study conducted in the Specialist Health and Ageing Unit (HAU) of a 950-bed acute hospital trust in England, UK. The subjects were patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the HAU in June and July 2011. Data were obtained by applying STOPP criteria to electronic admission and discharge medication lists. Parametric and non-parametric tests were performed to assess variables and to detect differences between groups. A PIM index was calculated by dividing the total number of PIMs by the total number of medications.

Results

Medication lists for 195 patients were assessed. Median age was 85.5 years. The median number of admission medicines was nine. A total of 66 patients (34 %) were prescribed more than ten medications. The median number of discharge medicines was ten, with 80 patients (41 %) prescribed more than ten medicines. Admission PIM prevalence was 26.7 % (95 % CI 20.5–32.9; 52 patients, 74 PIMs). The most common PIM categories on admission were central nervous system (CNS) and psychotropic drugs, drugs adversely affecting patients at risk of falls and drugs acting on the urogenital system. The likelihood of having a PIM on admission was doubled in patients receiving more than ten medications compared with those taking fewer (odds ratio 2.3 [95 % CI 1.2–4.4]; p = 0.01). Discharge PIM prevalence was 22.6 % (95 % CI 16.7–28.5; 44 patients, 51 PIMs). PIMs reduced significantly on discharge (p = 0.005). The most common discharge PIMs were drugs adversely affecting patients at risk of falls, CNS and psychotropics, urogenital drugs and cardiovascular agents. Advice for general practitioners to monitor medication was documented on the discharge summary of three patients. An index was developed, based on the ratio of PIMs to medication totals. The PIM index complements the assessment of PIM prevalence and allows comparison of prescribing appropriateness between populations and between studies by taking into account the total amount of prescribed medication. Despite an increase in medication prescribed, the PIM index (rate) decreased from 0.043 on admission to 0.027 at discharge.

Conclusions

Admission to a specialist HAU was associated with a significant reduction in PIMS. Very few patients discharged with a PIM had a documented follow-up plan. PIM prevalence was lower than published rates found internationally. Similar studies in settings of varying types across the UK are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milton JC, Hill-Smith I, Jackson SHD. Prescribing for older people. BMJ. 2008;336:606–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, et al. Prescribing in elderly people 1: appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007;370:173–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, et al. Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2003;164:2716–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Ruby CM, et al. Suboptimal prescribing in older inpatients and outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(2):200–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimitrow MS, Airaksinen MSA, Kivelä S-L, et al. Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(8):1521–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo R, Scullin C, Mullan AM, Scott MG, McElnay JC. Comparison of tools for the assessment of inappropriate prescribing in hospitalized older people. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(6):1196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corsonello A, Pranno L, Garasto S, et al. Potentially inappropriate medication in elderly hospitalized patients. Drug Aging. 2009;26(Suppl. 1):31–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang C-B, Chan D-C. Comparison of published explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate medications in older adults. Drug Aging. 2010;27(12):947–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, et al. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallagher P, Baeyens J-P. Inter-rater reliability of STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria amongst physicians in six European countries. Age Ageing. 2009;38(5):603–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallagher P, Lang PO, Cherubini A, et al. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in an acutely ill population of older patients admitted to six European hospitals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(11):1175–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing. 2008;37(6):673–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton H, Gallagher P, Ryan C, et al. Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria and the risk of adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(11):1013–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miquel MDC, Cuervo MS, Silveira ED, et al. Potentially inappropriate drug prescription in older subjects across health care settings. Eur Geriatr Med. 2010;1(1):9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cahir C, Fahey T, Teeling M, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a national population study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(5):543–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan C, O’Mahony D, Kennedy J, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in an Irish elderly population in primary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68(6):936–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laroche M-L, Charmes J-P, Nouaille Y, et al. Impact of hospitalization in an acute medical geriatric unit on potentially inappropriate medication use. Drug Aging. 2006;23(1):49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zuckerman IH, Hernandez JJ, Gruber-Baldini AL, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing before and after nursing home admission among patients with and without dementia. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005;3(4):246–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bakken MS, Ranhoff AH, Engeland A, et al. Inappropriate prescribing for older people admitted to an intermediate-care nursing home unit and hospital wards. Scand J Prim Health. 2012;30(3):169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barnett K, McCowan C, Evans JMM, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of use of potentially inappropriate medicines in older people: cohort study stratified by residence in nursing home or in the community. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(3):275–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Rosenthal GE, et al. Polypharmacy and prescribing quality in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(10):1516–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parsons C, Johnston S, Mathie E, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people with dementia in care homes. Drug Aging. 2012;29(2):143–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rancourt C, Moisan J, Baillargeon L, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescriptions for older patients in long-term care. BMC Geriatr. 2004;4:9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lang PO, Hasso Y, Dramé M, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing including under-use amongst older patients with cognitive or psychiatric co-morbidities. Age Ageing. 2010;39(3):373–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Emily Knight and Ewa Maryniak for their contribution to data collection, and Professor David Taylor for his helpful comments. No sources of funding were used to assist in the conduct of this study or the preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pharmacy Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

    Raliat Onatade & Jasmine Fernando

  2. Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Academic Group, King’s Health Partners’, London, UK

    Raliat Onatade, Vivian Auyeung, Greg Scutt & Jasmine Fernando

  3. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK

    Vivian Auyeung & Greg Scutt

Authors
  1. Raliat Onatade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivian Auyeung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Greg Scutt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jasmine Fernando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raliat Onatade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Onatade, R., Auyeung, V., Scutt, G. et al. Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Patients on Admission and Discharge from an Older Peoples’ Unit of an Acute UK Hospital. Drugs Aging 30, 729–737 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0097-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0097-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation