Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns and Determinants of Dementia Pharmacotherapy in a Population-Based Cohort of Home Care Clients

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the needs of older home care clients with dementia or their key quality of care issues, including their use of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics of clients with dementia (relative to two control subgroups) from a population-based home care cohort; and, (2) determine the distribution and associated characteristics of cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) and/or memantine use among dementia clients overall and according to medication class, comorbid illness, and year of assessment.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included all home care clients aged 50 years or older assessed with the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) in Ontario, Canada from January 2003 to December 2010. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with receiving a dementia medication (a ChEI and/or memantine).

Results

There were 104,802 (21.5 %) clients with a diagnosis of dementia, 92,529 (18.9 %) cognitively impaired clients without a dementia diagnosis, and 290,929 (59.6 %) cognitively intact clients. Relative to the comparison groups, dementia clients were more likely to have reported conflicts with others, a distressed caregiver, greater levels of cognitive and functional impairment, and to exhibit wandering, aggressive behaviors, anxiety, hallucinations or delusions, and swallowing problems. Approximately half of dementia clients were taking a dementia medication, most commonly donepezil. Characteristics most strongly associated with use of ChEI monotherapy included age greater than 64 (especially 75–84), absence of economic barriers, availability of a primary caregiver, year of assessment, moderate to severe cognitive impairment, relative independence in function, health stability, no depressive symptoms or hallucinations/delusions, no recent hospitalization, use of at least 9 medications, the absence of chronic health and neurological conditions, and the use of an antipsychotic or antidepressant. For combination therapy, strong positive associations were observed for younger age, year of assessment, increasing cognitive impairment, presence of a primary caregiver, male sex, absence of economic barriers, use of at least 9 medications, and various indicators of positive health status (e.g., stability in health, absence of chronic health and neurological conditions, and no recent hospitalization). The percentage of clients receiving ChEIs increased with cognitive impairment scores but declined slightly at the highest level of impairment, whereas the percentage receiving memantine increased with cognitive impairment level. The number and percentage of dementia clients receiving any pharmacotherapy increased during the study interval.

Conclusions

We observed a relatively high prevalence of dementia-specific pharmacotherapy among Ontario long-stay home care clients as well as significant variation in utilization patterns by select sociodemographic, functional, and clinical characteristics, and over time. While physicians generally followed recommended guidelines regarding appropriate dementia pharmacotherapy, continued efforts to monitor practice patterns are required among vulnerable older adults across care settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization and Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jakobsen M, Poulsen PB, Reiche T, et al. Costs of informal care for people suffering from dementia: evidence from a Danish survey. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2011;1(1):418–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill J, Fillit H, Thomas SK, et al. Functional impairment, healthcare costs and the prevalence of institutionalisation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(3):265–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leicht H, Heinrich S, Heider D, et al. Net costs of dementia by disease stage. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124(5):384–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smetanin P, Kobak P, Briante C, Stiff D, Sherman G, Ahmad S. Rising tide: the impact of dementia in Canada 2008 to 2038. Toronto: Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Health Council of Canada. Seniors in need, caregivers in distress: what are the home care profiles for seniors in Canada? Toronto. ON: Health Council of Canada; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Canadian Institutes for Health Information. Caring for seniors with Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia. https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Dementia_AIB_2010_EN.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2012.

  8. Vu M, Hogan DB, Patten SB, Jetté N, Bronskill SE, Heckman G, Kergoat M-J, Hirdes JP, Chen J, Zehr MM, Maxwell CJ. A comprehensive profile of the sociodemographic, psychosocial and health characteristics of Ontario home care clients with dementia. CDIC; 2012 (submitted).

  9. Brayne C, David D. Making Alzheimer’s and dementia research fit for population. Lancet. 2012;380(9851):1441–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoenmaker N, Van Gool WA. The age gap between patients in clinical studies and in the general population: a pitfall for dementia research. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(10):627–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill SS, Bronskill SE, Mamdani M, et al. Representation of patients with dementia in clinical trials of donepezil. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;11(2):e274–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hogan DB, Bailey P, Black S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 5. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for mild to moderate dementia. CMAJ. 2008;179(10):1019–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrmann N, Gauthier S. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 6. Management of severe Alzheimer disease. CMAJ. 2008;179(12):1279–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt H-P, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 2005;331(7512):321–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Birks J. Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(1):CD005593.

  16. McShane R, Areosa Sastre A, Minakaran N. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(2):CD003154.

  17. Rolinski M, Fox C, Maidment I, McShane R. Cholinesterase inhibitors for dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease dementia and cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(3):CD006504.

  18. Raina P, Santaguida P, Ismaila A, et al. Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: evidence review for a clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(5):379–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Knapp M, Iemmi V, Romeo R. Dementia care costs and outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012. doi:10.1002/gps.3864.

  20. Pariente A, Fourrier-Réglat A, Ducruet T, et al. Antipsychotic use and myocardial infarction in older patients with treated dementia. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(8):648–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hernandez RK, Farwell W, Cantor MD, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors and incidence of bradycardia in patients with dementia in the Veterans Affairs New England Healthcare System. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(11):1997–2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gill SS, Anderson GM, Fischer HD, et al. Syncope and its consequences in patients with dementia receiving cholinesterase inhibitors. A population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):867–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carnahan RM, Lund BC, Perry PJ, et al. The concurrent use of anticholinergics and cholinesterase inhibitors: rare event or common practice? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(12):2082–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhalla IA, Anderson GM, Mamdani MM, et al. Inappropriate prescribing before and after nursing home admission. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(6):995–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barro-Belaygues N, van Kan GA, Rolland Y, et al. Patterns of dementia treatment use in assisted living facilities: a cross-sectional study of 1975 demented residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(9):648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenblatt A, Samus QM, Onyike CU, et al. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in assisted living: patterns of use and association with retention. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;23(2):178–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parsons C, Briesacher BA, Givens JL, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitor and memantine use in newly admitted nursing home residents with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(7):1253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seitz DP, Gruneir A, Conn DK, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitor use in US nursing homes: results from the National Nursing Home Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(12):2269–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gruber-Baldini AL, Stuart B, Zuckerman IH, et al. Treatment of dementia in community-dwelling and institutionalized Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(10):1508–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pedone C, Lapane KL, Mor V, et al. Donepezil use in US nursing homes. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(1):60–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu CW, Livote EE, Kahle-Wrobleski K, et al. Longitudinal medication usage in Alzheimer disease patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010;24(4):354–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoffmann F, van den Bussche H, Wiese B, et al. Impact of geriatric comorbidity and polypharmacy on cholinesterase inhibitors prescribing in dementia. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;6(11):190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schneider LS, Insel PS, Weiner MW, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine of patients in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(1):58–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Franchi C, Lucca U, Tettamanti M, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitor use in Alzheimer’s disease: the EPIFARM-Elderly Project. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(5):497–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hernandez S, McClendon MJ, Zhou X-H, et al. Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: effect of race and demographic variables. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;19(2):665–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Formiga F, Fort I, Robles MJ, et al. Lower Barthel Index scores predict less prescription of pharmacological therapy in elderly patients with Alzheimer disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;29(3):198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Amuah JE, Hogan DB, Eliasziw M, et al. Persistence with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in a population-based cohort of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(7):670–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pariente A, Pinet M, Moride Y, et al. Factors associated with persistence of cholinesterase inhibitor treatments in the elderly. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(7):680–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McClendon MJ, Hernandez S, Smyth KA, et al. Memantine and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment in cases of CDR 0.5 or questionable impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;16(3):577–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Herrmann N, Gill SS, Bell CM, et al. A population-based study of cholinesterase inhibitor use for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(10):1517–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Belle SH, Zhang S, Czaja SJ, et al. Use of cognitive enhancement medication in persons with Alzheimer disease who have a family caregiver: results from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH) project. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12(3):250–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Canadian Home Care Association. Portraits of Home Care in Canada. Mississauga: CHCA; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Home Care Reporting System (HCRS) Privacy Impact Assessment. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes for Health Information; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hirdes JP, Ljunggren G, Morris JN, et al. Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;30(8):277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Landi F, Tua E, Onder G, et al. Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community. Med Care. 2000;38(12):1184–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Morris JN, Fries BE, Steel K, et al. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(8):1017–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Poss JW, Jutan NM, Hirdes JP, et al. A review of evidence on the reliability and validity of Minimum Data Set data. Healthc Manage Forum. 2008;21(1):33–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, et al. MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J Gerontol. 1994;49(4):M174–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Morris JN, Fries BE, Morris SA. Scaling ADLs within the MDS. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54(11):M546–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hirdes JP, Frijters DH, Teare GF. The MDS-CHESS scale: a new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(1):96–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Burrows AB, Morris JN, Simon SE, et al. Development of a Minimum Data Set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes. Age Ageing. 2000;29(2):165–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, et al. Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50(2):M128–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Perlman CM, Hirdes JP. The Aggressive Behavior Scale: a new scale to measure aggression based on the Minimum Data Set. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(12):2298–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ministry Programs: Ontario Drug Benefit Program. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/drugs/programs/odb/odb.aspx. Accessed 22 Dec 2012.

  55. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario Drug Benefit Program: limited use (LU) drug products. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/drugs/programs/odb/opdp_limited_use.aspx. Accessed 22 Dec 2012.

  56. Canadian Pharmacists Association. Compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialties. Ottawa: Canadian Pharmacists Association; 2012.

  57. Gambassi G, Landi F, Peng L, et al. Validity of diagnostic and drug data in standardized nursing home resident assessments: potential for geriatric pharmacoepidemiology. SAGE Study Group. Systematic Assessment of Geriatric drug use via Epidemiology. Med Care. 1998;36(2):167–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Mor V, Intrator O, Unruh MA, et al. Temporal and geographic variation in the validity and internal consistency of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set 2.0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;15(11):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wodchis WP, Naglie G, Teare GF. Validating diagnostic information on the Minimum Data Set in Ontario hospital-based long-term care. Med Care. 2008;46(8):882–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hoffmann F, van den Bussche H, Glaeske G, et al. Eight-year prescription trends of memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors among persons 65 years and older in Germany. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;25(1):29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mamdani M, Rapoport M, Shulman KI, et al. Mental health-related drug utilization among older adults. Prevalence, trends and costs. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13(10):892–900.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schneider LS. Discontinuing donepezil or starting memantine for Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):957–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Tariot PN, Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, for the Memantine Study Group, et al. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291(3):317–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Howard R, McShane R, Lindesay J, et al. Donepezil and memantine for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):893–903.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Vidal J-S, Lacombe J-M, Dartigues J-F, et al. Memantine therapy for Alzheimer disease in real-world practice. An observational study in a large representative sample of French patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008;22(2):125–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Gilligan AM, Malone DC, Warholak TL, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in Alzheimer’s disease pharmacotherapy exposure: an analysis across four state Medicaid populations. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012;10(5):303–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Vigen CLP, Mack WJ, Keefe RSE, et al. Cognitive effects of atypical antipsychotic medications in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: outcomes from CATIE-AD. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(8):831–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Schneider LS, Dagerman K, Insel PS. Efficacy and adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics for dementia: meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(3):191–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Boudreau DM, Yu O, Gray SL, et al. Concomitant use of cholinesterase inhibitors and anticholinergics: prevalence and outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(11):2069–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the National Population Health Study of Neurological Conditions. We wish to acknowledge the membership of Neurological Health Charities Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada for their contribution to the success of this initiative.

Funding for the study was provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors/researchers, and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. The study sponsor played no role in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Dr. Hogan holds the Brenda Strafford Foundation Chair in Geriatric Medicine. Dr. Jetté holds an Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Population Investigator Award and a Canada Research Chair in Neurological Health Services Research. Dr. Bronskill is supported by a New Investigator Award in Aging from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Dr. Hirdes holds the Ontario Home Care Research and Knowledge Exchange Chair funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

All co-authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    Colleen J. Maxwell & Mary Vu

  2. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Colleen J. Maxwell, Mary Vu, Micaela Jantzi, George Heckman & John P. Hirdes

  3. Department of Community Health Sciences and Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Colleen J. Maxwell, David B. Hogan, Scott B. Patten & Nathalie Jetté

  4. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Colleen J. Maxwell & Susan E. Bronskill

  5. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    David B. Hogan

  6. Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Département de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Marie-Jeanne Kergoat

  7. Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Nathalie Jetté

  8. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Susan E. Bronskill

  9. Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    George Heckman

Authors
  1. Colleen J. Maxwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Vu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David B. Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Scott B. Patten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Micaela Jantzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marie-Jeanne Kergoat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nathalie Jetté
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Susan E. Bronskill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. George Heckman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. John P. Hirdes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen J. Maxwell.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maxwell, C.J., Vu, M., Hogan, D.B. et al. Patterns and Determinants of Dementia Pharmacotherapy in a Population-Based Cohort of Home Care Clients. Drugs Aging 30, 569–585 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0083-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0083-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation