Skip to main content
Log in

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Considering the Risk for Congenital Heart Defects of Antidepressant Classes and Individual Antidepressants

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Antidepressant use during the first trimester is reported in 4–8% of pregnancies. The use of some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during the first trimester has been identified as increasing the odds for congenital heart defects; however, little is known about the safety of non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants.

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the odds of congenital heart defects associated with the use of antidepressants during the first trimester of pregnancy, and to update the literature as newer studies have been published since the latest systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Methods

PubMed and Embase were searched till 3 June, 2020. Study quality was assessed, and study details were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, which assessed: (1) any antidepressant usage; (2) classes of antidepressants; and (3) individual antidepressants.

Results

Twenty studies were identified, encompassing 5,337,223 pregnancies. The odds ratio for maternal use of any antidepressant during the first trimester of pregnancy and the presence of congenital heart defects from the random effects meta-analysis was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.41). Significant odds ratios of 1.69 (95% CI 1.37–2.10) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.15–1.37) were reported for serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, respectively. A non-statistically significant odds ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 0.82–1.25) was reported for the tricyclic antidepressants. Analyses of individual SSRIs produced significant odds ratios of 1.57 (95% CI 1.25–1.97), 1.36 (95% CI 1.08–1.72), and 1.29 (95% CI 1.14–1.45) for paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline, respectively. The norepinephrine-dopamine-reuptake inhibitor bupropion also produced a significant odds ratio of 1.23 (95% CI 1.01–1.49).

Conclusions

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor classes of antidepressants pose a greater risk for causing congenital heart defects than the tricyclic antidepressants. However, this risk for individual antidepressants within each class varies, and information regarding some antidepressants is still lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jimenez-Solem E, Andersen JT, Petersen M, Broedbaek K, Andersen NL, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Prevalence of antidepressant use during pregnancy in Denmark, a nation-wide cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e63034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell AA, Gilboa SM, Werler MM, Kelley KE, Louik C, Hernandez-Diaz S. Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976–2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(1):51.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanley GE, Mintzes B. Patterns of psychotropic medicine use in pregnancy in the United States from 2006 to 2011 among women with private insurance. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:242. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hillhouse TM, Porter JH. A brief history of the development of antidepressant drugs: from monoamines to glutamate. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nevels RM, Gontkovsky ST, Williams BE. Paroxetine-the antidepressant from hell? Probably not, but caution required. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2016;46(1):77–104.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams M, Wooltorton E. Paroxetine (Paxil) and congenital malformations. CMAJ. 2005;173(11):1320–1. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bérard A, Iessa N, Chaabane S, Muanda FT, Boukhris T, Zhao JP. The risk of major cardiac malformations associated with paroxetine use during the first trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81(4):589–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Einarson A, Selby P, Koren G. Abrupt discontinuation of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy: fear of teratogenic risk and impact of counselling. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2001;26(1):44–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen LS, Altshuler LL, Harlow BL, Nonacs R, Newport DJ, Viguera AC, et al. Relapse of major depression during pregnancy in women who maintain or discontinue antidepressant treatment. JAMA. 2006;295(5):499–507. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.5.499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Myles N, Newall H, Ward H, Large M. Systematic meta-analysis of individual selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications and congenital malformations. Aust NZ J Psychiat. 2013;47(11):1002–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413492219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bar-Oz B, Einarson T, Einarson A, Boskovic R, O’Brien L, Malm H, et al. Paroxetine and congenital malformations: meta-analysis and consideration of potential confounding factors. Clin Ther. 2007;29(5):918–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao SY, Wu QJ, Zhang TN, Shen ZQ, Liu CX, Xu X, et al. Fluoxetine and congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(10):2134–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Riggin L, Frankel Z, Moretti M, Pupco A, Koren G. The fetal safety of fluoxetine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(4):362–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30965-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen ZQ, Gao SY, Li SX, Zhang TN, Liu CX, Lv HC, et al. Sertraline use in the first trimester and risk of congenital anomalies: a systemic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(4):909–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grigoriadis S, VonderPorten EH, Mamisashvili L, Roerecke M, Rehm J, Dennis CL, et al. Antidepressant exposure during pregnancy and congenital malformations: is there an association? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the best evidence. J Clin Psychiat. 2013;74(4):e293-308. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.12r07966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ban L, Gibson JE, West J, Fiaschi L, Sokal R, Smeeth L, et al. Maternal depression, antidepressant prescriptions, and congenital anomaly risk in offspring: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(12):1471–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bérard A, Zhao JP, Sheehy O. Sertraline use during pregnancy and the risk of major malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):795.e1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Furu K, Kieler H, Haglund B, Engeland A, Selmer R, Stephansson O, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine in early pregnancy and risk of birth defects: population based cohort study and sibling design. BMJ. 2015;350:h1798. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Knudsen TM, Hansen AV, Garne E, Andersen AM. Increased risk of severe congenital heart defects in offspring exposed to selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in early pregnancy: an epidemiological study using validated EUROCAT data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:333. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Louik C, Kerr S, Mitchell AA. First-trimester exposure to bupropion and risk of cardiac malformations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23(10):1066–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jordan S, Morris JK, Davies GI, Tucker D, Thayer DS, Luteijn JM, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants in pregnancy and congenital anomalies: analysis of linked databases in Wales, Norway and Funen, Denmark. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0165122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dolk H, McCullough N, Callaghan S, Casey F, Craig B, Given J, et al. Risk factors for congenital heart disease: the Baby Hearts Study, a population-based case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(2):e0227908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Huybrechts KF, Bateman BT, Pawar A, Bessette LG, Mogun H, Levin R, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes following exposure to duloxetine in pregnancy: cohort study. BMJ. 2020;368:m237. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hartling L, Milne A, Hamm MP, Vandermeer B, Ansari M, Tsertsvadze A, et al. Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):982–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lo CK-L, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis RL, Rubanowice D, McPhillips H, Raebel MA, Andrade SE, Smith D, et al. Risks of congenital malformations and perinatal events among infants exposed to antidepressant medications during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16(10):1086–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.4 ed. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.

  28. Huybrechts KF, Palmsten K, Avorn J, Cohen LS, Holmes LB, Franklin JM, et al. Antidepressant use in pregnancy and the risk of cardiac defects. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(25):2397–407. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1312828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, Aschengrau A, Cabral H, Jick SS. Antidepressant use during early pregnancy and the risk of congenital anomalies. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33(7):693–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Margulis AV, Abou-Ali A, Strazzeri MM, Ding Y, Kuyateh F, Frimpong EY, et al. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and cardiac malformations: a propensity-score matched cohort in CPRD. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(9):942–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nordeng H, van Gelder MM, Spigset O, Koren G, Einarson A, Eberhard-Gran M. Pregnancy outcome after exposure to antidepressants and the role of maternal depression: results from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32(2):186–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182490eaf.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Colvin L, Slack-Smith L, Stanley FJ, Bower C. Dispensing patterns and pregnancy outcomes for women dispensed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91(3):142–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Merlob P, Birk E, Sirota L, Linder N, Berant M, Stahl B, et al. Are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors cardiac teratogens? Echocardiographic screening of newborns with persistent heart murmur. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85(10):837–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oberlander TF, Warburton W, Misri S, Riggs W, Aghajanian J, Hertzman C. Major congenital malformations following prenatal exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines using population-based health data. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2008;83(1):68–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrb.20144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Diav-Citrin O, Shechtman S, Weinbaum D, Wajnberg R, Avgil M, Di Gianantonio E, et al. Paroxetine and fluoxetine in pregnancy: a prospective, multicentre, controlled, observational study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66(5):695–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03261.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kulin NA, Pastuszak A, Sage SR, Schick-Boschetto B, Spivey G, Feldkamp M, et al. Pregnancy outcome following maternal use of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a prospective controlled multicenter study. JAMA. 1998;279(8):609–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.8.609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Polen KN, Rasmussen SA, Riehle-Colarusso T, Reefhuis J. Association between reported venlafaxine use in early pregnancy and birth defects, national birth defects prevention study, 1997–2007. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Jonge L, van der Woude ZPA, Bos HJ, de Berg JDLT, Bakker MK. Identifying associations between maternal medication use and birth defects using a case-population approach: an exploratory study on signal detection. Drug Saf. 2013;36(11):1069–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0082-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Alwan S, Reefhuis J, Botto LD, Rasmussen SA, Correa A, Friedman JM. Maternal use of bupropion and risk for congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):52.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kornum JB, Nielsen RB, Pedersen L, Mortensen PB, Norgaard M. Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors during early pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: updated analysis. Clin Epidemiol. 2010;2(1):29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Källén BA, Otterblad OP. Maternal use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in early pregnancy and infant congenital malformations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007;79(4):301–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jimenez-Solem E, Andersen JT, Petersen M, Broedbaek K, Jensen JK, Afzal S, et al. Exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of congenital malformations: a nationwide cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3):e001148. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Malm H, Artama M, Gissler M, Ritvanen A. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk for major congenital anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):111–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318220edcc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lambert O, Bourin M. SNRIs: mechanism of action and clinical features. Expert Rev Neurother. 2002;2(6):849–58. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.2.6.849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sangkuhl K, Klein TE, Altman RB. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors pathway. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2009;19(11):907–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0b013e32833132cb.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gadzhanova S, Roughead E. Use of prescription medicines in Australian women of child-bearing age. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;16:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-015-0033-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.1.54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Norvell DC. Study types and bias: don’t judge a study by the abstract’s conclusion alone. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2010;1(2):7–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100908.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Narchi H, Kulaylat N. Heart disease in infants of diabetic mothers. Images Paediatr Cardiol. 2000;2(2):17–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Y-F, Zeng X-L, Zhao E-F, Lu H-W. Diagnostic value of fetal echocardiography for congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2015;94(42):e1759. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001759.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Davis AP, Grondin CJ, Johnson RJ, Sciaky D, McMorran R, Wiegers J, et al. The comparative toxicogenomics database: update 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D948–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney De Vries.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

Courtney De Vries, Svetla Gadzhanova, Matthew J. Sykes, Michael Ward, and Elizabeth Roughead have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article and declare no support from any organization for the submitted work.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

CDV has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide licence to the publishers and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats, and media.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Electronic Supplementary Material).

Code availability

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

ER and CDV designed the study. CDV performed the literature search. CDV and SG extracted data from the identified articles. CDV conducted the meta-analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript, contributed to its revision, and approved the final version submitted.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Vries, C., Gadzhanova, S., Sykes, M.J. et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Considering the Risk for Congenital Heart Defects of Antidepressant Classes and Individual Antidepressants. Drug Saf 44, 291–312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-01027-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-01027-x

Navigation