Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence, Safety and Long-Term Retention Rates of Biologics in Hong Kong from 2001 to 2015

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Biologic agents were initially introduced as treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but have since been used for other medical conditions. As new biologics become increasingly widespread in treatment regimens, it is important to understand their safety and utilization in the post-marketing context.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate long-term prescribing patterns and the safety of biologics in real clinical settings in Hong Kong.

Methods

This was a population-based drug utilization study in Hong Kong using a territory-wide electronic medical database Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS). Patients who received biologic treatments from 2001 to 2015 were identified and their corresponding demographic and clinical details retrieved from CDARS. The annual prevalence of biologic prescriptions, the long-term retention rates and incidence rates of infections associated with biologic treatments were evaluated.

Results

A total of 30,298 patients (male: 44%) prescribed biologic treatments were identified from CDARS from 2001 to 2015. The annual prevalence of biologic prescriptions increased from 0.1 to 16.1 per 100 persons for both sexes. Infliximab had the highest first-year retention rate of 95.6% among all biologics and continuously attained the highest retention rate from second to fifth year. The overall incidence rate of serious infections was less than five per 100 person-years. Specifically, the incidence rates of tuberculosis, upper and lower respiratory infections and herpes zoster were 0.52, 3.24, 4.99 and 1.01 per 100 person-years, respectively.

Conclusion

This population-based study revealed an increasing prevalence of biologic prescribing. Results from the study described the long-term retention rates and incidence rates of serious infections of biologic treatments for all indications, and confirmed the safety of biologic treatments. Since this study provides an overview of all biologic utilization, further studies on cost effectiveness, safety and compliance of treatment in different patient groups are still warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FDA US. What are “biologics” questions and answers. US food and drug administration. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/centersoffices/officeofmedicalproductsandtobacco/cber/ucm133077.htm. Accessed 02 June 2018.

  2. Morrow T, Felcone LH. Defining the difference: what makes biologics unique. Biotechnol Healthc. 2004;1(4):24–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosman Z, Shoenfeld Y, Zandman-Goddard G. Biologic therapy for autoimmune diseases: an update. BMC Med. 2013;11(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Raychaudhuri SP, Raychaudhuri SK. Biologics: target-specific treatment of systemic and cutaneous autoimmune diseases. Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54(2):100–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.53175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sebba A. Tocilizumab: the first interleukin-6-receptor inhibitor. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(15):1413–8. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rozenblit M, Lebwohl M. New biologics for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Dermatol Ther. 2009;22(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.01216.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tobin AM, Kirby B. TNF alpha inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Biodrugs. 2005;19(1):47–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gulyas K, Bodnar N, Nagy Z, Szamosi S, Horvath A, Vancsa A, et al. Real-life experience with switching TNF-alpha inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(Suppl 1):S93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0598-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Behm BW, Bickston SJ. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody for maintenance of remission in Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD006893. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, Gao L-L, Blank MA, Johanns J, Guzzo C, et al. Ustekinumab induction and maintenance therapy in refractory Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(16):1519–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1203572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carethers JM. Systemic treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: tailoring therapy to the tumor. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2008;1(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X08093607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Crawford S. Is it time for a new paradigm for systemic cancer treatment? Lessons from a century of cancer chemotherapy. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4:68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Brennan DC, Daller JA, Lake KD, Cibrik D, Del Castillo D. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(19):1967–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Ying GS, Grunwald JE, Fine SL, Jaffe GJ. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1897–908. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McClung MR, Lewiecki EM, Cohen SB, Bolognese MA, Woodson GC, Moffett AH, et al. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(8):821–31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa044459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Group I-RS. Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. Pediatrics. 1998;102(3):531–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin-Mola E, Balsa A. Infectious complications of biologic agents. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35(1):183–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2009.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohan AK, Cote TR, Siegel JN, Braun MM. Infectious complications of biologic treatments of rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003;15(3):179–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sathish JG, Sethu S, Bielsky MC, de Haan L, French NS, Govindappa K, et al. Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(4):306–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bresnihan B, Cunnane GJR. Infection complications associated with the use of biologic agents. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003;29(1):185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Rheumatoid arthritis: the management of rheumatoid arthritis in adults. NICE Clinical Guideline 79. 2009. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG79NICEGuideline.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2012.

  22. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Kary S, Rau R, von Hinueber U, Stoyanova-Scholz M, et al. Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3403–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bongartz T, Sutton AJ, Sweeting MJ, Buchan I, Matteson EL, Montori V. Anti-tnf antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2006;295(19):2275–85. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.19.2275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lai EC, Man KK, Chaiyakunapruk N, Cheng CL, Chien HC, Chui CS, et al. brief report: databases in the asia-pacific region: the potential for a distributed network approach. Epidemiology. 2015;26(6):815–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Man KKC, Chan EW, Ip P, Coghill D, Simonoff E, Chan PKL, et al. Prenatal antidepressant use and risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357:j2350. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Man KKC, Coghill D, Chan EW, Lau WCY, Hollis C, Liddle E, et al. Association of risk of suicide attempts with methylphenidate treatment. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(10):1048–55. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lau WC, Chan EW, Cheung C-L, Sing CW, Man KK, Lip GY, et al. Association between dabigatran vs warfarin and risk of osteoporotic fractures among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2017;317(11):1151–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Man KKC, Ip P, Hsia Y, Chan EW, Chui CSL, Lam MPS, et al. ADHD drug prescribing trend is increasing among children and adolescents in Hong Kong. J Atten Disord. 2017;21(14):1161–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714536047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Raman SR, Man KKC, Bahmanyar S, Berard A, Bilder S, Boukhris T, et al. Trends in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication use: a retrospective observational study using population-based databases. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(10):824–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30293-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong ICK. New antiepileptic drugs—study suggests that under a quarter of patients will still be taking the new drugs after six years. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):603–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong ICK, Chadwick DW, Fenwick PBC, Mawer GE, Sander JWAS. The long-term use of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin in patients with chronic epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1999;40(10):1439–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb02017.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong ICK. New antiepileptic drugs. Study suggests that under a quarter of patients will still be taking the new drugs after six years. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):603–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lhatoo SD, Wong IC, Sander JW. Prognostic factors affecting long-term retention of topiramate in patients with chronic epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2000;41(3):338–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Beal GM, Bohlen JM. The diffusion process. Agricultural experiment station. Ames: Iowa State College; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Simard JF, Arkema EV, Sundstrom A, Geborek P, Saxne T, Baecklund E, et al. Ten years with biologics: to whom do data on effectiveness and safety apply? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(1):204–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bridges SL. National institute of arthritis and musculoskeletal and skin diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2000;2(1):0003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wing-ho Shiu TKW, Chao DVK. A review on the diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis in general practice. HK Pract. 2018;40:61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ip TP, Cheung SK, Cheung TC, Choi TC, Chow SL, Ho YY, et al. The osteoporosis Society of Hong Kong (OSHK): 2013 OSHK guideline for clinical management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2013;19(Suppl 2):1–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Frazier-Mironer A, Dougados M, Mariette X, Cantagrel A, Deschamps V, Flipo RM, et al. Retention rates of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab as first and second-line biotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice. Jt Bone Spine. 2014;81(4):352–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Favalli EG, Pontikaki I, Becciolini A, Biggioggero M, Ughi N, Romano M, et al. Real-life 10-year retention rate of first-line anti-TNF drugs for inflammatory arthritides in adult- and juvenile-onset populations: similarities and differences. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(8):1747–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3712-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hetland ML, Christensen IJ, Tarp U, Dreyer L, Hansen A, Hansen IT, et al. Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Waugh AW, Garg S, Matic K, Gramlich L, Wong C, Sadowski DC, et al. Maintenance of clinical benefit in Crohn’s disease patients after discontinuation of infliximab: long-term follow-up of a single centre cohort. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(9):1129–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04446.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Ballet V, Gabriels F, Noman M, D’Haens G, et al. Switch to adalimumab in patients with Crohn’s disease controlled by maintenance infliximab: prospective randomised SWITCH trial. Gut. 2012;61(2):229–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wan R, Mok Chi C. The Hong Kong Society of Rheumatology Biologics Registry: updated report (May 2018). Hong Kong Bull Rheum Dis. 2018;18(1):30. https://doi.org/10.2478/hkbrd-2018-0006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mok CC, Tam LS, Chan TH, Lee GKW, Li EKM, Hong Kong Society of R. Management of rheumatoid arthritis: consensus recommendations from the Hong Kong Society of Rheumatology. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(3):303–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1596-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. 2015 American College of rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Scheinberg M, Goldenberg J, Feldman DP, Nobrega JL. Retrospective study evaluating dose standards for infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo. Brazil. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(8):1049–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-0908-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Leung GM, Tin KY, O’Donnell O. Redistribution or horizontal equity in Hong Kong’s mixed public-private health system: a policy conundrum. Health Econ. 2009;18(1):37–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms Lisa Lam for copyediting the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue Li.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by Pfizer Corporation Hong Kong Limited [project tracking number: W1198308].

Ethics Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster and University of Hong Kong Institutional Review Board (UW14-602).

Conflict of Interest

Xue Li has received research funding from the Food and Health Bureau of the Government of Hong Kong. Kenneth Man received the CW Maplethorpe Fellowship and personal fees from IQVIA Holdings, Inc., unrelated to this work. Esther Chan has received research funding from Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom; National Natural Science Fund of China, China; The Hong Kong Research Grants Council; The Research Fund Secretariat of the Food and Health Bureau; Narcotics Division of the Security Bureau of The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Bayer and Janssen, a Division of Johnson & Johnson, for work unrelated to this study. Ian Wong has received grants from the Research Grants Council (RGC, Hong Kong), Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), Shire, Janssen-Cilag, Eli-Lily, Pfizer, Bayer, and the European Union FP7 program, outside the submitted work. Ian Wong is a member of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) ADHD Guideline Group, the British Association for Psychopharmacology ADHD guideline group, and advisor to Shire. Mengqin Ge and Celine Chui declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Mengqin Ge and Kenneth K. Man are co-first author.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, M., Man, K.K., Chui, C.S. et al. Prevalence, Safety and Long-Term Retention Rates of Biologics in Hong Kong from 2001 to 2015. Drug Saf 42, 1091–1102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00844-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00844-z

Navigation