Causality Assessment in Pharmacovigilance: Still a Challenge
- 786 Downloads
Causality in pharmacovigilance is a difficult and time consuming exercise. This paper presents the challenges in determining causation by drug therapy. The first is that causation is complex and needs to be viewed from the context of the patient treated, rather than the drug product. Multiple causal vectors should be considered if we are to tackle the many issues involved in, for example, medication error and the many other factors that lead to bad outcomes from therapy, including failure to recognise known risk factors. The aim of pharmacovigilance is not only a bureaucratic exercise in public health norms, but is mainly concerned with small minorities of statistical outliers—and even individuals—whose experiences from harms may together form messages about causation that will prevent further at-risk patients from exposure, or at least assist with earlier recognition of drug-related harm and better management of such harm. This requires more time, more data, more analysis and more patient and clinical involvement in reporting useful clinical detail. The paradigm shift back towards gathering more case data relating to possible causation can be selective and would not be just retrogressive, nor necessarily too costly. Greater transparency of hypotheses and availability of anonymised case data will enrol more expertise into evaluations and hypothesis testing, and the provision of more complete and useful information should reduce clinical burdens from bad patient outcomes as well as their overall costs to society.
- 2.Edwards IR, Lindquist M (eds) Pharmacovigilance: critiques and ways forward (2017). ISBN 978-3-319-40399-1 ISBN 978-3-319-40400-4 (eBook),pp v–vii. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40400-4.
- 8.Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e297. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Whitehead AN. Science and philosophy (Philosophical Society. Ebook) New York; 1948 (ISBN: 978-1-4976-7615-2).Google Scholar
- 12.Popper, K. The logic of scientific discovery (Taylor & Francis e-Library ed.). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis e-Library; 2005. pp. 47–50 (Section 6 footnote *3 ISBN 0203994620).Google Scholar
- 15.Hitchcock C. Probabilistic causation. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-probabilistic/#CauMarCon.508.Accessed 22nd Sept 2016.
- 16.Taleb NN. The black swan. New York: Random House; 2010. ISBN 978-0-679-60418-1.Google Scholar
- 23.Castor O, Edwards IR. Reflections on attribution and decisions in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2010;33(10):1–5.Google Scholar
- 24.Effective communications in pharmacovigilance: the Erice declaration. http://www.who-umc.org/graphics/24752.pdf Accessed 10 Jan 2017.