Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Drugs Marketed in Australia, the USA, Denmark, and the UK

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy and lactation labeling is presented in the officially recognized product information (PI) accompanying prescription drugs to ensure appropriate prescribing in pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze pregnancy and lactation labeling in PI for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder drugs marketed across countries and to compare this information with respect to consistency and discrepancy.

Methods

We manually surveyed PI for atomoxetine, methylphenidate, and modafinil marketed by the same pharmaceutical companies in Australia, the USA, Denmark, and the UK. We extracted information regarding data sources (animal and human data), risk to the fetus or breastfed child, excretion in breast milk, and recommendations for use. The extracted information was then analyzed and compared with respect to consistency and discrepancy.

Results

Inter-country discrepancies were identified with respect to both animal and human data sources presented, types of risks listed in association with exposure during pregnancy and lactation, information regarding excretion of the drug in breast milk, and recommendations for use. Consistency was identified between PI for drugs marketed in the EU.

Conclusion

The study suggests that pregnancy and lactation labeling in PI for drugs marketed by the same pharmaceutical companies depend on the country of marketing; this raises concern about the reliability of PI documents as a useful source of information for appropriate prescribing during pregnancy and lactation. Discrepancies in this information can potentially lead to inappropriate prescribing in pregnant and breastfeeding women, who may expose their fetuses and breastfed children to unnecessary risks. At the same time, unjustified warnings against breastfeeding may result in children being unnecessarily weaned from being breastfed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration and the US Food and Drug Administration classify risk associated with medication exposure during pregnancy into seven (A, B1, B2, B3, C, D, X) and five (A, B, C, D, X) categories, respectively, based on the availability of human and animal data. A is considered the safest category while the category X is completely contraindicated.

References

  1. Lal R, Kremzner M. Introduction to the new prescription drug labeling by the Food and Drug Administration. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(23):2488–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aagaard L, Hansen EH. Adverse drug reaction labelling for atomoxetine, methylphenidate and modafinil: comparison of product information for oral formulations in Australia, Denmark and the United States. Curr Drug Saf. 2013;8(3):162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eriksson R, Aagaard L, Juhl Jensen L, Borisova L, Hørlück D, Brunak S, et al. Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2014;2(3):1–10.

  4. Garbe E, Andersohn F. Contraindication labelling changes in the United States and Germany. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(1):87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kesselheim AS, Franklin JM, Avorn J, Duke JD. Speaking the same language? International variations in the safety information accompanying top-selling prescription drugs. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(9):727–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolea-Alamanac BM, Green A, Verma G, Maxwell P, Davies SJ. Methylphenidate use in pregnancy and lactation: a systematic review of evidence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77(1):96–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pottegard A, Hallas J, Andersen JT, Lokkegaard EC, Dideriksen D, Aagaard L, et al. First-trimester exposure to methylphenidate: a population-based cohort study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(1):e88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbins C, Weiss M. Clinical recommendations in current practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9(5):420–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenhill LL, Pliszka S, Dulcan MK, Bernet W, Arnold V, Beitchman J, et al. Practice parameter for the use of stimulant medications in the treatment of children, adolescents, and adults. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(2 Suppl):26S–49S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Diagnosis and management of ADHD in children, youg people and adults. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12061/42059/42059.pdf. 2013. Accessed 27 Feb 2014.

  11. Kooij SJ, Bejerot S, Blackwell A, Caci H, Casas-Brugue M, Carpentier PJ, et al. European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: The European Network Adult ADHD. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Slatkoff J, Greenfield B. Pharmacological treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2006;15(6):649–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Volkow ND, Swanson JM. Clinical practice: adult attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(20):1935–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Product information. http://www.tga.gov.au/hp/information-medicines-pi.htm#picmi. 19-4-2011. Accessed 4 Mar 2014.

  15. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA approved drug products. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm. 2014. Accessed 4 Mar 2014.

  16. Danish Health and Medicines Authority. Produktresuméer—human. http://www.produktresume.dk/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-96. Accessed 4 Mar 2014.

  17. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Medicines information: SPC & PILs. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Safetyinformation/Medicinesinformation/SPCandPILs/. 2014. Accessed 4 Mar 2014.

  18. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/06/WC500129131.pdf. 12-12-2012. Accessed 2 May 2014.

  19. Howard TB, Tassinari MS, Feibus KB, Mathis LL. Monitoring for teratogenic signals: pregnancy registries and surveillance methods. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(3):209–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Australian Government Department of Health.Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian categorisation system for prescribing medicines in pregnancy. http://www.tga.gov.au/hp/medicines-pregnancy-categorisation.htm. 4-5-2011. Accessed 13 Mar 2014.

  21. U.S.Food and Drug Administration. Pregnancy and lactation labelling. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/developmentapprovalprocess/developmentresources/labeling/ucm093307.htm. 11-1-2011. Accessed 14 Apr 2014.

  22. European Commission. A guideline on summary of product characteristics (SmPC). http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-2/c/smpc_guideline_rev2_en.pdf. 2009. Accessed 12 Feb 2014.

  23. European Medicines Agency. Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on risk assessment of medicinal products on human reproduction and lactation: from data to labelling. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003307.pdf. 2009. Accessed 13 Mar 2014.

  24. European Medicines Agency. Applying for EU marketing authorisation. For medicinal products for human use. 2013. Accessed 21 July 2014.

  25. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer T, Wilens T, Seidman LJ, Mick E, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: an overview. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48(1):9–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Simon V, Czobor P, Balint S, Meszaros A, Bitter I. Prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194(3):204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contribution

All authors were involved in the conception and design of this study; PW manually extracted pregnancy and lactation labeling information from the PIs investigated in this study, conducted the analysis, and wrote the first version of the manuscript; LA and EHH validated the extracted data; LA and EHH provided critical revision of the content and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interests

Pernille Warrer, Lise Aagaard, and Ebba Holme Hansen have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Funding

This study was conducted as part of a PhD project financed by the PharmaSchool, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pernille Warrer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warrer, P., Aagaard, L. & Hansen, E.H. Comparison of Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Drugs Marketed in Australia, the USA, Denmark, and the UK. Drug Saf 37, 805–813 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0215-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0215-2

Keywords

Navigation