Skip to main content

The Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics During Pregnancy: A Clinically Focused Review

Abstract

The issue of antipsychotic treatment during pregnancy is subject to substantial uncertainty and some controversy among healthcare providers, specifically pertaining to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) that are subject to a large gap in safety data during pregnancy compared with antidepressants. The amount of safety data for the use of SGAs during pregnancy is rapidly increasing, thus constantly changing the level of evidence. We performed a clinically focused review on the safety of SGA during pregnancy. Twenty-three studies provided various pregnancy outcomes for 14,382 pregnant women exposed to an SGA during pregnancy. In utero exposure to aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine is not associated with increased risks of major congenital malformations, whereas risperidone and paliperidone may be associated with a very minor increased risk of congenital malformations. Safety data on ziprasidone and clozapine remain scarce and insufficient for a quantitative safety evaluation. No or minimal safety data are available for amisulpride, asenapine, lurasidone, and sertindole. For other pregnancy outcomes of interest, e.g. miscarriage, stillbirth, and small for gestational age, the available data overall do not suggest a clinically important increased risk, and do not allow for a meaningful stratification on individual drug level. Furthermore, for neonatal adaption and childhood neurodevelopment, the data do not allow for a meaningful risk assessment. It is imperative that factors in addition to safety data, e.g. individual disease history, characteristics and treatment response, adverse reaction profile, and patient preferences, be considered for the individual patient when choosing specific SGA treatment during pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. McAllister-Williams RH, Baldwin DS, Cantwell R, Easter A, Gilvarry E, Glover V, et al. British Association for Psychopharmacology consensus guidance on the use of psychotropic medication preconception, in pregnancy and postpartum 2017. J Psychopharmacol (Oxford). 2017;31:519–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen ER, Damkier P, Pedersen LH, Fenger-Gron J, Mikkelsen RL, Nielsen RE, et al. Use of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2015;132:1–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists number 92, April 2008 (replaces practice bulletin number 87) Use of psychiatric medications during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;2008(111):1001–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chisolm MS, Payne JL. Management of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy. BMJ. 2016;532:h5918.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasan A, Falkai P, Wobrock T, Lieberman J, Glenthøj B, Gattaz WF, et al. World federation of societies of biological psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia. Part 3: Update 2015 Management of special circumstances: Depression, Suicidality, substance use disorders and pregnancy and lactation. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2015;16:142–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huybrechts KF, Hernández-Díaz S, Patorno E, Desai RJ, Mogun H, Dejene SZ, et al. Antipsychotic use in pregnancy and the risk for congenital malformations. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:938–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ennis ZN, Damkier P. Pregnancy exposure to olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, aripiprazole and risk of congenital malformations. A systematic review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;116:315–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Terrana N, Koren G, Pivovarov J, Etwel F, Nulman I. Pregnancy outcomes following in utero exposure to second-generation antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;35:559–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coughlin CG, Blackwell KA, Bartley C, Hay M, Yonkers KA, Bloch MH. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after antipsychotic medication exposure in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:1224–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products; Requirements for Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling. Federal Register. 2014 [cited 14 Nov 2017]. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/12/04/2014-28241/content-and-format-of-labeling-for-human-prescription-drug-and-biological-products-requirements-for.

  11. Guideline on the exposure to medicinal products during pregnancy: need for post-authorisation data [cited 14 Nov 2017]. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2009/11/WC500011303.pdf.

  12. Källén B, Reis M. Neonatal complications after maternal concomitant use of SSRI and other central nervous system active drugs during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32:608–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein DJ, Corbin LA, Fung MC. Olanzapine-exposed pregnancies and lactation: early experience. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;20:399–403.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shao P, Ou J, Peng M, Zhao J, Chen J, Wu R. Effects of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics on infants development who were exposed to as fetus: a post-hoc analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123373.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reis M, Källén B. Maternal use of antipsychotics in early pregnancy and delivery outcome. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28:279–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. Grade guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Källén B. Drugs during pregnancy: methodological aspects. New York: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tinker SC, Gilboa S, Reefhuis J, Jenkins MM, Schaeffer M, Moore CA. Challenges in Studying Modifiable Risk Factors for Birth Defects. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015;2:23–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Khoury MJ, Moore CA, James LM, Cordero JF. The interaction between dysmorphology and epidemiology: methodologic issues of lumping and splitting. Teratology. 1992;45:133–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedman JM. Big risks in small groups: the difference between epidemiology and counselling. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85:720–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaefer C, Hannemann D, Meister R. Post-marketing surveillance system for drugs in pregnancy: 15 years experience of ENTIS. Reprod Toxicol. 2005;20:331–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Källén BAJ. Methodological issues in the epidemiological study of the teratogenicity of drugs. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2005;45:44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Källén B, Borg N, Reis M. The use of central nervous system active drugs during pregnancy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6:1221–86.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Habermann F, Fritzsche J, Fuhlbrück F, Wacker E, Allignol A, Weber-Schoendorfer C, et al. Atypical antipsychotic drugs and pregnancy outcome: a prospective, cohort study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013;33:453–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vigod SN, Gomes T, Wilton AS, Taylor VH, Ray JG. Antipsychotic drug use in pregnancy: high dimensional, propensity matched, population based cohort study. BMJ. 2015;350:h2298.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Petersen I, McCrea RL, Sammon CJ, Osborn DPJ, Evans SJ, Cowen PJ, et al. Risks and benefits of psychotropic medication in pregnancy: cohort studies based on UK electronic primary care health records. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–176.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Koren G. The effect of ascertainment bias in evaluating gestational antidepressant exposure. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18:e174–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brunner E, Falk DM, Jones M, Dey DK, Shatapathy CC. Olanzapine in pregnancy and breastfeeding: a review of data from global safety surveillance. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;14:38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen LS, Viguera AC, McInerney KA, Freeman MP, Sosinsky AZ, Moustafa D, et al. Reproductive safety of second-generation antipsychotics: current data from the massachusetts general hospital national pregnancy registry for atypical antipsychotics. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173:263–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McKenna K, Koren G, Tetelbaum M, Wilton L, Shakir S, Diav-Citrin O, et al. Pregnancy outcome of women using atypical antipsychotic drugs: a prospective comparative study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:444–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadowski A, Todorow M, Yazdani Brojeni P, Koren G, Nulman I. Pregnancy outcomes following maternal exposure to second-generation antipsychotics given with other psychotropic drugs: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(7):e003062.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kulkarni J, Worsley R, Gilbert H, Gavrilidis E, Van Rheenen TE, Wang W, et al. A prospective cohort study of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy: the first 147 pregnancies and 100 one year old babies. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94788.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng M, Gao K, Ding Y, Ou J, Calabrese JR, Wu R, et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to atypical antipsychotics on postnatal development and growth of infants: a case-controlled, prospective study. Psychopharmacology. 2013;228:577–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bayley N. Bayley Scale of infant and toddler development. 3rd ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sutter-Dallay A-L, Bales M, Pambrun E, Glangeaud-Freudenthal NM-C, Wisner KL, Verdoux H. Impact of prenatal exposure to psychotropic drugs on neonatal outcome in infants of mothers with serious psychiatric illnesses. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:967–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huybrechts KF, Bateman BT, Desai RJ, Hernandez-Diaz S, Rough K, Mogun H, et al. Risk of neonatal drug withdrawal after intrauterine co-exposure to opioids and psychotropic medications: cohort study. BMJ. 2017;358:j3326.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bellet F, Beyens M-N, Bernard N, Beghin D, Elefant E, Vial T. Exposure to aripiprazole during embryogenesis: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24:368–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wichman CL. Atypical antipsychotic use in pregnancy: a retrospective review. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009;12:53–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC). Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects—Atlanta, Georgia, 1978-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:349–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Khoshnood B, Greenlees R, Loane M, Dolk H, EUROCAT Project Management Committee, EUROCAT Working Group. Paper 2: EUROCAT public health indicators for congenital anomalies in Europe. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91(1):16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Coppola D, Russo LJ, Kwarta RF, Varughese R, Schmider J. Evaluating the postmarketing experience of risperidone use during pregnancy: pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Drug Saf. 2007;30:247–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dev V, Krupp P. Adverse event profile and safety of clozapine. Rev Contemp Pharmacother. 1995;6:197–208.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bazire S. Psychotropic drug directory. Salisbury: Fivepin Limited; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bodén R, Lundgren M, Brandt L, Reutfors J, Kieler H. Antipsychotics during pregnancy: relation to fetal and maternal metabolic effects. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:715–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Newham JJ, Thomas SH, MacRitchie K, McElhatton PR, McAllister-Williams RH. Birth weight of infants after maternal exposure to typical and atypical antipsychotics: prospective comparison study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192:333–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sørensen MJ, Kjaersgaard MIS, Pedersen HS, Vestergaard M, Christensen J, Olsen J, et al. Risk of fetal death after treatment with antipsychotic medications during pregnancy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132280.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Babu GN, Desai G, Tippeswamy H, Chandra PS. Birth weight and use of olanzapine in pregnancy: a prospective comparative study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;30:331–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Brandlistuen RE, Ystrom E, Nulman I, Koren G, Nordeng H. Prenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: a sibling-controlled cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1702–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Damkier P, Pottegård A, dePont Christensen R, Hallas J. Annotations and reflections: pregnancy and paracetamol: methodological considerations on the study of associations between in utero exposure to drugs and childhood neurodevelopment. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;116:2–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Liew Z, Ritz B, Virk J, Olsen J. Maternal use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorders in childhood: a Danish national birth cohort study. Autism Res. 2016;9(9):951–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Liew Z, Ritz B, Rebordosa C, Lee P-C, Olsen J. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy, behavioral problems, and hyperkinetic disorders. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:313–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ornoy A. Neurobehavioral risks of SSRIs in pregnancy: comparing human and animal data. Reprod Toxicol. 2017;72:191–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Andrade C. Use of acetaminophen (paracetamol) during pregnancy and the risk of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77:e152–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gentile S, Fusco ML. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants exposed in utero to antipsychotics: a systematic review of published data. CNS Spectr. 2017;22:273–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Johnson KC, LaPrairie JL, Brennan PA, Stowe ZN, Newport DJ. Prenatal antipsychotic exposure and neuromotor performance during infancy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:787–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Wakil L, Perea E, Penaskovic K, Stuebe A, Meltzer-Brody S. Exacerbation of psychotic disorder during pregnancy in the context of medication discontinuation. Psychosomatics. 2013;54:290–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Petersen I, McCrea RL, Osborn DJP, Evans S, Pinfold V, Cowen PJ, et al. Discontinuation of antipsychotic medication in pregnancy: a cohort study. Schizophr Res. 2014;159:218–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Viguera AC, Whitfield T, Baldessarini RJ, Newport DJ, Stowe Z, Reminick A, et al. Risk of recurrence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer discontinuation. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1817–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Larsen ER, Saric K. Pregnancy and bipolar disorder: the risk of recurrence when discontinuing treatment with mood stabilisers: a systematic review. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2017;29:259–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lindahl V, Pearson JL, Colpe L. Prevalence of suicidality during pregnancy and the postpartum. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8:77–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hirsch L, Yang J, Bresee L, Jette N, Patten S, Pringsheim T. Second-generation antipsychotics and metabolic side effects: a systematic review of population-based studies. Drug Saf. 2017;40:771–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Deng C. Effects of antipsychotic medications on appetite, weight, and insulin resistance. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013;42:545–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Damkier.

Ethics declarations

This review does not contain individual-level data.

Conflicts of interest

Per Damkier and Poul Videbech declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This review was not funded.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damkier, P., Videbech, P. The Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics During Pregnancy: A Clinically Focused Review. CNS Drugs 32, 351–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0517-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0517-5