References
Shrier I. Comment on: “ Publication bias, with a focus on psychiatry: causes and solutions”. CNS Drugs. 2013. doi:10.1007/s40263-013-0098-2.
Turner EH. Publication bias, with a focus on psychiatry: causes and solutions. CNS Drugs. 2013;27:457–68.
Kerr N. HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2:196.
Chan A-W, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291:2457–65.
Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2009;302:977–84.
Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.
Chambers CD. Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex. 2013;49:609–10.
Acknowledgments
From 1998 to 2001, the author served as a medical reviewer at the US FDA. Subsequently, but ending in 2005, he provided outside consulting to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and GlaxoSmithKline. From 2004 to 2005, he was on the speaker’s bureaus of Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. No sources of funding were used to prepare this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, E.H. Author’s Reply to Shrier: “Publication Bias, With a Focus on Psychiatry: Causes and Solutions”. CNS Drugs 27, 775–776 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-013-0099-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-013-0099-1