Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban for Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Greece

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major healthcare concern that results in substantial morbidity and mortality with great economic burden for healthcare systems. Hence, the need for effective and efficient treatment of patients with VTE is important for both clinical and economic reasons. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to standard of care (SoC) with enoxaparin followed by dose-adjusted vitamin-K antagonists for the treatment of DVT and PE in Greece.

Methods

An existing Markov model was locally adapted from a third-party payer perspective to reflect the management and complications of DVT and PE in the course of 3-month cycles, up to death. The clinical inputs and utility values were extracted from published studies. Direct medical costs, obtained from local resources, were incorporated in the model and refer to year 2017. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was calculated. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was carried out to deal with uncertainty.

Results

The base-case analysis showed that rivaroxaban in 3- and 6-month treatment duration for DVT and PE, respectively, as this is the common clinical practice in Greece, was associated with a 0.02 and 0.01 increment in QALYs compared to SoC, respectively. Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced total cost in DVT (€85) but with an additional total cost in PE (€2) compared to SoC. Therefore, rivaroxaban was a dominant (less costly, more effective) and cost-effective (ICER: €177) alternative over SoC for the management of DVT and PE, respectively. PSA revealed that the probability of rivaroxaban being cost effective at a threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained was 99% and 81% for DVT and PE, respectively.

Conclusion

Rivaroxaban may represent a cost-effective option relative to SoC for the management of DVT and PE in Greece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moheimani F, Jackson DE. Venous thromboembolism: classification, risk factors, diagnosis, and management. ISRN Hematol. 2011;2011:124610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Heit JA. Venous thromboembolism: disease burden, outcomes and risk factors. JTH. 2005;3(8):1611–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Marchiori A, Davidson BL, Tiozzo F, et al. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. New Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2257–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruppert A, Steinle T, Lees M. Economic burden of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):65–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobesh PP. Economic burden of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29(8):943–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Venous thromboembolic diseases: the management of venous thromboembolic diseases and the role of thrombophilia testing. Clinical guidelines, CG144. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG144. Available from: Cited 18 Feb 2016.

  7. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, et al. ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2014;35(43):3033–69, 69a–69k.

  8. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, Blaivas A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2016;149(2):315–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti G, et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):160S–98S.

  10. Key NS, Kasthuri RS. Current treatment of venous thromboembolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(3):372–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia DA. Current therapeutic strategies and future perspectives for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16(31):3475–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Es N, Coppens M, Schulman S, Middeldorp S, Buller HR. Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials. Blood. 2014;124(12):1968–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perzborn E, Roehrig S, Straub A, Kubitza D, Mueck W, Laux V. Rivaroxaban: a new oral factor Xa inhibitor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(3):376–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kubitza D, Becka M, Voith B, Zuehlsdorf M, Wensing G. Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of single doses of BAY 59-7939, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Clin Pharm Therap. 2005;78(4):412–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, Brenner B, Buller HR, Decousus H, Gallus AS, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2499–510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW, Decousus H, Jacobson BF, Minar E, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. New Engl J Med. 2012;366(14):1287–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Bellen B, Bamber L, Correa de Carvalho F, Prins M, Wang M, Lensing AW. Reduction in the length of stay with rivaroxaban as a single-drug regimen for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(5):829–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bookhart BK, Haskell L, Bamber L, Wang M, Schein J, Mody SH. Length of stay and economic consequences with rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with DVT and PE: findings from the North American EINSTEIN clinical trial program. J Med Econ. 2014;17(10):691–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bamber L, Muston D, McLeod E, Guillermin A, Lowin J, Patel R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban compared with combined low molecular weight heparin/vitamin K antagonist. Thromb J. 2015;13:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kourlaba G, Rapti V, Alexopoulos A, Relakis J, Koumakis G, Chatzikou M, et al. Everolimus plus exemestane versus bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in Greece: an economic evaluation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maniadakis N, Kaitelidou D, Siskou O, Spinthouri M, Liaropoulos L, Fragoulakis B, et al. Economic evaluation of treatment strategies for patients suffering acute myocardial infarction in Greece. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2005;46(3):212–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tzanetakos C, Melidonis A, Verras C, Kourlaba G, Maniadakis N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lefebvre P, Coleman CI, Bookhart BK, Wang ST, Mody SH, Tran KN, et al. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Med Econ. 2014;17(1):52–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Jong LA, Dvortsin E, Janssen KJ, Postma MJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis for apixaban in the acute treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism in the Netherlands. Clin Therap 2017;39(2):288–302.e4.

  25. Seaman CD, Smith KJ, Ragni MV. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin anticoagulation for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a U.S. perspective. Thromb Res. 2013;132(6):647–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Briggs A, Sculpher M. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(4):397–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun X, Faunce T. Decision-analytical modelling in health-care economic evaluations. Eur J Health Econ. 2008;9(4):313–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcome Res. 2013;16(2):e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Venous thromboembolic diseases: the management of venous thromboembolic diseases and the role of thrombophilia testing. Clinical guidelines, CG144. 2015. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG144. Cited 20 Apr 2017.

  30. Condliffe R, Kiely DG, Gibbs JS, Corris PA, Peacock AJ, Jenkins DP, et al. Improved outcomes in medically and surgically treated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(10):1122–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316(7133):736–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lenert LA, Soetikno RM. Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: potential applications in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 1997;4(1):49–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Linkins L, O’Donnell M, Julian JA, Kearon C. Intracranial and fatal bleeding according to indication for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. JTH. 2010;8(10):2201–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Locadia M, Bossuyt PM, Stalmeier PF, Sprangers MA, van Dongen CJ, Middeldorp S, et al. Treatment of venous thromboembolism with vitamin K antagonists: patients’ health state valuations and treatment preferences. Thromb Haemost. 2004;92(6):1336–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marchetti M, Pistorio A, Barone M, Serafini S, Barosi G. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus warfarin for secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Med. 2001;111(2):130–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mayer E, Jenkins D, Lindner J, D’Armini A, Kloek J, Meyns B, et al. Surgical management and outcome of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results from an international prospective registry. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(3):702–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meads DM, McKenna SP, Doughty N, Das C, Gin-Sing W, Langley J, et al. The responsiveness and validity of the CAMPHOR Utility Index. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(6):1513–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Miniati M, Monti S, Bottai M, Scoscia E, Bauleo C, Tonelli L, et al. Survival and restoration of pulmonary perfusion in a long-term follow-up of patients after acute pulmonary embolism. Med (Baltimore). 2006;85(5):253–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Prandoni P, Villalta S, Bagatella P, Rossi L, Marchiori A, Piccioli A, et al. The clinical course of deep-vein thrombosis. Prospective long-term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients. Haematologica. 1997;82(4):423–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rivero-Arias O, Ouellet M, Gray A, Wolstenholme J, Rothwell PM, Luengo-Fernandez R. Mapping the modified Rankin scale (mRS) measurement into the generic EuroQol (EQ-5D) health outcome. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(3):341–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Prandoni P, Noventa F, Ghirarduzzi A, Pengo V, Bernardi E, Pesavento R, et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A prospective cohort study in 1,626 patients. Haematologica. 2007;92(2):199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Greek Ministry of Health. Drug price bulletin 2017. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.gr/articles/times-farmakwn/deltia-timwn. Cited 20 Feb 2017.

  43. Greek Ministry of Health. Diagnostic related groups Athens. Available from: http://kenicd.ehealthnet.gr/%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%BF%CE%B2%CE%BF%CE%BB%CE%B7.aspx. Cited 12 Jun 2017.

  44. National Organisation for HealthcareServices Provision. Official web site of EOPYY, 2017. Available from: http://www.eopyy.gov.gr/Home/StartPage?a_HomePage=Index. Cited 22 Jan 2017.

  45. Maniadakis N, Kourlaba G, Cokkinos DV, Angeli A, Kyriopoulos J. The economic burden of atherothrombosis in Greece: results from the THESIS study. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(4):655–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hellenic Statistical Authority (EL. STAT.). Inflation rates. Available from: http://www.statistics.gr/. Cited 12 Jun 2017.

  47. WHO. Choosing interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE): Cost-effectiveness thresholds 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/choice/costs/CER_thresholds/en/index.html. Cited 28 Apr 2017.

  48. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database. Available from: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/01/weodata/index.aspx. Cited 28 Apr 2017.

  49. Coleman CI, Limone BL, Bookhart BK, Mody SH, Nutescu EA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended duration anticoagulation with rivaroxaban to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2014;133(5):743–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Diamantopoulos A, Lees M, Wells PS, Forster F, Ananthapavan J, McDonald H. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for the prevention of postsurgical venous thromboembolism in Canada. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104(4):760–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Duran A, Sengupta N, Diamantopoulos A, Forster F, Kwong L, Lees M. Cost and outcomes associated with rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin for the prevention of postsurgical venous thromboembolism from a US payer’s perspective. J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):824–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Duran A, Sengupta N, Diamantopoulos A, Forster F, Kwong L, Lees M. Cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for prevention of post-surgical venous thromboembolism from a U.S. payer’s perspective. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(2):87–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. McDonald H, Diamantopoulos A, Wells P, Lees M, Folkerts K, Forster F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism: a Canadian analysis using the Ontario Ministry of Health Perspective. J Med Econ. 2012.

  54. Ryttberg L, Diamantopoulos A, Forster F, Lees M, Fraschke A, Bjorholt I. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus heparins for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee surgery in Sweden. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcome Res. 2011;11(5):601–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kleintjens J, Li X, Simoens S, Thijs V, Goethals M, Rietzschel ER, et al. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in the Belgian healthcare setting. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(10):909–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kourlaba G, Maniadakis N, Andrikopoulos G, Vardas P. Economic evaluation of rivaroxaban in stroke prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation in Greece. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014;12(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Lanitis T, Cotte FE, Gaudin AF, Kachaner I, Kongnakorn T, Durand-Zaleski I. Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in France: comparative cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban), warfarin, and aspirin. J Med Econ. 2014;17(8):587–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mensch A, Stock S, Stollenwerk B, Muller D. Cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in German patients with atrial fibrillation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(3):271–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Morais J, Aguiar C, McLeod E, Chatzitheofilou I, Fonseca Santos I, Pereira S. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in the Portuguese setting. Rev Port Cardiol. 2014;33(9):535–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Bayer Hellas for sponsoring this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Gourzoulidis.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by Bayer Hellas. However, the study sponsor had no input into the study design, data collection, data analysis, or writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

GGian received speaker honoraria from Bayer Hellas. NM received consulting fees from Bayer Hellas. MM received speaker honoraria from Bayer Hellas. TV received speaker honoraria from Bayer Hellas. None of the other authors has any personal or financial conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 496 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 464 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gourzoulidis, G., Kourlaba, G., Kakisis, J. et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban for Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Greece. Clin Drug Investig 37, 833–844 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-017-0540-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-017-0540-1

Navigation