Lane DA, Lip GYH. Use of the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores to aid decision making for thromboprophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012;126:860–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Mahajan R, Brooks AG, Sullivan T, Lim HS, Alasady M, Abed HS, et al. Importance of the underlying substrate in determining thrombus location in atrial fibrillation: implications for left atrial appendage closure. Heart Br Card Soc. 2012;98:1120–6.
Google Scholar
Ostermayer SH, Reisman M, Kramer PH, Matthews RV, Gray WA, Block PC, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO system) to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation: results from the international multi-center feasibility trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:9–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Holmes DR, Kar S, Price MJ, Whisenant B, Sievert H, Doshi SK, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2009;374:534–42.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Drummond M, Griffin A, Tarricone R. Economic evaluation for devices and drugs–same or different? Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2009;12:402–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Ciani O, Wilcher B, van Giessen A, Taylor RS. Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments. Health Econ. 2017;26(Suppl 1):13–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Boudard A, Martelli N, Prognon P, Pineau J. Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment? J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19:697–702.
Article
Google Scholar
Sorenson C, Drummond M, Bhuiyan Khan B. Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: disentangling the relationship. Clin Outcomes Res CEOR. 2013;5:223–34.
Article
Google Scholar
Martelli N, Devaux C, van den Brink H, Pineau J, Prognon P, Borget I. A systematic review of the level of evidence in economic evaluations of medical devices: the example of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0144892.
Article
Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2010;8:336–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:16.
Article
Google Scholar
Teerawattananon Y, Russell S, Mugford M. A systematic review of economic evaluation literature in Thailand: are the data good enough to be used by policy-makers? PharmacoEconomics. 2007;25:467–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Google Scholar
Cooper N, Coyle D, Abrams K, Mugford M, Sutton A. Use of evidence in decision models: an appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:245–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Ofman JJ, Sullivan SD, Neumann PJ, Chiou C-F, Henning JM, Wade SW, et al. Examining the value and quality of health economic analyses: implications of utilizing the QHES. J Manag Care Pharm JMCP. 2003;9:53–61.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Micieli A, Wijeysundera HC, Qiu F, Atzema CL, Singh SM. A decision analysis of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion relative to novel and traditional oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Med Decis Mak Int J Soc Med Decis Mak. 2016;36:366–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Reddy VY, Akehurst RL, Armstrong SO, Amorosi SL, Brereton N, Hertz DS, et al. Cost effectiveness of left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device for atrial fibrillation patients with absolute contraindications to warfarin. Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2016;18:979–86.
Google Scholar
Singh SM, Micieli A, Wijeysundera HC. Economic evaluation of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, dabigatran, and warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2013;127:2414–23.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Lee VW-Y, Tsai RB-C, Chow IH-I, Yan BP-Y, Kaya MG, Park J-W, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:167.
Reddy VY, Akehurst RL, Armstrong SO, Amorosi SL, Beard SM, Holmes DR. Time to cost-effectiveness following stroke reduction strategies in AF: warfarin versus NOACs versus LAA closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2728–39.
Article
Google Scholar
Freeman JV, Hutton DW, Barnes GD, Zhu RP, Owens DK, Garber AM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage in atrial fibrillation based on results from PROTECT AF versus PREVAIL. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e003407.
Article
Google Scholar
Saw J, Bennell MC, Singh SM, Wijeysundera HC. Cost-effectiveness of left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients with contraindications to anticoagulation. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32:1355.e9–1355.e14.
Article
Google Scholar
Health Quality Ontario. Left atrial appendage closure device with delivery system: a health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017;17:1–106.
Google Scholar
Maisel WH. Left atrial appendage occlusion–closure or just the beginning? N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2601–3.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Abrishami P, Boer A, Horstman K. Value in co-creation: subjecting innovative in-hospital technologies to multi-stakeholder appraisal. Int J Hosp Based Health Technol Assess. 2017;2017:12–30.
Google Scholar