Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 733–744 | Cite as

Horses for Courses: Moving India towards Universal Health Coverage through Targeted Policy Design

  • Dayashankar Maurya
  • Altaf Virani
  • S. Rajasulochana
Current Opinion


The debate on how India’s health system should move towards universal health coverage was (meant to be) put to rest by the recent National Health Policy 2017. However, the new policy is silent about tackling bottlenecks mentioned in the said policy proposal. It aims to provide universal access to free primary care by strengthening the public system, and to secondary and tertiary care through strategic purchasing from the private sector, to overcome deficiencies in public provisioning in the short run. Yet, in doing so, it ignores critical factors needed to replicate successful models of public healthcare delivery from certain states that it hopes to emulate. The policy also overestimates the capacity of the public sector and downplays the challenges observed in purchasing secondary care. Drawing from literature in policy design, we emphasize that primary, secondary and tertiary care have distinct characteristics, and their provision requires separate approaches or policy tools depending on the context. Public provisioning, contract purchasing and insurance mechanisms are different policy tools that have to be matched with the context and characteristics of the policy arena. Given the current challenges of India’s health system, we argue that tertiary care services are most suitable for insurance-based purchasing, while the public sector should concentrate on building the required capacities to dominate the provisioning of secondary care and fill gaps in primary care delivery, for India to achieve its universal coverage ambitions.


Author Contributions

Dayashankar Maurya was the lead author and conceptual architect of this paper. Both Dayashankar Maurya and Altaf Virani contributed to the development, drafting and critical revisions of the manuscript. All three authors participated in the writing and in responding to reviewer comments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards


No funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Dayashankar Maurya, Altaf Virani and S. Rajasulochana declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Peters DH, Yazbeck AS, Sharma RR, Ramana GNV, Pritchett LH, Wagstaff A. Better health systems for India's poor: findings, analysis, and options. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank. 2002.
  2. 2.
    MoHFW. National Health Policy 2002. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rao KS. Delivery of health services in the public sector. Financing and delivery of health care services in India. New Delhi: National Commission on Macroeconomic and Health, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2005. p. 43–64.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sen G. Universal Health Coverage in India. Econ Polit Wkly. 2012;47(8):45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peters DH, editor. Better health systems for India’s poor: findings, analysis, and options. Washington DC: World Bank Publications; 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Planning Commission. High level expert group report on universal health coverage for India. New Delhi: Public Health Foundation of India; 2011.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MoHFW. National Health Policy 2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bali AS, Ramesh M. Designing effective healthcare: Matching policy tools to problems in China. Public Adm Dev. 2017;37(1):40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu X, Ramesh M. Market imperfections, government imperfections, and policy mixes: policy innovations in Singapore. Policy Sci. 2014;47(3):305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramesh M. Autonomy and control in public hospital reforms in Singapore. Am Rev Public Adm. 2008;38(1):62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2016: Monitoring Health for the SDGs Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    United Nations India Country Team. Universal Health Coverage. UN Resident Coordinator’s Office in New Delhi. 2015. Accessed 24 September 2017.
  13. 13.
    Bali AS, Ramesh M. Health care reforms in India: getting it wrong. Public Policy Adm. 2015;30(3–4):300–19.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bali AS, Ramesh M. Mark time: India’s march to universal health care coverage. Soc Policy Adm. 2015;49(6):718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balabanova D, Mills A, Conteh L, Akkazieva B, Banteyerga H, Dash U, Gilson L, Harmer A, Ibraimova A, Islam Z, Kidanu A. Good health at low cost 25 years on: lessons for the future of health systems strengthening. The Lancet. 2013;381(9883):2118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bali AS. Health System Design and Governance in India and Thailand. Doctoral dissertation. Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore; 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhojani U, Beerenahalli TS, Devadasan R, Munegowda CM, Devadasan N, Criel B, Kolsteren P. No longer diseases of the wealthy: prevalence and health-seeking for self-reported chronic conditions among urban poor in Southern India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bisht R, Virani A. Globalization and the Health of a Megacity: the case of Mumbai. In: Hodges S, Rao M, editors. Public Health and Private Wealth: stem cells, surrogates and other strategic bodies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2016. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199463374.003.0005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Banerjee A, Deaton A, Duflo E. Health care delivery in rural Rajasthan. Econ aPolit Wkly. 2004;28:944–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seeberg J, Pannarunothai S, Padmawati RS, Trisnantoro L, Barua N, Pandav CS. Treatment seeking and health financing in selected poor urban neighbourhoods in India, Indonesia and Thailand. Soc Sci Med. 2014;28(102):49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Commission Planning. Report of the Steering Committee on health for twelfth five-year plan. New Delhi: Health Division, Planning Commission of India; 2012.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berman P, Ahuja R, Bhandari L. The impoverishing effect of healthcare payments in India: new methodology and findings. Econ aPolit Wkly. 2010;17:65–71.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Insurance Regulatory Development Authority. Annual Report 2015-16. 2016. Accessed 24 Sep 2017.
  24. 24.
    MOLE and MOF. Expenditure budgets of the Ministry of Labour and Ministry of Finance, 2016-17; 2015-16; 2014-15; 2013-14; 2012-13. New Delhi: Ministry of Labour and Employment and Ministry of Finance, Government of India.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Asher M, Vora Y, Maurya D. An analysis of selected pension and health care initiatives for informal sector workers in India. Soc Policy Adm. 2015;49(6):738–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maurya D, Lai A. Challenges in use of Public Private Partnership as a Policy Tool in Healthcare. In: Popejoy M, editor. Global Health Policy. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jega FM. Contracting out to improve maternal health: evaluating the quality of care under the Chiranjeevi Yojana in Gujarat, India. Liverpool: University of Liverpool; 2007.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Murray SF, Hunter BM, Bisht R, Ensor T, Bick D. Effects of demand-side financing on utilisation, experiences and outcomes of maternity care in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bearing Point. Private Voluntary Health insurance in India: promise and reality. United States Agency for International Development; 2008.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gupta MD, Muraleedharan V. Universal health coverage. Econ Polit Wkly. 2014;49(35):29.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    NHSRC. National Health Accounts Estimates for India (2013-14). New Delhi: National Health Systems Resource Centre, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2016.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    MHA. SRS Statistical Report 2015. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2015.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    IIPS. SRS Statistical Report 2015. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2015.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nag M. Political awareness as a factor in accessibility of health services: a case study of rural Kerala and West Bengal. Econ Polit Wkly. 1989;25:417–26.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Padmanaban P, Raman PS, Mavalankar DV. Innovations and challenges in reducing maternal mortality in Tamil Nadu, India. J Health Popu Nutr. 2009;27(2):202.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muraleedharan VR, Dash U, et al. Tamil Nadu 1980s–2005: a success story in India. In: Balabanova D, McKee M, Mills A, editors. Good health at low cost’ 25 years on. London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2011.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gupta MD, Desikachari BR, Shukla R, Somanathan TV, Padmanaban P, Datta KK. How might India’s public health systems be strengthened? lessons from Tamil Nadu. Econ Polit Wkly. 2010;6:46–60.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kumar V, Mishra AJ, Verma S. Health planning through Village Health Sanitation and Nutrition Committees: a qualitative study from India. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29(6):703–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Srivastava A, Gope R, Nair N, Rath S, Rath S, Sinha R, Sahoo P, Biswal PM, Singh V, Nath V, Sachdev HP. Are village health sanitation and nutrition committees fulfilling their roles for decentralised health planning and action? A mixed methods study from rural eastern India. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Berendes S, Heywood P, Oliver S, Garner P. Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(4):e1000433.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Powell-Jackson T, Acharya A, Mills A. An assessment of the quality of primary health care in India. Econ Polit Wkly. 2013;48(19):53–61.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Das J, Hammer J. Money for nothing: the dire straits of medical practice in Delhi, India. J Dev Econ. 2007;83(1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sundararaman T, Muraleedharan VR, Mukhopadhyay I. NSSO 71st round data on health and beyond. Econ Polit Wkly. 2016;51(3):85.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Das J, Alaka H, Mohpal A, Muralidharan K. Quality and accountability in health care delivery: audit-study evidence from primary care in India. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106(12):3765–99. doi: 10.1257/aer.20151138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pesec M, Ratcliffe HL, Karlage A, Hirschhorn LR, Gawande A, Bitton A. Primary health care that works: the Costa Rican experience. Health Aff. 2017;36(3):531–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Prinja S, Chauhan AS, Karan A, Kaur G, Kumar R. Impact of publicly financed health insurance schemes on healthcare utilization and financial risk protection in India: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170996.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Karan A, Yip W, Mahal A. Extending health insurance to the poor in India: an impact evaluation of Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana on out of pocket spending for healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2017;31(181):83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Selvaraj S, Karan AK. Why publicly-financed health insurance schemes are ineffective in providing financial risk protection. Econ Polit Wkly. 2012;47(11):61–8.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mitchell A, Mahal A, Bossert T. Healthcare utilisation in rural Andhra Pradesh. Econ Polit Wkly. 2011;29:15–9.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gupta I, Chowdhury S, Trivedi M, Prinja S. Do health coverage schemes ensure financial protection from hospitalization expenses? Evidence from eight districts in India. J Soc Econ Dev. 2017;19(1):83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Asher M, Bali AS. Public pension programs in Southeast Asia: an assessment. Asian Economic Policy Review. 2015;10(2):225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    La Forgia G, Nagpal S. Government-sponsored health insurance in India: are you covered?. Washington DC: World Bank Publications; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wagstaff A, Yip W, Lindelow M, Hsiao WC. China’s health system and its reform: a review of recent studies. Health Econ. 2009; 18(S2):S7–S23.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Limwattananon S, Tangcharoensathien V, Prakongsai P. Catastrophic and poverty impacts of health payments: results from national household surveys in Thailand. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(8):600–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fan VY, Karan A, Mahal A. State health insurance and out-of-pocket health expenditures in Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Health Care Financ Econ. 2012;1:1–27.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rao M, Katyal A, Singh PV, Samarth A, Bergkvist S, Kancharla M, Wagstaff A, Netuveli G, Renton A. Changes in addressing inequalities in access to hospital care in Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra states of India: a difference-in-differences study using repeated cross-sectional surveys. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):e004471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sood N, Bendavid E, Mukherji A, Wagner Z, Nagpal S, Mullen P. Government health insurance for people below poverty line in India: quasi-experimental evaluation of insurance and health outcomes. BMJ. 2014;25(349):g5114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Maurya D. Inter-organizational relations in public-private partnerships: national health insurance in India. Doctoral dissertation. Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore; 2015.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Blomqvist Å. Public-sector health care financing. In: Glied S, Smith PC, editors. The Oxford handbook of health economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238828.013.0012.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jalan J, Murgai R. An effective ‘targeting shortcut’? An assessment of the 2002 below-poverty line census method. In: Paper delivered at a conference on Sustainable Development and Livelihoods, organized by the Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, February 2007 (Vol. 6).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ram F, Mohanty SK, Ram U. Understanding the distribution of BPL cards: all-India and selected states. Econ Polit Wkly. 2009;14:66–71.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Drèze J, Khera R. The BPL census and a possible alternative. Econ Polit Wkly. 2010;27:54–63.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Aggarwal A. Achieving equity in health through community-based health insurance: India’s experience with a large CBHI programme. J Dev Stud. 2011;47(11):1657–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sun C. An analysis of RSBY enrolment patterns: Preliminary evidence and lessons from the early experience. India’s health insurance scheme for the poor: evidence from the early experience of the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research; 2011.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Nandi A, Ashok A, Laxminarayan R. The socioeconomic and institutional determinants of participation in India’s health insurance scheme for the poor. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66296.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    MoHFW. Situational analysis: backdrop to the National Health Policy 2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2017.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Swarup A. Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY)… some initial trends. RSBY Working Paper. New Delhi: Ministry of Labour and Employment; 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.T A Pai Management InstituteManipalIndia
  2. 2.Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations