Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 795–803 | Cite as

Robustness and Effectiveness of the Triage System in the Pediatric Context

  • Marcello Montefiori
  • Enrico di Bella
  • Lucia Leporatti
  • Paolo Petralia
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

The increasing use of emergency departments (EDs) potentially compromises their effectiveness and quality. The evaluation of the performance of the triage code system in a pediatric context is important because waiting time affects the quality of care for acutely ill patients.

Objective

In this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and robustness of the triage code system in a pediatric context and identify the determinants of waiting times for urgent and non-urgent patients.

Methods

Data regarding 37,767 pediatric patients who accessed the ED of a major Italian pediatric hospital in 2015 were investigated in order to study patient numbers and waiting times. The determinants of waiting times for urgent and non-urgent patients, as well as variables referring to the “supply side,” such as periods of staff shortage, were analyzed using a survival analysis framework.

Results

For urgent patients, the waiting time between triage and the first physician assessment is generally below the standard threshold of 15 min and this is not affected by the number of non-urgent patients waiting for care. Conversely, the waiting time for non-urgent patients is affected by ED flow, periods of staff shortage, and non-clinical variables (age and nationality).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the triage level assignation system is effective in terms of safety for urgent patients. The current ED organization adequately fulfills its primary goal of providing healthcare for acutely ill patients.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank E.O. Gaslini for his invaluable cooperation in providing the data.

Authors’ contributions

Although all authors contributed to the conception of the study, the design of the study, and writing of the manuscript, MM and PP can be identified as the guarantors for the overall content and interpretation of the results. EdB and LL are responsible for the data analysis. PP is the provider of the data used for the analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors (Marcello Montefiori, Enrico di Bella, Lucia Leporatti, and Paolo Petralia) have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical statement

The study was carried out as part of routine checks conducted in the ED of the hospital and so ethical approval was not required. As is the case with all studies conducted in the hospital environment, the management of the hospital approved the study protocol. The management is responsible for ensuring the ethical aspects of all hospital activities.

Informed consent

On entering the hospital, all patients sign an informed consent form regarding treatment in the hospital.

References

  1. 1.
    Burnett MG, Grover SA. Use of the emergency department for non-urgent care during regular business hours. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154(9):1345–51.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sempere-Selva T, Peiró S, Sendra-Pina P, Martínez-Espín C, López-Aguilera I. Inappropriate use of an accident and emergency department: magnitude, associated factors, and reasons—an approach with explicit criteria. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(6):568–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moskop JC, Sklar DP, Geiderman JM, Schears RM, Bookman KJ. Emergency department crowding, part 1—concept, causes, and moral consequences. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(5):605–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCarthy ML, Aronsky D, Jones ID, Miner JR, Band RA, Baren JM, Desmond JS, Baumlin KM, Ding R, Shesser R. The Emergency Department occupancy rate: a simple measure of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(1):15–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoot NR, Aronsky D. Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes effects and solutions. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(2):126–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cremonesi P, Montefiori M, Resta M. Hospital emergency department: an insight by means of quantitative methods. Open Pharmacoeconom Health Econom J. 2012;4:26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun BC, Hsia RY, Weiss RE, Zingmond D, Liang LJ, Han W, Asch SM. Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(6):605–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallagher EJ, Lynn SG. The etiology of medical gridlock: causes of emergency department overcrowding in New York City. J Emerg Med. 1990;8:785–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Espinosa G, Miro O, Sanchez M, Coll-vinent B, Millá J. Effects of external and internal factors on emergency department overcrowding [letter]. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:693–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olshaker JS, Rathlev NK. Emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion: the impact and potential solutions of extended boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2006;30:351–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    di Bella E, Gandullia L, Leporatti L, Montefiori M, Orcamo P. Ranking and prioritization of emergency departments based on multi-indicator systems. Soc Indic Res. 2016;. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1537-5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(50):892–8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl20100892.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levaggi R, Montefiori M. Definition of a prospective payment system to reimburse emergency departments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):409. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi J, Claudius I. Decrease in emergency department length of stay as a result of triage pulse oximetry. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(6):412–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abanses JC, Dowd MD, Simon SD, Sharma V. Impact of rapid influenza testing at triage on management of febrile infants and young children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(3):145–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karpas A, Hennes H, Walsh-Kelly CM. Utilization of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurses in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(2):130–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doyle SL, Kingsnorth J, Guzzetta CE, Jahnke SA, McKenna JC, Brown K. Outcomes of implementing rapid triage in the pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Nur. 2012;38(1):30–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barata I, Brown KM, Fitzmaurice L, Griffin ES, Snow SK, Shook JE, et al. Best practices for improving flow and care of pediatric patients in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gilboy N, Tanabe T, Travers D, Rosenau AM. Emergency severity index (ESI): a triage tool for emergency department care. Edition Rockville MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2011. https://www.ahrq.gov. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  20. 20.
    Baker DW, Stevens CD, Brook RH. Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physician. Causes and consequences. JAMA. 1991;266:1085–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Keane D, Rauch L, Luce JM. Consequences of queuing for care at a public hospital emergency department. JAMA. 1991;266:1091–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stock LM, Bradley GE, Lewis RJ, Baker DW, Sipsey J, Stevens CD. Patients who leave emergency departments without being seen by a physician: magnitude of the problem in Los Angeles County. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23:294–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arendt KW, Sadosty AT, Weaver AL, Brent CR, Boie ET. The left-without-being-seen patients: what would keep them from leaving? Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:317–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kyriacou DN, Ricketts V, Dyne PL, McCollough MD, Talan DA. A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(3):326–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cremonesi P, di Bella E, Montefiori M, Persico L. The robustness and effectiveness of the triage system at times of overcrowding and the extra costs due to inappropriate use of emergency departments. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(5):507–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schull MJ, Kiss A, Szalai JP. The effect of low-complexity patients on emergency department waiting times. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):257–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brecher D. Reliability of the emergency severity index in the pediatric population. J Emerg Nur. 2004;30(5):402–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baumann MR, Strout TD. Evaluation of the emergency severity index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(3):219–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Timm NL, Ho ML, Luria JW. Pediatric emergency department overcrowding and impact on patient flow outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(9):32–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Travers DA, Waller AE, Katznelson J, Agans R. Reliability and validity of the emergency severity index for pediatric triage. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(9):843–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cain P, Waldrop RD, Jones J. Improved pediatric patient flow in a general emergency department by altering triage criteria. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:65–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Prince M, Worth C. A study of ‘inappropriate’ attendances to a paediatric accident and emergency department. J Public Health. 1992;14(2):177–82.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Franco SM, Mitchell CK, Buzon RM. Primary care physician access and gatekeeping: a key to reducing emergency department use. Clin Pediatr. 1997;36(2):63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Italian ministry of Health. Pronto Soccorso e sistema 118 Milestone 13—Definizione del sistema di valutazione dei pazienti (triage PS e 118) Progetto Mattoni SSN, Mattone 11. 2007. https://www.mattoni.salute.gov.it. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  35. 35.
    McCarthy ML, Zeger SL, Ding R, Levin SR, Desmond JS, Lee J, Aronsky D. Crowding delays treatment and lengthens emergency. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(4):492–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maurice SC, O’Donnell JJ, Beattie TF. Emergency analgesia in the pediatric population Part I: current practice and perspectives. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:4–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ferrante P, Cuttini M, Zangardi T, Tomasello C, Messi G, Pirozzi N, Benini F. Pain management policies and practices in pediatric emergency care: a nationwide survey of Italian hospitals. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mohsin M, Bauman A, Ieraci S. Is there equity in emergency medical care? Waiting times and walk-outs in South Western Sydney hospital emergency departments. Aust Health Rev. 1998;21(3):133–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Goodacre S, Webster A. Who waits longest in the emergency department and who leaves without being seen? Emerg Med J. 2005;22(2):93–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pileggi C, Raffaele G, Angelillo IF. Paediatric utilization of an emergency department in Italy. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16(5):565–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vedovetto A, Soriani N, Merlo E, Gregori D. The burden of inappropriate emergency department pediatric visits: why Italy needs an urgent reform. Health Serv Res. 2014;49(4):1290–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Farchi S, Polo A, Franco F, Di Lallo D, Guasticchi G. Primary paediatric care models and non-urgent emergency department utilization: an area-based cohort study. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Piccotti E, Magnani M, Tubino B, Sartini M, Di Pietro A. Assessment of the Triage System in a Pediatric Emergency Department A pilot study on critical code. J Prev Med Hyg. 2008;49(3):120–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Nick TG. Comparison of the national emergency department overcrowding scale and the emergency department work index for quantifying emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(5):513–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly
  3. 3.IRCCS Istituto Giannina GasliniGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations