Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 673–690 | Cite as

India’s Proposed Universal Health Coverage Policy: Evidence for Age Structure Transition Effect and Fiscal Sustainability

Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

India’s High Level Expert Group on Universal Health Coverage in 2011 recommended a universal, public-funded and national health coverage policy. As a plausible forward-looking macroeconomic reform in the health sector, this policy proposal on universal health coverage (UHC) needs to be evaluated for age structure transition effect and fiscal sustainability to strengthen its current design and future implementation.

Objective

Macroeconomic analyses of the long-term implications of age structure transition and fiscal sustainability on India’s proposed UHC policy.

Methods

A new measure of age-specific UHC is developed by combining the age profile of public and private health consumption expenditure by using the National Transfer Accounts methodology. Different projections of age-specific public health expenditure are calculated over the period 2005–2100 to account for the age structure transition effect. The projections include changes in: (1) levels of the expenditure as gross domestic product grows, (2) levels and shape of the expenditure as gross domestic product grows and expenditure converges to that of developed countries (or convergence scenario) based on the Lee–Carter model of forecasting mortality rates, and (3) levels of the expenditure as India moves toward a UHC policy. Fiscal sustainability under each health expenditure projection is determined by using the measures of generational imbalance and sustainability gap in the Generational Accounting methodology.

Results

Public health expenditure is marked by age specificities and the elderly population is costlier to support for their healthcare needs in the future. Given the discount and productivity growth rates, the proposed UHC is not fiscally sustainable under India’s current fiscal policies except for the convergence scenario. However, if the income elasticity of public expenditure on social welfare and health expenditure is less than one, fiscal sustainability of the UHC policy is attainable in all scenarios of projected public health expenditures. These new results strengthen the proposed UHC policy by accounting for age structure transition effect and justifying its sustainability within the framework of India’s current fiscal policies.

Conclusion

The age structure transition effect is important to incorporate the age-specific cost and benefit of the proposed UHC policy, especially as India moves toward an ageing society. Fiscal sustainability is essential to ensure that the proposed UHC is implementable on a long-term basis and within the framework of current fiscal policies.

References

  1. 1.
    Auerbach AJ, Kotlikoff LJ. The methodology of generational accounting. In: Auerbach AJ, Kotlikoff LJ, Leibfritz W, editors. Generational accounting around the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1999. p. 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonin H, Patxot C. Generational accounting as a tool to assess fiscal sustainability: an overview of the methodology. Discussion Paper No. 99. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burnside C. Theoretical prerequisites for fiscal sustainability analysis. In: Burnside C, editor. Fiscal sustainability in theory and practice. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2015. p. 11–33.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cental Statistical Office. Key indicators of social consumption in India: health, 2014. The National Sample Survey 71st Round (January–June 2014) on Social Consumption in India: Health. National Sample Survey Organisation, Government of India (New Delhi): Available from: http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/nss_pr_health_30june15.pdf. Accessed 5 Jul 2015.
  5. 5.
    Government of India. National Health Accounts India 2004–05. New Delhi: National Accounts Cell, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta I, Chowdhury S. Financing for health coverage in India: issues and concerns. IEG Working Paper No. 346. New Delhi: Institute for Economic Growth; 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mason A, Lee R. Introducing age into national accounts. In: Lee R, Mason A, editors. Population aging and the generational economy: global perspectives. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar; 2011. p. 55–78.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mason A, Lee R, Jiang JX. Demographic dividends, human capital, and savings. J Econom Ageing. 2016;7:106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mason C, Miller T. Public health care expenditure for NTA countries (version 4). Berkeley (USA): Department of Demography, University of California; 2013.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mor N, Kalita A. Missing links in universal health care, The Hindu, November 12, 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mukherjee S. Health and health care in India: current scenario and new challenges. In: Mahendra Dev S, editor. India development report 2015. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2015. pp. 205–220.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Narayana MR. Impact of population ageing on sustainability of India’s fiscal policies: a generational accounting approach. J Econom Ageing. 2014;3:71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Planning Commission. High level expert group report on universal health coverage for India. New Delhi: Government of India; 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prinja S, Chauhan AS, Angell B, et al. A systematic review of the state of economic evaluation for health care in India. Appl Health Econ Health Pol. 2015;13:595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rao MG, Choudhury M. Health care financing reforms in India, Working Paper No. 2012-100 (March 2012). New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy; 2012.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rao MG, Choudhury M, Anand M. Resource devolution from the centre to states: enhancing the revenue capacity of states for implementation of essential health interventions, MPRA Paper No. 24387, 13 August 2010. Available from: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/24387/. Accessed 24 Oct 2014.
  17. 17.
    Sen A, Pickett J, Burns LR. The health insurance sector in India: history and opportunities. In: Burns LR, editor. India’s healthcare industry: innovation in delivery, financing, and manufacturing. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 361–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sen G. Universal health coverage in India: a long and winding road. Econ Politic Wkly. 2012;XLVIII:45–52.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stabile M, Thomson S. The changing role of government in financing health care: an international perspective. J Econ Lit. 2014;52:480–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    United Nations. National Transfer Accounts manual: measuring and analysing the generational economy, ESA/P.WP/226. New York: Population Division, and Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    United Nations. World population prospects: the 2012 revision. New York: Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2013.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Health Organization. Research on universal health coverage: World Health Report 2013. Luxembourg: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Young JC. Excel file for GA calculation-revised health expenditure (2014). http://www.ntaccounts.org/web/nta/show/Generational%20Accounts%20Project. Accessed 15 June 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Economic Studies and PolicyInstitute for Social and Economic ChangeBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations