Productivity Losses Associated with Head and Neck Cancer Using the Human Capital and Friction Cost Approaches
- 184 Downloads
Previous studies suggest that productivity losses associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) are higher than in other cancers. These studies have only assessed a single aspect of productivity loss, such as temporary absenteeism or premature mortality, and have only used the Human Capital Approach (HCA). The Friction Cost Approach (FCA) is increasingly recommended, although has not previously been used to assess lost production from HNC. The aim of this study was to estimate the lost productivity associated with HNC due to different types of absenteeism and premature mortality, using both the HCA and FCA.
Survey data on employment status were collected from 251 HNC survivors in Ireland and combined with population-level survival estimates and national wage data. The cost of temporary and permanent time off work, reduced working hours and premature mortality using both the HCA and FCA were calculated.
Estimated total productivity losses per employed person of working age were EUR253,800 using HCA and EUR6800 using FCA. The main driver of HCA costs was premature mortality (38 % of total) while for FCA it was temporary time off (73 % of total).
The productivity losses associated with head and neck cancer are substantial, and return to work assistance could form an important part of rehabilitation. Use of both the HCA and FCA approaches allowed different drivers of productivity losses to be identified, due to the different assumptions of the two methods. For future estimates of productivity losses, the use of both approaches may be pragmatic.
KeywordsNeck Cancer Productivity Loss Premature Mortality Wage Growth Human Capital Approach
We thank the study participants and the consultants and their teams who assisted with reviewing subjects’ details. We are grateful to the following: Michal Molcho for participation in the ICE Steering Committee; Phyllis Butow for participation in the SuN Steering Committee; and National Cancer Registry Ireland staff involved in collection and processing of cancer registrations.
Financial and other support
This work was funded by a Health Research Board (HRB) Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement (ICE) Award, which funds post-doctoral fellowships for Alison Pearce, Audrey Alforque Thomas and Aileen Timmons (ICE/2012/9). The SuN study survey development and data collection was funded by an HRB project grant (HRA/2009/262).
Conflicts of interest
Alison Pearce, Paul Hanly, Aileen Timmons, Paul Walsh, Ciaran O’Neill, Eleanor O’Sullivan, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Audrey Thomas, Pamela Gallagher and Linda Sharp report no conflicts of interest.
All authors reviewed and provided expert input to the analysis protocol, interpretation of results and drafts of the manuscript. In addition, AP cleaned the data, conducted the analysis and drafted the manuscript. PH suggested and advised on the methodology and assisted with the analysis and interpretation. AT conducted the survey of head and neck cancer patients. PW analysed the National Cancer Registry data. LS, AT, RGH, CON and PG obtained funding. LS initiated the project, she was Principal Investigator of the SuN survey study, and is the guarantor for the overall content.
- 1.National Cancer Registry Ireland. Cancers of the head and neck. Cancer trends No. 10. National Cancer Registry Ireland: Cork; 2011.Google Scholar
- 3.Adelstein DJ, Ridge JA, Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, D’Souza G, Gravitt PE, et al. Head and neck squamous cell cancer and the human papillomavirus: summary of a National Cancer Institute State of the Science Meeting, November 9–10, 2008, Washington, DC. Head Neck. 2009;31(11):1393–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, van Bleek WJ, Leemans CR, de Bree R. Employment and return to work in head and neck cancer survivors. Oral Oncology. 2010;46:56–60.Google Scholar
- 8.Pearce AM, Timmons A, O’Sullivan E, Gallagher P, Gooberman-Hill R, Thomas AA, et al. Long-term workforce participation patterns following head and neck cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2014 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 10.Ramirez MJF, Ferriol EE, Domenech FG, Llatas MC, Suarez-Varela MM, Martinez RL. Psychosocial adjustment in patients surgically treated for laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):92–7.Google Scholar
- 11.Weisbrod B. Economics of public health. Philadelphia: University of Pannsylvania Press; 1961.Google Scholar
- 16.Ekwueme DU, Chesson HW, Zhang KB, Balamurugan A. Years of potential life lost and productivity costs because of cancer mortality and for specific cancer sites where Human Papillomavirus may be a risk factor for carcinogenesis—United States, 2003. Cancer. 2008;113(10 suppl):2936–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Borget I, Abramowitz L, Mathevet P. Economic burden of HPV-related cancers in France. Vaccine. 2011;29(32):5245–9.Google Scholar
- 19.Citizens Information Board. Sick leave and sick pay. 2013. http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/employment/employment_rights_and_conditions/leave_and_holidays/sick_leave.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2013.
- 20.Office for National Statistics. Standard occupational classification 2010. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/classifications/current-standard-classifications/soc2010/index.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2013.
- 21.Central Statistics Office. National employment survey. NSA06: mean and median hourly earnings by employment status, sex, occupation, year and statistic. 2013. http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/Define.asp?maintable=NSA06&PLanguage=0. Accessed 19 Nov 2013.
- 22.The Economic and Social Research Institute. Irish economy. 2012. http://www.esri.ie/irish_economy/. Accessed 10 July 2013.
- 23.Health Information and Quality Authority. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland. In: Health Information and Quality Authority, editor. Health Information and Quality Authority; 2010.Google Scholar
- 24.Hanly P, Koopmanschap MA, Sharp L. The friction cost approach in a changing macroeconomic environment: the case of colorectal cancer productivity costs. TBC. Draft. [under review].Google Scholar
- 26.Central Statistics Office. Irish life tables No. 15, 2005–2007. Dublin: Central Statistics Office; 2009.Google Scholar
- 33.Liljas B. How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(1 (Part 1)):1–7.Google Scholar