Abstract
Background
Patients with psoriasis face numerous treatment and self-management decisions. Shared decision making is a novel approach where patients’ preferences and values are considered in cooperation with healthcare professionals before making treatment decisions.
Objective
The objective of this systematic review was to explore what is illuminated in psoriasis research regarding shared decision making, and to estimate the effects of shared decision-making interventions in this context.
Methods
Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies were eligible for inclusion. We searched six electronic databases up to January 2018. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and quality criteria. The SPIDER framework was used to identify eligibility criteria for study inclusion. Narrative and thematic syntheses were utilized to identify prominent themes emerging from the data.
Results
A total of 23 studies were included in the review. Of these, we included 18 studies (19 papers) to describe what was illuminated with regard to shared decision making in psoriasis research. Four major themes emerged: interpersonal communication; exchange of competence and knowledge; different world view; and involvement and preference, organized under two analytical themes; “Co-creation of decisions” and “Organization of treatment and treatment needs”. For shared decision-making effects, we included four controlled studies. These varied in scope and interventional length and showed limited use of shared decision making-specific outcome measures, reflecting the early stage of the literature. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-synthesis was not justified.
Conclusions
There appears to be a need to strengthen the relationship between medical doctors and patients with psoriasis. The evident lack of knowledge about each other’s competence and the lack of self-efficacy for both patients and providers challenges the basic principles of shared decision making. The effects of shared decision making in psoriasis are inconclusive, and more research appears necessary to determine the possible benefits of shared decision-making interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hong J, Koo B, Koo J. The psychosocial and occupational impact of chronic skin disease. Dermatol Ther. 2008;21(1):54–9.
Belinchón I, Rivera R, Blanch C, Comellas M, Lizán L. Adherence, satisfaction and preferences for treatment in patients with psoriasis in the European Union: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:2357–67.
Machado-Pinto J, Diniz Mdos S, Bavoso NC. Psoriasis: new comorbidities. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91(1):8–14.
Rasmussen GS, Kragballe K, Maindal HT, Lomborg K. Experience of being young with psoriasis: self-management support needs. Qual Health Res. 2017;28(1):73–86.
Safdari R, Firoz A, Masoorian H. Identifying training and informational components to develop a psoriasis self- management application. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:67. https://doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.67.
Gionfriddo MR, Leppin AL, Brito JP, LeBlanc A, Boehmer KR, Morris MA, et al. A systematic review of shared decision making interventions in chronic conditions: a review protocol. Syst Rev. 2014;3:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-38.
Gionfriddo MR, Leppin AL, Brito JP, LeBlanc A, Shah ND, Montori VM. Shared decision-making and comparative effectiveness research for patients with chronic conditions: an urgent synergy for better health. J Comp Eff Res. 2013;2(6):595–603.
Friesen-Storms JHHM, Bours GJJW, van der Weijden T, Beurskens AJHM. Shared decision making in chronic care in the context of evidence based practice in nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):393–402.
Zoffmann V, Harder I, Kirkevold M. A person-centered communication and reflection model: sharing decision-making in chronic care. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(5):670–85.
Montori VM, Gafni A, Charles C. A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes. Health Expect. 2006;9(1):25–36.
Adams JR, Drake RE. Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice. Commun Ment Health J. 2006;42(1):87–105.
Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):114.
Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001431.
Coulter AC, Collins A. Making shared decision making a reality: no decision about me, without me. London: The King’s Fund; 2011. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/Making-shareddecision-making-a-reality-paper-Angela-Coulter-Alf-Collins-July-2011_0.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov 2017.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–43.
Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(1):47–53.
Soundy A, Roskell C, Elder T, Collett J, Dawes H. The psychological processes of adaptation and hope in patients with multiple sclerosis: a thematic synthesis. OJTR. 2016;4:22–47.
Rose A, Rosewilliam S, Soundy A. Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.030.
Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):45.
Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl. 1):6–20.
The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 19 Sept 2018.
Harden A, Thomas J. Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:257–271.
McDougall A, Edhlund B. Nvivo 11 essentials. 1st ed. 2016. http://Lulu.com. Accessed 5 Sep 2017.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J, Voils CI. Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(1):99–111.
Nelson PA, Barker Z, Griffiths CE, Cordingley L, Chew-Graham CA. ‘On the surface’: a qualitative study of GPs’ and patients’ perspectives on psoriasis. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:158.
Nelson PA, Chew-Graham CA, Griffiths CE, Cordingley L. Recognition of need in health care consultations: a qualitative study of people with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(2):354–61.
Tan J, Stacey D, Fung K, Barankin B, Bissonnette R, Gulliver W, et al. Treatment decision needs of psoriasis patients: cross-sectional survey. J Cutan Med Surg. 2010;14(5):233–9.
Renzi C, Di Pietro C, Tabolli S. Participation, satisfaction and knowledge level of patients with cutaneous psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011;36(8):885–8.
Radtke MA, Spehr C, Reich K, Rustenbach SJ, Feuerhahn J, Augustin M. Treatment satisfaction in psoriasis: development and use of the PsoSat Patient Questionnaire in a cross-sectional study. Dermatology. 2016;232(3):334–43.
Umar N, Schollgen I, Terris DD. It is not always about gains: utilities and disutilities associated with treatment features in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:187–94.
Tan J, Stacey D, Barankin B, Bissonnette R, Gulliver W, Lui H, et al. Support needed to involve psoriasis patients in treatment decisions: survey of dermatologists. J Cutan Med Surg. 2011;15(4):192–200.
Halioua B, Maury Le Breton A, de Fontaubert A, Roussel ME, Stalder JF. Treatment refusal among patients with psoriasis. J Dermatol Treat. 2015;26(5):396–400.
Tan J, Wolfe B. Improved decisional conflict and preparedness for decision making using a patient decision aid for treatment selection in psoriasis: a pilot study. J Cut Med Surg. 2014;18(2):114–8.
Gist DL, Bhushan R, Hamarstrom E, Sluka P, Presta CM, Thompson JS, et al. Impact of a performance improvement CME activity on the care and treatment of patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(3):516–23.
Blome C, Costanzo A, Dauden E, Ferrandiz C, Girolomoni G, Gniadecki R, et al. Patient-relevant needs and treatment goals in nail psoriasis. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(5):1179–88.
Gilet H, Roborel de Climens A, Arnould B, Bachelez H, Bagot M, Beaulieu P, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the REFlective evaLuation of psoriasis Efficacy of Treatment and Severity (REFLETS) questionnaire: a common measure of plaque-type psoriasis severity and treatment efficacy for patients and clinicians. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(3):498–506.
Linder D, Dalłolio E, Gisondi P, Berardesca E, Gennaro ED, Pennella AR, et al. Perception of disease and doctor-patient relationship experienced by patients with psoriasis: a questionnaire-based study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009;10(5):325–30.
Nelson PA, Kane K, Chisholm A, Pearce CJ, Keyworth C, Rutter MK, et al. ‘I should have taken that further’: missed opportunities during cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with psoriasis in UK primary care settings: a mixed-methods study. Health Expect. 2016;19(5):1121–37.
Umar N, Schaarschmidt M, Schmieder A, Peitsch WK, Schollgen I, Terris DD. Matching physicians’ treatment recommendations to patients’ treatment preferences is associated with improvement in treatment satisfaction. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(6):763–70.
Magin PJ, Adams J, Heading GS, Pond CD. Patients with skin disease and their relationships with their doctors: a qualitative study of patients with acne, psoriasis and eczema. Med J Aust. 2009;190(2):62–4.
Uhlenhake EE, Kurkowski D, Feldman SR. Conversations on psoriasis what patients want and what physicians can provide: a qualitative look at patient and physician expectations. J Dermatol Treat. 2010;21(1):6–12.
Reich K, Mrowietz U, Karakasili E, Zschocke I. Development of an adherence-enhancing intervention in topical treatment termed the topical treatment optimization program (TTOP). Arch Dermatol Res. 2014;306(7):667–76.
Khoury LR, Skov L, Møller T. Facing the dilemma of patient-centred psoriasis care: a qualitative study identifying patient needs in dermatological outpatient clinics. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(2):436–44.
Reich K, Zschocke I, Bachelez H, de Jong EMGJ, Gisondi P, Puig L, et al. A Topical Treatment Optimization Programme (TTOP) improves clinical outcome for calcipotriol/betamethasone gel in psoriasis: results of a 64-week multinational randomized phase IV study in 1790 patients (PSO-TOP). Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(1):197–205.
Balato N, Megna M, Di Costanzo L, Balato A, Ayala F. Educational and motivational support service: a pilot study for mobile-phone-based interventions in patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(1):201–5.
Lora V, Gisondi P, Calza A, Zanoni M, Girolomoni G. Efficacy of a single educative intervention in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Dermatology. 2009;219(4):316–21.
Renzi C, Di Pietro C, Gisondi P, Chinni LM, Fazio M, Ianni A, et al. Insufficient knowledge among psoriasis patients can represent a barrier to participation in decision-making. Acta Derm Venereol. 2006;86(6):528–34.
Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA. Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;70(4):351–79.
Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making: pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–1.
Eliacin J, Salyers MP, Kukla M, Matthias MS. Factors influencing patients’ preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care. J Ment Health. 2015;24(1):24–8.
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):291–309.
Peek ME, Wilson SC, Gorawara-Bhat R, Odoms-Young A, Quinn MT, Chin MH. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making among African–Americans with diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(10):1135–9.
Brundage MD, Feldman-Stewart D, Dixon P, Gregg R, Youssef Y, Davies D, et al. A treatment trade-off based decision aid for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Health Expect. 2000;3(1):55–68.
Walsh T, Barr PJ, Thompson R, Ozanne E, O’Neill C, Elwyn G. Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348:g188.
O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak. 1995;15(1):25–30.
Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.
Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(1):114–31.
Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(5):CD006732.
Légaré F, Politi MC, Drolet R, Desroches S, Stacey D, Bekker H. Training health professionals in shared decision-making: an international environmental scan. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88(2):159–69.
Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No sources of funding were received for the preparation of this article.
Conflict of interest
Marie Hamilton Larsen, Kåre Birger Hagen, Anne Lene Krogstad, and Astrid KlopstadWahl have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Larsen, M.H., Hagen, K.B., Krogstad, A.L. et al. Shared Decision Making in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol 20, 13–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-018-0390-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-018-0390-5