Teledermatology: A Review and Update
Telemedicine is slowly transforming the way in which healthcare is delivered and has the potential to improve access to subspecialty expertise, reduce healthcare costs, and improve the overall quality of care. While many subspecialty fields within medicine today have either experimented with or begun to implement telemedicine platforms to enable remote consultation and care, dermatology is particularly suited for this care system as skin disorders are uniquely visible to the human eye. Through teledermatology, diagnostic images of skin disorders with accompanying clinical histories can be remotely reviewed by teledermatologists by any number of modalities, such as photographic clinical images or live video teleconferencing. Diagnoses and treatment recommendations can then be rendered and implemented remotely. The evidence to date supports both its diagnostic and treatment accuracy and its cost effectiveness. Administrative, regulatory, privacy, and reimbursement policies surrounding this dynamic field continue to evolve. In this review, we examine the history, evidence, and administrative landscape surrounding teledermatology and discuss current practice guidelines and ongoing controversies.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
JJL and JCE have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.
No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript.
- 1.Porter DP, Porter R. Patient’s progress: doctors and doctoring in eighteenth-century England. Cambridge: Polity Press and Basil Blackwell; 1989.Google Scholar
- 2.Einthoven W. Le télécardiogramme. Archives Internationales de Physiologie. 1906;4(2):132–64.Google Scholar
- 3.Brown SG. A telephone relay. J Inst Electr Eng. 1910;45:590–601.Google Scholar
- 8.Rosenbaum BE, Campion CH, Cohen JM, Latkowski JA. The Department of Defense: pioneers of early teledermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2017;23(2).Google Scholar
- 12.The World Bank. Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people). 2015. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS.P2. Accessed 29 May 2017.
- 66.Thompson JN. Statement of the FSMB. Rogue online pharmacies: the growing problem of internet drug trafficking. Federation of State Medical Boards;2007. https://fsmb.org/Media/Default/PDF/FSMB/Advocacy/Internet_Testimony%20May%202007.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017.
- 67.US Teledermatology Survey 2012. American Telemedicine Association. http://www.americantelemed.org/main/membership/ata-members/ata-sigs/teledermatology-sig. Accessed 1 June 2017
- 69.Goldberg DJ. Teledermatology fraught with liability issues. 2014. http://dermatologytimes.modernmedicine.com/dermatology-times/content/tags/consultations/teledermatology-fraught-liability-issues?page=full. Accessed 8 June 2017.
- 70.American Academy of Dermatology. Position statement on teledermatology. https://www.aad.org/Forms/Policies/Uploads/PS/PS-Teledermatology.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017.
- 71.Scheinfeld N. Solving issues in teledermatology. Dermatologist. 2003;11(6). http://www.the-dermatologist.com/article/1807. Accessed 1 June 2017.
- 72.McKoy K. Practice guidelines for dermatology. American Telemedicine Association; 2016. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhigherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com%2FAMERICANTELEMED%2F3c09839afffd-46f7-916c-692c11d78933%2FUploadedImages%2FSIGs%2FTeledermatology.Final.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017.