Skip to main content
Log in

Oral Therapy for Onychomycosis: An Evidence-Based Review

  • Evidence-Based Review
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Onychomycosis is a very common fungal infection of the nail apparatus; however, it is very hard to treat, even when the causative agent is identified, and usually requires prolonged systemic antifungal therapy. Until the 1990s, oral treatment options included only griseofulvin and ketoconazole, and the cure rate was very low. New generations of antimycotics, such as fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine have improved treatment success.

Methods

Literature was identified by performing a PubMed Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, and Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) search. Prospective and randomized clinical trials were chosen to be included in this review. Forty-six trials were included.

Results

Fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine are effective in the treatment of onychomycosis and have a good safety profile. When a dermatophyte is the pathogen, terbinafine produces the best results. For Candida and nondermatophyte infections, the azoles, mainly itraconazole, are the recommended therapy.

Conclusion

In the majority of the studies, terbinafine treatment showed a higher cure ratio than the other drugs for dermatophyte onychomycosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta AK, Jain HC, Lynde CW, et al. Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients visiting physicians offices: a multicenter Canadian survey of 15,000 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(Pt 1):244–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta AK, Jain HC, Lynde CW, et al. Prevalence and epidemiology of unsuspected onychomycosis in patients visiting dermatologists’ offices in Ontario, Canada—a multicenter survey of 2001 patients. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:783–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gill D, Marks R. A review of the epidemiology of tinea unguium in the community. Australas J Dermatol. 1999;40:6–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scher RK, Coppa LM. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of onychomycosis. Hosp Med. 1998;34:11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elewski BE. Onychomycosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:415–29.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heikkilä H, Stubb S. The prevalence of onychomycosis in Finland. Br J Dermatol. 1995;133:699–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahdah M, Scher R. Onychomycosis—an overview. Mycoses. 2008;46(11–12):496–505.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elewski BE, Charif MA. Prevalence of onychomycosis in patients attending a dermatology clinic in northeastern Ohio for other conditions. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1172–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scher RK. Onychomycosis: a significant medical disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:S2–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finch JJ, Warshaw EM. Toenail onychomycosis: current and future treatment options. Dermatol Ther. 2007;20(1):31–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta AK, Sibbald RG, Lynde CW, et al. Onychomycosis in children: prevalence and treatment strategies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36:395–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Quality of life in toenail onychomycosis. In: Preedy VR, Watson RR, editors. Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 3837–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hay R. Literature review. Onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19(Suppl 1):1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shemer A. Update: medical treatment of onychomycosis. Dermatol Ther. 2012;25(6):582–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singal A, Khanna D. Onychomycosis: diagnosis and management. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(6):659–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lecha M, Effendy I, de Chauvin MF, et al. Treatment options—development of consensus guidelines. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19(suppl 1):25–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grover C, Khurana A. An update on treatment of onychomycosis. Mycoses. 2012;55(6):541–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elewski BE. Onychomycosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11(3):415–29.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans EG. Causative pathogens in onychomycosis and the possibility of treatment resistance: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(Pt 3):S32–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vender RB, Lynde CW, Poulin Y. Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis. J Cutan Med Surg. 2006;10(Suppl 2):S28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haneke E. Achilles foot-screening project: background, objectives and design. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1999;12(Suppl 1):S2–5 (discussion S17).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Abeck D, Haneke E, Hay R, Katsambas A, et al. High prevalence of foot diseases in Europe: results of the Achilles Project. Mycoses. 2003;46:496–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta AK, Fleckman P, Baran R. Ciclopirox nail lacquer topical solution 8% in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(Suppl 4):S70–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Balfour JA, Faulds D. Terbinafine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in superficial mycoses. Drags. 1992;43:259–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Evans EG, Sigurgeirsson B. Double blind, randomised study of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in treatment of toenail onychomycosis. The LION Study Group. Br J Dermatol. 1999;318:1031–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryder NS. Terbinafine: mode of action and properties of the squalene epoxidase inhibition. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(Suppl 39):2–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baudraz-Rosselet F, Rakosi T, Wili PB, et al. Treatment of onychomycosis with terbinafine. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(Suppl 39):40–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Finlay A. Pharmacokinetics of terbinafine in the nail. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(Suppl. 39):28–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goodfield MJ. Short-duration therapy with terbinafine for dermatophyte onychomycosis: a multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(Suppl 39):33–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Watson A, Marley J, Ellis D, Williams T. Terbinafine in onychomycosis of the toenail: a novel treatment protocol. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(5 Pt 1):775–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alpsoy E, Yilmaz E, Basaran E. Intermittent therapy with terbinafine for dermatophyte toe-onychomycosis: a new approach. J Dermatol. 1996;23:259–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Drake LA, Shear NH, Arlette JP, et al. Oral terbinafine in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis: North American multicenter trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(5 Pt 1):740–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Billstein S, Kianifard F, Justice A. Terbinafine vs. placebo for onychomycosis in black patients. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38(5):377–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Farkas B, Paul C, Dobozy A, et al. Terbinafine (Lamisil) treatment of toenail onychomycosis in patients with insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(2):254–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Warshaw EM, Fett DD, Bloomfield HE, et al. Pulse versus continuous terbinafine for onychomycosis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(4):578–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Takahata Y, Hiruma M, Shiraki Y, et al. Treatment of dermatophyte onychomycosis with three pulses of terbinafine (500 mg day for a week). Mycoses. 2009;52(1):72–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Assaf RR, Elewski BE. Intermittent fluconazole dosing in patients with onychomycosis: results of a pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35(2 Pt 1):216–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Scher RK, Breneman D, Rich P, et al. Once-weekly fluconazole (150, 300, or 450 mg) in the treatment of distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(6 Pt 2):77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ling MR, Swinyer LJ, Jarratt MT, et al. Once-weekly fluconazole (450 mg) for 4, 6, or 9 months of treatment for distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(6 Pt 2):95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Drake L, Babel D, Stewart DM, et al. Once-weekly fluconazole (150, 300, or 450 mg) in the treatment of distal subungual onychomycosis of the fingernail. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(6 Pt 2):87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Savin RC, Drake L, Babel D, et al. Pharmacokinetics of three once-weekly dosages of fluconazole (150, 300, or 450 mg) in distal subungual onychomycosis of the fingernail. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:110–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chen X, Hiruma M, Shiraki Y, et al. Combination therapy of once-weekly fluconazole (100, 150, or 300 mg) with topical application of ketoconazole cream in the treatment of onychomycosis. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2004;57(6):260–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Odom R, Daniel CR, Aly R. A double-blind, randomized comparison of itraconazole capsules and placebo in the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35(1):110–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Odom RB, Aly R, Scher RK, et al. A multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of intermittent therapy with itraconazole for the treatment of onychomycosis of the fingernail. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36(2 Pt 1):231–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. De Doncker PR, Scher RK, Baran RL, et al. Itraconazole therapy is effective for pedal onychomycosis caused by some nondermatophyte molds and in mixed infection with dermatophytes and molds: a multicenter study with 36 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36(2 Pt 1):173–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen J, Liao W, Wen H, et al. A comparison among four regimens of itraconazole treatment in onychomycosis. Mycoses. 1999;42(1–2):93–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hiruma M, Matsushita A, Kobayashi M, et al. One week pulse therapy with itraconazole (200 mg day−1) for onychomycosis. Evaluation of treatment results according to patient background. Mycoses. 2001;44(3–4):87–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gupta AK, De Doncker P, Haneke E. Itraconazole pulse therapy for the treatment of Candida onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001;15(2):112–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Avner S, Nir N, Baruch K, et al. Two novel itraconazole pulse therapies for onychomycosis: a 2-year follow-up. J Dermatol Treat. 2006;17(2):117–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Havu V, Heikkilä H, Kuokkanen K, et al. A double-blind, randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of terbinafine (Lamisil) with fluconazole (Diflucan) in the treatment of onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(1):97–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Arca E, Taştan HB, Akar A, et al. An open, randomized, comparative study of oral fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine therapy in onychomycosis. J Dermatol Treat. 2002;13(1):3–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bräutigam M, Nolting S, Schopf RE, et al. Randomised double blind comparison of terbinafine and itraconazole for treatment of toenail tinea infection. Seventh Lamisil German Onychomycosis Study Group. BMJ. 1995;311(7010):919–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Stinchi C, et al. Terbinafine therapy with continuous terbinafine treatment and intermittent itraconazole therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34(4):595–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. De Backer M, De Vroey C, Lesaffre E, Scheys I, De Keyser P. Twelve weeks of continuous oral therapy for toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes: a double-blind comparative trial of terbinafine 250 mg/day versus itraconazole 200 mg/day. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(5 Pt 3):S57–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sigurgeirsson B, Billstein S, Rantanen T, et al. L.I.ON. Study: efficacy and tolerability of continuous terbinafine (Lamisil) compared to intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Lamisil vs. itraconazole in onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(Suppl 56):5–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bahadir S, Inalöz HS, Alpay K, et al. Continuous terbinafine or pulse itraconazole: a comparative study on onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(5):422–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gupta AK, Konnikov N, Lynde CW. Sequential pulse therapy with itraconazole and terbinafine to treat onychomycosis of the fingernails. J Dermatol Treat. 2000;11:151–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gupta AK, Lynde CW, Konnikov N. Single-blind, randomized, prospective study of sequential itraconazole and terbinafine pulse compared with terbinafine pulse for the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44(3):485–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Heikkilä H, Stubb S. Long-term results in patients with onychomycosis treated with terbinafine or itraconazole. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(2):250–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sigurgeirsson B, Olafsson JH, Steinsson JB, et al. Long-term effectiveness of treatment with terbinafine vs itraconazole in onychomycosis: a 5-year blinded prospective follow-up study. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:353–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Warshaw EM, Nelson D, Carver SM, et al. A pilot evaluation of pulse itraconazole vs. terbinafine for treatment of Candida toenail onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44(9):785–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mishra M, Panda P, Tripathy S, et al. An open randomized comparative study of oral itraconazole pulse and terbinafine pulse in the treatment of onychomycosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2005;71(4):262–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gupta AK, Gover MD, Lynde CW. Pulse itraconazole vs. continuous terbinafine for the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(10):1188–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gupta AK, Lynch LE, Kogan N, et al. The use of an intermittent terbinafine regimen for the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(3):256–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Piraccini B, Sisti A, Tosti A. Long-term follow-up of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes after successful treatment with systemic antifungal agents. Dermatology. 2010;62:411–4.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Krishna G, Beresford E, Ma L, et al. Skin concentrations and pharmacokinetics of posaconazole after oral administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(5):1807–10.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Elewski B, Pollak R, Ashton S, et al. A randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, investigator-blinded study of four treatment regimens of posaconazole in adults with toenail onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(2):389–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Haneke E, Tausch I, Bräutigam M, et al. Short-duration treatment of fingernail dermatophytosis: a randomized, double-blind study with terbinafine and griseofulvin. LAGOS III Study Group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32(1):72–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Faergemann J, Anderson C, Hersle K, et al. Double-blind, parallel-group comparison of terbinafine and griseofulvin in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32(5 Pt 1):750–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hofmann H, Bräutigam M, Weidinger G, et al. Treatment of toenail onychomycosis. A randomized, double-blind study with terbinafine and griseofulvin. LAGOS II Study Group. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(8):919–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Piepponen T, Blomqvist K, Brandt H, et al. Efficacy and safety of itraconazole in the long-term treatment of onychomycosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;29(2):195–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Korting HC, Schäfer-Korting M, Zienicke H, et al. Treatment of tinea unguium with medium and high doses of ultramicrosize griseofulvin compared with that with itraconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37(10):2064–8.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gupta AK, Gregurek-Novak T. Efficacy of itraconazole, terbinafine, fluconazole, griseofulvin and ketoconazole in the treatment of Scopulariopsis brevicaulis causing onychomycosis of the toes. Dermatology. 2001;202:235–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hall M, Monka C, Krupp P, et al. Safety of oral terbinafine: results of a postmarketing surveillance study in 25,884 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1213–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gupta AK, Chwetzoff E, Del Rosso F, et al. Hepatic safety of itraconazole. J Cutan Med Surg. 2002;6:210–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Castellsague AD, Perez-Gutthann S, et al. A cohort study on the risk of acute liver injury among users of ketoconazole and other antifungal drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;48:847–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Castellsague J, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Duque A, et al. Risk of serious skin disorders among users of oral antifungals: a population-based study. BMC Dermatol. 2002;2:14.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Gupta AK, Shear NH. A risk-benefit assessment of the newer oral antifungal agents used to treat onychomycosis. Drug Saf. 2000;22:33–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Del Rosso JQ, Gupta AK, Conte ET. How to recognize and manage adverse reactions to oral antifungals. Skin Aging. 1999;42:48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hall M, Monka C, Krupp R, et al. Safety of oral terbinafine: results of a postmarketing surveillance study in 25, 884 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1213–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. O’Sullivan DP, Needham CA, Bangs A, et al. Postmarketing surveillance of oral terbinafine in the UK: report of a large cohort study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;42:559–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gupta AK, Sauder DN, Shear NH. Antifungal agents: an overview, part II. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;30:911–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Elewski BE. Clinical pearl: diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32:500–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Epstein WL, Shah VP, Riegelman S. Griseofulvin levels in the stratum corneum: study after oral administration in man. Arch Dermatol. 1972;106:344–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Wenig JA. The systemic treatment of onychomycosis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004;21:579–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Meinhof W. Kinetics and spectrum of activity of oral antifungals: the therapeutic implications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29(1):S39.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Chien RN, Yang LJ, Lin PY, et al. Hepatic injury during ketoconazole therapy in patients with onychomycosis: a controlled cohort study. Hepatology. 1997;25(1):103–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Knight T, Shokuma C, Knight J. Ketoconazole-induced fulminant hepatitis necessitating liver transplantation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25:398–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Janssen PAJ, Cauwenbergh G, Symoens J. Hepatic reactions during ketoconazole treatment: a 1-year update. Beerse: Janssen Pharmaceutica; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Huang PH, Paller AS. Itraconazole pulse therapy for dermatophyte onychomycosis in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(6):614–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kim TH, Kim BH, Kim YW, et al. Liver cirrhosis developed after ketoconazole-induced acute hepatic injury. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18(12):1426–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Stricker BH, Block APR, Bronkhorst FB, et al. Ketoconazole associated hepatic injury. J Hepatol. 1986;3:399–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Hay RJ. Risk/benefit ratio of modern antifungal therapy: focus on hepatic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29(1 Suppl):S50–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Kuokkanen K, Alava S. Fluconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes. J Dermatol Treat. 1993;3:115–7.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Smith SW, Sealy DP, Schneider E, et al. An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of fluconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis. South Med J. 1995;88:1217–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. De Doncker P, Decroix J, Pierard GE, et al. Antifungal pulse therapy for onychomycosis: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of monthly cycles of 1-week pulse therapy with itraconazole. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:34–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Alcantara R, Garibay JM. Itraconazole therapy in dermatomycoses and vaginal candidiasis: effects and adverse effects profile in a large multi-center study. Adv Ther. 1988;5(6):326–34.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Suhonen R, Neuvonen PJ. The tolerability profile of terbinafine. Rev Contemp Pharmacother. 1997;8:373–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Tavakkol A, Fellman S, Kianifard F. Safety and efficacy of oral terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis: analysis of the elderly subgroup in Improving Results in Onychomycosis-Concomitant Lamisil and Debridement (IRON-CLAD), an open-label, randomized trial. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006;4(1):1–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Hall M, Monka C, Krupp R, et al. Safety of oral terbinafine: results of a postmarketing surveillance study in 25, 884 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1213–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. O’Sullivan DP, Needham CA, Bangs A, et al. Postmarketing surveillance of oral terbinafine in the UK: report of a large cohort study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;42:559–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Stricker BHC, Van Riemsdijk MM, Stunkenboom MCJM, et al. Taste loss to terbinafine: a case–control study of potential risk factors [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1995;4:522.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Chambers WM, Millar A, Jain S, et al. Terbinafine induced hepatic dysfunction. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13:1115–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Arikian SR, Einarson TR, Kobelt-Nguyen G, et al. A multinational pharmacoeconomic analysis of oral therapies for onychomycosis. The Onychomycosis Study Group. Br J Dermatol. 1994;130(Suppl 43):32–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Marchetti A, Piech CT, McGhan WF, et al. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of oral therapies for onychomycosis: a U.S. model. Clin Ther. 1996;18:757–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Einarson TR, Arikian SR, Shear NH. Cost-effectiveness analysis for onychomycosis therapy in Canada from a government perspective. Br J Dermatol. 1994;130(Suppl 43):35–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Warshaw EM. Evaluating costs for onychomycosis treatments: a practitioner’s perspective. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006;96:38–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to prepare this article. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella Tosti.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 77 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Sá, D.C., Lamas, A.P.B. & Tosti, A. Oral Therapy for Onychomycosis: An Evidence-Based Review. Am J Clin Dermatol 15, 17–36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-013-0056-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-013-0056-2

Keywords

Navigation