Advertisement

Synthesis, characterization and evaluations of TiO2 nanostructures prepared from different titania precursors for photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol in aqueous solution

  • Amir Payan
  • Moslem Fattahi
  • Behrooz Roozbehani
Research Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The aim of present work, was to synthesize the titanium nanoparticles (TNPs) and titanium nanotubes (TNTs) through the hydrothermal method with different precursors including the Titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP) and Titanium(IV) bis(ammonium lactato)dihydroxide (TALH).

Methods

TiO2 nanostructures from different titania precursors as heterogeneous photocatalysis via hydrothermal method were synthesized. The as-prepared photocatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectra, surface area measurements, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy. The TiO2 photocatalysts were tested on the degradation of 4-Chlorophenol (4-CP) aqueous solution under UVC irradiation in a fabricated photoreactor.

Results

The effect of operating parameters including the; initial 4-CP concentration (50–150 mg/L), catalyst dosages (0–3 g/L) and solution pH (4–10) on the photocatalytic activity of the prepared catalysts were systematically investigated. The results show that amongst the TiO2 nanostructures under best conditions (initial 4-CP concentration of 50 mg/L, catalyst dosage of 2 g/L, pH of 4.0, Time of 180 min) TNT-P2 exhibited much higher photocatalytic degradation efficiency (82%) as compared with TNT-P1 (77%), TNP-P2 (51%), and TNP-P1 (48%). Moreover, the mechanism and tentative pathways of 4-CP degradation were explored. Finally, the kinetic study was performed and the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model was aptly fitted with the experimental data.

Conclusion

The results of the photocatalytic activity measurement demonstrated that one-dimensional TNTs shows enhanced photocatalytic performance as compared to the TNPs, therefore, indicating the beneficial feature of TNTs as a photocatalyst for the degradation of pollutants. Besides, TiO2 nanostructures prepared from TALH precursor (TNT-P2 82%, TNP-P2 51%) has higher photocatalytic degradation efficiency as compared with TTIP precursors (TNT-P1 77%, TNP-P1 48%).

Keywords

Titanium nanostructures Photocatalytic UV irradiation Hydrothermal method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Abadan Faculty of Petroleum University, Abadan, Iran. The authors thank the PUT for the financial support.

Authors’ contributions

MF conceived the project. AP wrote the initial drafts of the work. AP designed the experiments, synthesized and characterized the materials. AP, MF, and BR analyzed the data. All authors discussed the results of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research has been supported financially by Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Abadan Faculty of Petroleum University, Abadan, Iran.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable”.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

“Not applicable”.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang W, Wang C-B, Lien H-L. Treatment of chlorinated organic contaminants with nanoscale bimetallic particles. Catal Today. 1998;40:387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nguyen AT, Juang R-S. Photocatalytic degradation of p-chlorophenol by hybrid H2O2 and TiO2 in aqueous suspensions under UV irradiation. J Environ Manag. 2015;147:271–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahmiani Y, Sevim AM, Gül A. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol under visible light by using TiO2 catalysts impregnated with co(II) and Zn(II) phthalocyanine derivatives. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2016;321:24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashemzadeh F, Gaffarinejad A, Rahimi R. Porous p-NiO/n-Nb2O5 nanocomposites prepared by an EISA route with enhanced photocatalytic activity in simultaneous Cr (VI) reduction and methyl orange decolorization under visible light irradiation. J Hazard Mater. 2015;286:64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazloomi Tabaei HS, Kazemeini M, Fattahi M. Preparation and characterization of visible light sensitive nano titanium dioxide photocatalyst. Sci Iran. 2012;19:1626–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas J, Radhika S, Yoon M. Nd3+ doped TiO2 nanoparticles incorporated with heteropoly phosphotungstic acid: a novel solar photocatalyst for degradation of 4-chlorophenol in water. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2016;411:146–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li F, Dai Y, Gong M, Yu T, Chen X. Synthesis, characterization of magnetic-sepiolite supported with TiO2, and the photocatalytic performance over Cr (VI) and 2, 4-dichlorophenol co-existed wastewater. J Alloys Compd. 2015;638:435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barros WRP, Ereno T, Tavares AC, Lanza MRV. In situ electrochemical generation of hydrogen peroxide in alkaline aqueous solution by using an unmodified gas diffusion electrode. ChemElectroChem. 2015;2:714–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan L, Huang Y, Cui J, Jing C. Simultaneous as(III) and cd removal from copper smelting wastewater using granular TiO2 columns. Water Res. 2015;68:572–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang JC, Ren J, Yao HC, Zhang L, Wang JS, Zang SQ, et al. Synergistic photocatalysis of Cr(VI) reduction and 4-Chlorophenol degradation over hydroxylated Fe2O3 under visible light irradiation. J Hazard Mater. 2016;311:11–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang M, Fang G, Liu P, Zhou D, Ma C, Zhang D, et al. Fe3O4@β-CD nanocomposite as heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst for enhanced degradation of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP). Appl Catal B Environ. 2016;188:113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Q, Jiang H, Zang S, Li J, Wang Q. Gd, C, N and P quaternary doped anatase-TiO2 nano-photocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol under simulated sunlight irradiation. J Alloys Compd. 2014;586:411–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li S, Xu Y, Wang X, Guo Y, Mu Q. Catalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol with La/TiO2 in a dielectric barrier discharge system. RSC Adv. 2016;6:28994–9002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu Z, Liu F, Zhang H, Zhang J, Han L. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol over ag/MFe2O4 (M = co, Zn, cu, and Ni) prepared by a modified chemical co-precipitation method: a comparative study. RSC Adv. 2015;5:55499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pozan GS, Kambur A. Significant enhancement of photocatalytic activity over bifunctional ZnO–TiO2 catalysts for 4-chlorophenol degradation. Chemosphere. 2014;105:152–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zouzelka R, Kusumawati Y, Remzova M, Rathousky J, Pauporté T. Photocatalytic activity of porous multiwalled carbon nanotube-TiO2 composite layers for pollutant degradation. J Hazard Mater. 2016;317:52–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhai Q, Zhang L, Zhao X, Chen H, Yin D, Li J, et al. A novel iron-containing polyoxometalate heterogeneous photocatalyst for efficient 4-chlorophennol degradation by H2O2 at neutral pH. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;377:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naeem K, Ouyang F. Influence of supports on photocatalytic degradation of phenol and 4-chlorophenol in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide. J Environ Sci. 2013;25:399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Di J, Chen J, Ji M, Zhang Q, Xu L, Xia J. Reactable ionic liquid induced homogeneous carbon superdoping of BiPO4 for superior photocatalytic removal of 4-chlorophenol. Chem Eng J. 2016;313:1477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wong CL, Tan YN, Mohamed AR. A review on the formation of titania nanotube photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment. J Environ Manag. 2011;92:1669–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen X, Mao SS. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev. 2007;107:2891–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu N, Chen X, Zhang J, Schwank JW. A review on TiO2-based nanotubes synthesized via hydrothermal method: formation mechanism, structure modification, and photocatalytic applications. Catal Today. 2014;225:34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang Y, Jiang Z, Huang J, Lim LY, Li W, Deng J. Titanate and titania nanostructured materials for environmental and energy applications: a review. RSC Adv. 2015;5:79479–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cargnello M, Gordon TR, Murray CB. Solution-phase synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and nanocrystals. Chem Rev. 2014;114:9319–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miranda-Sánchez J, Elizalde I, Lartundo-Rojas L, Hernández-Pérez I, Jaramillo-Vigueras D, Ramírez-López R. The effect of titania precursors and ceria loadings on textural and chemical properties of TiO2–CeO2 and Pt–Rh/TiO2–CeO2. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2015;74:707–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Behzadnia A, Montazer M, Rashidi A, Rad MM. Sonosynthesis of nano TiO2 on wool using titanium isopropoxide or butoxide in acidic media producing multifunctional fabric. Ultrason Sonochem. 2014;21:1815–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berki P, Reti B, Terzi K, Bountas I, Horvath E, Fejes D, et al. The effect of titania precursor on the morphology of prepared TiO2/MWCNT nanocomposite materials. Phys Status Solidi. 2014;251:2384–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chae SY, Park MK, Lee SK, Kim TY, Kim SK, Lee WI. Preparation of size-controlled TiO2 nanoparticles and derivation of optically transparent photocatalytic films. Chem Mater. 2003;15:3326–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tang Z-RR, Li F, Zhang Y, Fu X, Xu Y-JJ. Composites of titanate nanotube and carbon nanotube as photocatalyst with high mineralization ratio for gas-phase degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:7880–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kandiel TA, Feldhoff A, Robben L, Dillert R, Bahnemann DW. Tailored titanium dioxide nanomaterials: anatase nanoparticles and brookite nanorods as highly active photocatalysts. Chem Mater. 2010;22:2050–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mohammadzadeh S, Olya ME, Arabi AM, Shariati A, Khosravi Nikou MR. Synthesis, characterization and application of ZnO-ag as a nanophotocatalyst for organic compounds degradation, mechanism and economic study. J Environ Sci. 2015;35:194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xiong L, Yang Y, Mai J, Sun W, Zhang C, Wei D. Adsorption behavior of methylene blue onto titanate nanotubes. Chem Eng J. 2010;156:313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pasandideh EK, Kakavandi B, Nasseri S, Mahvi AH, Nabizadeh R, Esrafili A, et al. Silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles core-shell spheres (Fe3O4@SiO2) for natural organic matter removal. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2016;14:21.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zeng Y, Wang X, Wang H, Dong Y, Ma Y, Yao J. Multi-shelled titania hollow spheres fabricated by a hard template strategy: enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem Commun. 2010;46:4312–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lin H, Huang C, Li W, Ni C, Shah S, Tseng Y. Size dependency of nanocrystalline TiO2 on its optical property and photocatalytic reactivity exemplified by 2-chlorophenol. Appl Catal B Environ. 2006;68:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Madhusudan Reddy K, Gopal Reddy CV, Manorama SV. Preparation, characterization, and spectral studies on Nanocrystalline Anatase TiO2. J Solid State Chem. 2001;158:180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Choudhury B, Bayan S, Choudhury A, Chakraborty P. Narrowing of band gap and effective charge carrier separation in oxygen deficient TiO2 nanotubes with improved visible light photocatalytic activity. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;465:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu Z, Zhang Q, Qin L-C. Reduction in the electronic band gap of titanium oxide nanotubes. Solid State Commun. 2007;141:168–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu W, Zhao X, Borthwick AGL, Wang Y, Ni J. Dual-enhanced photocatalytic activity of Fe-deposited titanate nanotubes used for simultaneous removal of as (III) and as (V). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:19726–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xiong L, Chen C, Chen Q, Ni J. Adsorption of Pb (II) and cd (II) from aqueous solutions using titanate nanotubes prepared via hydrothermal method. J Hazard Mater. 2011;189:741–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    El-Sheikh SM, Khedr TM, Zhang G, Vogiazi V, Ismail AA, Shea KO. Tailored synthesis of anatase–brookite heterojunction photocatalysts for degradation of cylindrospermopsin under UV–vis light. Chem Eng J. 2016;310:428–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ahmadi M, Ramezani H, Jaafarzadeh N, Motlagh HR, Jaafarzadeh N, Mostoufi A, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline and real pharmaceutical wastewater using MWCNT/TiO2 nano-composite. J Environ Manag. 2017;186:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hsieh C-TT, Fan W-SS, Chen W-YY, Lin J-YY. Adsorption and visible-light-derived photocatalytic kinetics of organic dye on co-doped titania nanotubes prepared by hydrothermal synthesis. Sep Purif Technol. 2009;67:312–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang N, Li X, Wang Y, Quan X, Chen G. Evaluation of bias potential enhanced photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol with TiO2 nanotube fabricated by anodic oxidation method. Chem Eng J. 2009;146:30–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fabbri D, Prevot A, Pramauro E. Effect of surfactant microstructures on photocatalytic degradation of phenol and chlorophenols. Appl Catal B Environ. 2006;62:21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shojaie A, Fattahi M, Jorfi S, Ghasemi B. Hydrothermal synthesis of Fe-TiO2-ag nano-sphere for photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP): investigating the effect of hydrothermal temperature and time as well as calcination temperature. J Environ Chem Eng. 2017;5:4564–72.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chiou C-H, Wu C-Y, Juang R-S. Photocatalytic degradation of phenol and m-nitrophenol using irradiated TiO2 in aqueous solutions. Sep Purif Technol. 2008;62:559–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jiang T, Zhang L, Ji M, Wang Q, Zhao Q, Fu X. Carbon nanotubes/TiO2 nanotubes composite photocatalysts for efficient degradation of methyl orange dye. Particuology. 2013;11:737–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gholami M, Nassehinia HR, Jonidi-Jafari A, Nasseri S, Esrafili A. Comparison of Benzene & Toluene removal from synthetic polluted air with use of Nano photocatalyticTiO2/ZNO process. J Environ Heal Sci Eng. 2014;12:45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chowdhury P, Moreira J, Gomaa H, Ray AK. Visible-solar-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of phenol with dye-sensitized TiO2: parametric and kinetic study. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:4523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    González-Juárez JC, Jiménez-Becerril J, Carrasco-Ábrego H. Influence of pH on the degradation 4-chlorophenol by gamma radiocatalysis using SiO2, Al2O3 and TiO2. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2008;275:257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Venkatachalam N, Palanichamy M, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol by Zr4+ doped nano TiO2. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2007;266:158–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kim S, Choi W. Visible-light-induced photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol and phenolic compounds in aqueous suspension of pure titania: demonstrating the existence of a surface-complex-mediated path. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:5143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ai Z, Yang P, Lu X. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol by a microwave assisted photocatalysis method. J Hazard Mater. 2005;124:147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Poorkarimi A, Karimi-Jashni A, Javadpour S. Optimization of toluene removal over W-doped TiO2 nano-photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. Environ Technol. 2017;1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1375021.
  56. 56.
    Zhao C, Pelaez M, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC, Byrne JA, O’Shea KE. {UV} and visible light activated TiO2 photocatalysis of 6-hydroxymethyl uracil, a model compound for the potent cyanotoxin cylindrospermopsin. Catal Today. 2014;224:70–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Li X, Cubbage JW, Tetzlaff TA, Jenks WS. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol. 1. The hydroquinone pathway. J Org Chem. 1999;64:8509–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Li X, Cubbage JW, Jenks WS. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol. 2. The 4-chlorocatechol pathway. J Org Chem. 1999;64:8525–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Payan A, Fattahi M, Jorfi S, Roozbehani B, Payan S. Synthesis and characterization of titanate nanotube/single-walled carbon nanotube (TNT/SWCNT) porous nanocomposite and its photocatalytic activity on 4-Chlorophenol degradation under UV and solar irradiation. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;434:336–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Alimoradzadeh R, Assadi A, Nasseri S, Mehrasbi MR. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol by UV/H2O2/NiO process in aqueous solution. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2012;9:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Payan
    • 1
  • Moslem Fattahi
    • 1
  • Behrooz Roozbehani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Abadan Faculty of Petroleum EngineeringPetroleum University of TechnologyAbadanIran

Personalised recommendations