Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study of predicting hospital solid waste generation using multiple linear regression and artificial intelligence

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A successful hospital solid waste (HSW) management needs an accurate estimation of waste generation rates. The conventional regression methods upon increasing the number of input variables hardly can predict the HSW generation rate and require more complex modeling. In return, application of machine learning methods seems to be able to increase the power of predicting the produced wastes.

Methods

To predict the HSW, Multiple Linear Regression(MLR) and several Neuron- and Kernel-based machine learning methods were employed to analyze data from hospitals of Karaj metropolis. The number of wards, active and occupied beds, staffs and inpatients, and ownership type and activity years of hospital were defined as the model inputs. In addition, proposed models performance was evaluated based on coefficient of determination (R2) and Mean-Square Error (MSE).

Results

The performance of Neuron- and Kernel-based machine learning methods indicated that both models were satisfactory in predicting HSW. However, the better results of 0.82–0.86 for average R2 value and 0.003–0.008 for average MSE value, indicated relative superiority of Kernel-based models compared to Neuron based (average R2 = 0.68–0.74, average MSE = 0.009–0.023) and MLR models. Number of staffs and hospital ownership type were the most influential model variables in predicting the HSW generation rate.

Conclusions

The machine learning methods could interpret the relationship between waste generation rate and model inputs, appropriately. Thus, they may play an effective role in developing cost-effective methods for suitable HSW management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sabour MR, Mohamedifard A, Kamalan H. A mathematical model to predict the composition and generation of hospital wastes in Iran. Waste Manag. 2007;27(4):584–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dastpak H, Golbaz S, Farzadkia M, editors. Hospital waste minimisation, separation, treatment and disposal in Iran: a mini review study. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management; 2017: Thomas Telford Ltd.

  3. Matsuto T, Tanaka N. Data analysis of daily collection tonnage of residential solid waste in Japan. Waste Manag Res. 1993;11(4):333–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sengupta D, Agrahari S. Modelling trends in solid and hazardous waste management: Springer; 2017.

  5. Abbasi M, Abduli M, Omidvar B, Baghvand A. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation by hybrid support vector machine and partial least square model. International Journal of Environmental Research. 2012;7(1):27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tiwari MK, Bajpai S, Dewangan U. Prediction of industrial solid waste with ANFIS model and its comparison with ANN model-a case study of Durg-Bhilai twin city India. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT). 2012;6(2):192–201.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wieland D, Wotawa F, Wotawa G. From neural networks to qualitative models in environmental engineering. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2002;17(2):104–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbasi M, El Hanandeh A. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches. Waste management (New York, NY). 2016;56:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali Abdoli M, Falah Nezhad M, Salehi Sede R, Behboudian S. Longterm forecasting of solid waste generation by the artificial neural networks. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2012;31(4):628–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Noori R, Abdoli M, Ghasrodashti AA, Jalili Ghazizade M. Prediction of municipal solid waste generation with combination of support vector machine and principal component analysis: a case study of Mashhad. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2009;28(2):249–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Farzadkia M, Emamjomeh M, Golbaz S, Sajadi H. An investigation on hospital solid waste management in Iran. Glob NEST J. 2015;17:771–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Da Silva C, Hoppe A, Ravanello M, Mello N. Medical wastes management in the south of Brazil. Waste Manag. 2005;25(6):600–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bdour A, Altrabsheh B, Hadadin N, Al-Shareif M. Assessment of medical wastes management practice: a case study of the northern part of Jordan. Waste Manag. 2007;27(6):746–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Komilis D, Katsafaros N. Statistical predictors of hazardous medical waste generation rates in a 40-bed general hospital. Global NEST Journal. 2011;13(2):170–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Awad A, Obeidat M, Al-Shareef M. Mathematical-statistical models of generated hazardous hospital solid waste. J Environ Sci Health A. 2004;39(2):315–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tesfahun E, Kumie A, Beyene A. Developing models for the prediction of hospital healthcare waste generation rate. Waste Manag Res. 2016;34(1):75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods: Cambridge university press; 2000.

  18. Carbonell JG, Michalski RS, Mitchell TM. An overview of machine learning. In: Machine learning: Springer; 1983. p. 3–23.

  19. Dreiseitl S, Ohno-Machado L. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform. 2002;35(5):352–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang S-C. Artificial neural network. In: Interdisciplinary computing in java programming: Springer; 2003. p. 81–100.

  21. Zhang G, Patuwo BE, Hu MY. Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int J Forecast. 1998;14(1):35–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jang J-S. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. 1993;23(3):665–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang J-S, editor. Input selection for ANFIS learning. Fuzzy Systems, 1996., Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on; 1996: IEEE.

  24. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20(3):273–97.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization. and beyond MIT press. 2002.

  26. Suykens JA, Vandewalle J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett. 1999;9(3):293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong DH, Hwang C. Support vector fuzzy regression machines. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2003;138(2):271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Akter N, Hussain Z, Trankler J, Parkpian P. Hospital waste management and it's probable health effect: a lesson learned from Bangladesh. Indian journal of environmental health. 2002;44(2):124–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Raygan Shirazi A, Mari Oryad H, Malekzadeh J. Solid wastes management of Yasuj hospitals, Iran 2006. Armaghane danesh. 2008;13(1):105–13.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sawalem M, Selic E, Herbell J-D. Hospital waste management in Libya: a case study. Waste Manag. 2009;29(4):1370–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jahandideh S, Jahandideh S, Asadabadi EB, Askarian M, Movahedi MM, Hosseini S, et al. The use of artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression to predict rate of medical waste generation. Waste Manag. 2009;29(11):2874–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Tehran University of Medical Sciences (number 95-04-61-33434), Department of Environmental Health Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramin Nabizadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 199 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golbaz, S., Nabizadeh, R. & Sajadi, H.S. Comparative study of predicting hospital solid waste generation using multiple linear regression and artificial intelligence. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 17, 41–51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-018-00324-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-018-00324-z

Keywords

Navigation