Advertisement

The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of the use of enoxaparin compared with heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical inpatients in Iran

  • Mohammadreza AmirsadriEmail author
  • Sarah Mousavi
  • Ali Karimipour
Research article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Moderate to high risk medical inpatients are at increased risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). The present study aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of using Enoxaparin compared to Heparin in VTE prophylaxis in medical inpatients, from Iranian payer’s perspective.

Methods

Decision tree modeling technique was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the compared interventions. The main considered outcomes were Life Years Gained (LYG) for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) for Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA). Costs and consequences of the interventions were evaluated for a three-month period and reported as Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs). One-way and Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model due to uncertainty in the input data.

Results

In base case scenario (i.e. public tariff), incremental cost was $10.32, and incremental QALY and incremental LYG were 0.0001 and 0.0002 per patients respectively. Base case ICERs were 60,376 USD/QALY and 71,077 USD/LYG per patient. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of the model.

Conclusion

As the estimated ICER per QALY is more than three times the reported Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita by world bank for Iran in 2017 ($5415), the use of Enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in medical in patients doesn’t seem to be a cost-effective intervention compared to the use of Heparin in Iran.

Keywords

Economic evaluation Enoxaparin Heparin Venous thromboembolism Medical inpatients 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Tagalakis V, Patenaude V, Kahn SR, Suissa S. Incidence of and mortality from venous thromboembolism in a real-world population: the Q-VTE study cohort. Am J Med. 2013;126(9):832. e13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blann A. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a guide for practitioners: M&K Update Ltd. Cumbria. 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Goldhaber SZ. Handbook for Venous Thromboembolism: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23_suppl_1):I-9–I-16.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laryea J, Champagne B. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26(03):153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mackman N. New insights into the mechanisms of venous thrombosis. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(7):2331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharif-Kashani B, Mohebi-Nejad A, Abooturabi S-M. Estimated prevalence of venous thromboembolism in Iran: prophylaxis still an unmet challenge. Tanaffos. 2015;14(1):27–33.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caprini JA. Risk assessment as a guide for the prevention of the many faces of venous thromboembolism. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):S3–S10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wells G, Kelly S, Elliot J, Carrier M, Geerts W, Lee AYY, et al. Low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolic in medical and non-orthopedic surgical patients: clinical review [Inernet]. Ottawa: Cardiovascular Research Methods Center, University of Ottawa Heart Institute (CRMC-UOHI); Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network (DSEN); 2016. Available at: http://www.ottawaheart.ca/document/low-molecular-weight-heparin-and-unfractionated-heparin-prevention-venous-thromboembolic. Accessed 10 May 2018.
  10. 10.
    Aujesky D, Stone RA, Kim S, Crick EJ, Fine MJ. Length of hospital stay and postdischarge mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism: a statewide perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(7):706–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kearon C, Akl EA. Duration of anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood. 2014;123(12):1794–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mismetti P, Laporte-Simitsidis S, Tardy B, Cucherat M, Buchmuller A, Juillard-Delsart D, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(1):14–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Linkins L, O’donnell M, Julian J, Kearon C. Intracranial and fatal bleeding according to indication for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(10):2201–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hogg K, Kimpton M, Carrier M, Coyle D, Forgie M, Wells P. Estimating quality of life in acute venous thrombosis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(12):1067–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The central Bank of Iran (CBI); Exchange Rates. 2018. Available at: http://www.cbi.ir/ExRates_fa.aspx. Accessed Nov14,2018.
  16. 16.
    Offord R, Lloyd AC, Anderson P, Bearne A. Economic evaluation of enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26(4):214–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amin M, Fergusson D, Wilson K, Tinmouth A, Aziz A, Coyle D, et al. The societal unit cost of allogenic red blood cells and red blood cell transfusion in Canada. Transfusion. 2004;44(10):1479–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Amirsadri M, Sedighi MJ. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction amongst males with average cardiovascular risk in Iran. Res Pharm Sci. 2017;12(2):144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghandehari K, Izadi-Mood Z. Khorasan stroke registry: analysis of 1392 stroke patients. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10(3):327–34.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delbari A, Salman Roghani R, Tabatabaei SS, Rahgozar M, Lokk J. Stroke epidemiology and one-month fatality among an urban population in Iran. Int J Stroke. 2011;6(3):195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ministry of Health and Medical Education; Tariff Book of Health Services.3rded.2017.Available at: http://ruv.behdasht.gov.ir/index.aspx. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  22. 22.
    Iran Food and Drug Administration (IFDA); National Formulary of Iran (NFI). 2018. Available at: http://irc.fda.gov.ir/nfi. Accessed 7 Aug 2018.
  23. 23.
    Bang H, Zhao H. Median-based incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). J Stat Theory Prac. 2012;6(3):428–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bertram MY, Lauer JA, De Joncheere K, Edejer T, Hutubessy R, Kieny MP, et al. Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(12):925–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 2001;10(8):779–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    The World Bank; GDP per capita. 2018. Availabe at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.
  27. 27.
    Wilbur K, Lynd L, Sadatsafavi M. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in medicine patients—a pharmacoeconomic analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011;17(5):454–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McGarry LJ, Thompson D, Weinstein MC, Goldhaber SZ. Cost effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in acutely ill medical inpatients. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(9):632–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  3. 3.School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations