DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 35–42 | Cite as

Down-regulatory effects of green coffee extract on las I and las R virulence-associated genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  • Hossein Jamalifar
  • Nasrin Samadi
  • Jamileh Nowroozi
  • Mehrouz Dezfulian
  • Mohammad Reza FazeliEmail author
Research Article



Antibiotic resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the cause of Gram negative nosocomial infections especially among the immunosuppressed patients. The bacteria contains las I and las R genes that play very important roles in the pathogenesis and mechanisms of aggression. These genes can be influenced by the quorum sensing (QS) system and such mechanism is becoming clinically important worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the preventive effects of green coffee extract (GCE) on the expression of pathogenesis-related genes, las I and las R in P. aeruginosa.


A total of fifty four P. aeruginosa strains were isolated out of 100 clinical samples collected from the infectious wards in different hospitals (Tehran province) using conventional microscopic and biochemical methods. Susceptibility of the isolates to different antibiotics, GCE and chlorogenic acid were elucidated. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR were performed to detect and quantify the expression levels of las I and las R genes. The presence of chlorogenic acid in GCE was confirmed by HPLC.


Antibiotic susceptibility tests revealed multidrug resistance among the clinical isolates of those 40 strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin (74.07%), 43 to ceftazidime (79.26%), 29 to amikacin (53.7%), 42 to ampicillin (77.77%), 17 to colistin (31.48%), 40 to gentamicin (74.77%), and 50 to piperacillin (92.59%). PCR outcomes exhibited that the frequency of las I and las R genes were 100% in resistant and sensitive strains isolated from clinical and standard strains of P. aeruginosa (ATCC 15449). Real-time PCR analyses revealed that GCE significantly prevented the expression of las I and las R genes in P. aeruginosa. GCE at concentration level as low as 2.5 mg/mL could prevent the expression of lasI and lasR genes in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates.


The presence and expression levels of las I and las R genes in P. aeruginosa isolates were investigated when the bacteria was exposed to GCE. Our results tend to suggest that genes involved in pathogenesis of:Pseudomonas aeruginosa are down regulated by quorum sensing effect of chlorogenic acid and therefore GCE could be useful as an adjuvant in combating multidrug resistance strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.


Pseudomonas aeruginosa Chlorogenic acid Green coffee extract Quorum sensing 


Authors’ contributions

This study was PhD thesis of HJ who did all the practical experiments. HJ contributed in the conception, design of the study, data collation and manuscript preparation. NS contributed in the conception and the design of the study. JN contributed in the design of the study. MD supervised the gene analysis experiments. MRF contributed in the conception, the design of the study and gave revisions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


This research was supported by Deputy of Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, (grant No. 31002).

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (ethics committee reference number: IR. TUMS. REC. 1394.2108).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.


  1. 1.
    Brooks G, Carroll KC, Butel J, Morse S. Jawetz Melnick & Adelbergs Medical Microbiology 26/E: McGraw Hill Professional; 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karatuna O, Yagci A. Analysis of quorum sensing-dependent virulence factor production and its relationship with antimicrobial susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(12):1770–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, Greenberg EP. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science. 1998;280(5361):295–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Annapoorani A, Umamageswaran V, Parameswari R, Pandian SK, Ravi AV. Computational discovery of putative quorum sensing inhibitors against LasR and RhlR receptor proteins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012;26(9):1067–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu H, Conibear TC, Bandara R, Aliwarga Y, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. Type III secretion system–associated toxins, proteases, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates associated with keratitis. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31(4):297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waters CM, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:319–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wagner VE, Frelinger JG, Barth RK, Iglewski BH. Quorum sensing: dynamic response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to external signals. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14(2):55–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reading NC, Sperandio V. Quorum sensing: the many languages of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;254(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raina S, Vizio DD, Odell M, Clements M, Vanhulle S, Keshavarz T. Microbial quorum sensing: a tool or a target for antimicrobial therapy? Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009;54(2):65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adonizio A, Kong K-F, Mathee K. Inhibition of quorum sensing-controlled virulence factor production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by South Florida plant extracts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(1):198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fratianni F, Pepe R, Nazzaro F. Polyphenol composition, antioxidant, antimicrobial and quorum quenching activity of the “Carciofo di Montoro”(Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus) global artichoke of the Campania region, southern Italy. Food Nutr Sci. 2014;5(21):2053–62.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalia VC. Quorum sensing inhibitors: an overview. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(2):224–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santana-Gálvez J, Cisneros-Zevallos L, Jacobo-Velázquez DA. Chlorogenic acid: recent advances on its dual role as a food additive and a nutraceutical against metabolic syndrome. Molecules. 2017;22(3):358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kozuma K, Tsuchiya S, Kohori J, Hase T, Tokimitsu I. Antihypertensive effect of green coffee bean extract on mildly hypertensive subjects. Hypertens Res. 2005;28(9):711–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ochiai R, Jokura H, Suzuki A, Tokimitsu I, Ohishi M, Komai N, et al. Green coffee bean extract improves human vasoreactivity. Hypertens Res. 2004;27(10):731–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shimoda H, Seki E, Aitani M. Inhibitory effect of green coffee bean extract on fat accumulation and body weight gain in mice. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006;6(1):9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suzuki A, Kagawa D, Ochiai R, Tokimitsu I, Saito I. Green coffee bean extract and its metabolites have a hypotensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res. 2002;25(1):99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blum J, Lemaire B, Lafay S. Effect of a green decaffeinated coffee extract on glycaemia. NutraFoods 2007;6:13–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farah A, Donangelo CM. Phenolic compounds in coffee. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2006;18(1):23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suárez-Quiroz ML, Taillefer W, López Méndez EM, González-Ríos O, Villeneuve P, Figueroa-Espinoza M-C. Antibacterial activity and antifungal and anti-Mycotoxigenic activities against aspergillus flavus and A. ochraceus of green coffee Chlorogenic acids and dodecyl Chlorogenates. J Food Saf. 2013;33(3):360–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garrity GM. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology: volume one: the archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Almeida AAP, Farah A, Silva DA, Nunan EA, MBA G. Antibacterial activity of coffee extracts and selected coffee chemical compounds against enterobacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54(23):8738–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ayelign A, Sabally K. Determination of chlorogenic acids (CGA) in coffee beans using HPLC. Am J Res Commun. 2013;1(2):78–91.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kadhim D, Ali MR. Prevalence study of quorum sensing groups among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3(11):204–15.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thuptimdang P, Limpiyakorn T, McEvoy J, Prüß BM, Khan E. Effect of silver nanoparticles on Pseudomonas putida biofilms at different stages of maturity. J Hazard Mater. 2015;290:127–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoque MM, Ahmad M, Khisa S, Uddin MN, Jesmine R. Antibiotic resistance pattern in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from different clinical specimens. JAFMC. 2016;11(1):45–9.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh Arora D, Jeet Kaur G, Kaur H. Antibacterial activity of tea and coffee: their extracts and preparations. Int J Food Prop. 2009;12(2):286–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sepahi E, Tarighi S, Ahmadi FS, Bagheri A. Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by two herbal essential oils from Apiaceae family. J Microbiol. 2015;53(2):176–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Senturk S, Ulusoy S, Bosgelmez-Tinaz G, Yagci A. Quorum sensing and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during urinary tract infections. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2012;6(06):501–7.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farah A, Monteiro M, Donangelo CM, Lafay S. Chlorogenic acids from green coffee extract are highly bioavailable in humans. J Nutr. 2008;138(12):2309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ranheim T, Halvorsen B. Coffee consumption and human health–beneficial or detrimental?–mechanisms for effects of coffee consumption on different risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2005;49(3):274–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lindsay J, Laurin D, Verreault R, Hébert R, Helliwell B, Hill GB, et al. Risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective analysis from the Canadian study of health and aging. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(5):445–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Craig AP, Fields C, Liang N, Kitts D, Erickson A. Performance review of a fast HPLC-UV method for the quantification of chlorogenic acids in green coffee bean extracts. Talanta. 2016;154:481–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Karunanidhi A, Thomas R, Van Belkum A, Neela V. In vitro antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of chlorogenic acid against clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia including the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistant strain. Biomed Res Int. 2012;2013.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kabir F, Katayama S, Tanji N, Nakamura S. Antimicrobial effects of chlorogenic acid and related compounds. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem. 2014;57(3):359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hossein Jamalifar
    • 1
  • Nasrin Samadi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jamileh Nowroozi
    • 4
  • Mehrouz Dezfulian
    • 1
  • Mohammad Reza Fazeli
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology, College of Basic Sciences, Karaj BranchIslamic Azad UniversityKarajIran
  2. 2.Department of Drug and Food Control, Faculty of PharmacyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance Research Center, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS)Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Department of MicrobiologyIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations