Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detecting medical prescriptions suspected of fraud using an unsupervised data mining algorithm

  • Research Article
  • Published:
DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, health insurance companies face various types of fraud, like phantom billing, up-coding, and identity theft. Detecting such frauds is thus of vital importance to reduce and eliminate corresponding financial losses. We used an unsupervised data mining algorithm and implemented an outlier detection model to assist the experts in detecting medical prescriptions suspected of fraud. The implementation ran medicine code, patients’ sex, and patients’ age variables through three successive screening steps. The proposed model is capable of detecting 25% to 100% of cases violating the standards for some medicines that are not supposed to be prescribed at the same time in one single prescription. This model can also detect medical prescriptions suspected of fraud with a sensitivity of 62.16%, specificity of 55.11%, and accuracy of 57.2%. This paper shows that data mining can help detecting potential fraud cases in medical prescriptions more quickly and accurately than by the manual inspection as well as reducing the number of medical prescriptions to be checked which will result in reducing investigators heavy workload. The results of the proposed model can also help policymakers to plan for fighting against fraudulent activities.

Detecting Medical Prescriptions Suspected of Fraud Using an Unsupervised Data Mining Algorithm

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arash R, Hossein J, Taryn V. No evidence of the effect of the interventions to combat health care fraud and abuse: a systematic review of literature. PloS one. Public Libr Sci 2012;7(8):e41988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aral KD. Prescription Fraud detection via data mining: a methodology proposal. Ankara: Bilkent University; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li J, Huang K-Y, Jin J, Shi J. A survey on statistical methods for health care fraud detection. Health care management science. Springer 2008;11(3):275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Medical Fraud Detection Through Data Mining. 2002. Megaputer intelligence.

  5. Aral KD, Güvenir HA, Sabuncuoğlu İ, Akar AR. A prescription fraud detection model. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. Elsevier 2012;106(1):37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Copeland L, Edberg D, Panorska AK, Wendel J. Applying business intelligence concepts to Medicaid claim fraud detection. J Inf Syst Appl Res 2012;5(1):51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Busch RS. Healthcare fraud: auditing and detection guide. New York: Wiley; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Baesens B, Van Vlasselaer V, Verbeke W. Fraud analytics using descriptive, predictive, and social network techniques: a guide to data science for fraud detection. New York: Wiley; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoo I, Alafaireet P, Marinov M, Pena-Hernandez K, Gopidi R, Chang J-F, Hua L. Data mining in healthcare and biomedicine: a survey of the literature. Journal of medical systems. Springer 2012;36 (4):2431–2448.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tan PN, Steinbach M, Kumar V. Introduction to Data Mining: Pearson Education. India: Chapter. 9; 2007, p. 624.

  11. Han J, Pei J, Kamber M. Data mining: concepts and techniques. New York: Elsevier; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Olson DL, Delen D. Advanced data mining techniques. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drug Interactions. Available from: https://online.lexi.com/lco/action/interact.

  14. Same Classes Drugs Error in Single Prescription. Available from: https://www.drugs.com/.

  15. Vihinen M. How to evaluate performance of prediction methods measures and their interpretation in variation effect analysis. BMC genomics. BioMed Central 2012;13(4):S2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Yaseri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddad Soleymani, M., Yaseri, M., Farzadfar, F. et al. Detecting medical prescriptions suspected of fraud using an unsupervised data mining algorithm. DARU J Pharm Sci 26, 209–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-018-0227-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-018-0227-z

Keywords

Navigation