Skip to main content
Log in

Residual stress and creep strain analysis of Inconel 718 and stainless steel 316 welds

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical simulation is implemented to study the generation of residual stress and creep behavior for different kinds of welded joints of 316 stainless steel and Inconel 718 base alloys with Inconel 625 as filler alloy. Residual stress is numerically calculated by executing mechanical analysis followed by thermal analysis. It is difficult to validate residual stress generation with experimental results; therefore, the temperature verification method can be employed. The cooling rate has been determined using Newton’s law of cooling considering convective heat transfer across the welded specimen. Time hardening creep law is formulated and implemented to simulate the creep behavior of the weld joints for 1-h time duration. Parallel butt weld is found to be more unscathed as a very low amount of residual stress generation is observed across the weld bead. On the contrary, a large amount of residual stress is observed along the weld bead for T weld joint. Primary and secondary creep stages are observed for 1-h time duration in all types of butt weld joints studied here. In addition, the tertiary creep stage is only observed for lap and T weld joints. The T weld joint shows minimum primary and secondary creep and very large tertiary creep behavior, thereby providing a very high possibility of failure under creep loading conditions. Parallel butt weld joint unveils a very low amount of creep strain compared to creep strain generated in others welded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DebRoy T (2017) Novel Dissimilar Joints Between Alloy 800H and 2.25% Cr and 1% Mo Steel (No. 14-6803). Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States); The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

  2. Hanninen H et al (2006) Dissimilar metal weld joints and their performance in nuclear power plant and oil refinery conditions. VTT Tiedotteita 2347:208

  3. Kim JW et al (2009) Local mechanical properties of Alloy 82/182 dissimilar weld joint between SA508 Gr. 1a and F316 SS at RT and 320 C. J Nucl Mater 384(3):212–221

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frigola P, Development of nuclear quality components using metal additive manufacturing (2018) RadiaBeam Systems. LLC, Santa Monica, CA (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramkumar KD et al (2014) Influence of filler metals and welding techniques on the structure–property relationships of Inconel 718 and AISI 316L dissimilar weldments. Mater Des 1980–2015(62):175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barabash V et al (2007) Materials requirements for the ITER vacuum vessel and in-vessel components-approaching the construction phase

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ioki K et al (1998) Design and material selection for ITER first wall/blanket, divertor and vacuum vessel. J Nucl Mater 258:74–84

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Locci IE, Bowman CL, Gabb TP (2009) Development of high temperature dissimilar joint technology for fission surface power systems

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buffa G et al (2011) Numerical procedure for residual stresses prediction in friction stir welding. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(4):470–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Masubuchi K (2013) Analysis of welded structures: residual stresses, distortion, and their consequences, vol 33. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sarkani S et al (2000) An efficient approach for computing residual stresses in welded joints. Finite Elem Anal Des 35(3):247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stamenković D, Vasović IJSTR (2009) Finite element analysis of residual stress in butt welding two similar plates. Sci Tech Rev 59(1):57–60

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williamson R, Rabin B, Byerly GJCE (1995) FEM study of the effects of interlayers and creep in reducing residual stresses and strains in ceramic-metal joints. Compos Eng 5(7):851–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Y, Luna R (2001) Numerical implementation of temperature and creep in mass concrete. Finite Elem Anal Des 37(2):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yaghi A et al (2013) Finite element simulation of residual stresses induced by the dissimilar welding of a P92 steel pipe with weld metal IN625. Int J Press Vessels Pip 111:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Evans RW (1985) and B. Wilshire, Creep of metals and alloys

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cao J et al (2011) Microstructural analysis on creep properties of dissimilar materials joints between T92 martensitic and HR3C austenitic steels. Mater SciEng A 528(19–20):6103–6111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kauffmann F et al (2013) Creep behavior and in-depth microstructural characterization of dissimilar joints. Sci Technol Adv Mater 14(1):014203

  19. Lee H-Y et al (2007) Creep–fatigue damage for a structure with dissimilar metal welds of modified 9Cr–1Mo steel and 316L stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 29(9-11):1868–1879

  20. Law M, Payten W, Snowden KJJPVT (2000) Creep modeling of welded joints using the theta projection concept and finite element analysis. J Pressure Vessel Technol 122(1):22–26

  21. Sasikala G et al (2000) Creep deformation and fracture behavior of types 316 and 316L (N) stainless steels and their weld metals. Metall Mater Trans A 31:1175–1185

  22. Zehsaz M et al (2014) Parametric study of the creep failure of double lap adhesively bonded joints. Mater Des 64:520–526

  23. Zhang G et al (2012) Numerical simulation of creep damage for low alloy steel welded joint considering as-welding residual stress. Nucl Eng Des 242:26–33

  24. Zhao L et al (2014) Numerical simulation on the effect of welding parameters on welding residual stresses in T92/S30432 dissimilar welded pipe. Adv Eng Softw 68:70–79

  25. Alireza A-S et al (2023) 15 - Predicting adhesive bond performance. Woodhead Publ Mater 493–523

  26. Rijn LPVMV (2000) 6.13 - Design of sailplanes using composite materials. Compr Compos Mater 243–277

  27. North American Stainless (n.d.) Flat Product Stainless Steel Grade Sheet, Retrieved 31/10/2015, from http://www.northamericanstainless.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Grade-316-316L.pdf

  28. Karditsas PJ, Baptiste M-J (1995) Thermal and structural properties of fusion related materials. United Kingdom, UKAEA Government Division

  29. Haynes International Inc (2001) HAYNES 625 alloy. Retrieved 31/10/2015, from http://www.inkosas.cz/download/niklove-slitiny/haynes-625.pdf

  30. Service JM (n.d.) Alloy 625 data sheet - UNS N06625, France, Data sheet, Retrieved 31/10/2015, from http://www.jacquet.biz/JACQUET/USA/files/JCQusa-alloy-625.pdf. Undated.

  31. Haynes International Inc (2001) HAYNES 718 alloy. Retrieved 31/10/2015, from https://www.haynesintl.com/pdf/h3055.pdf

  32. Ahn D et al (2010) Thermal characteristics in the cutting of Inconel 718 superalloy using CW Nd: YAG laser. J Mater Sci Technol 26(4):362–366

  33. Ghouilem K et al (2022) ANSYS modeling interface and creep behavior of concrete matrix on waste glass powder under constant static stress. Mater Today Proc 49:1084–1092

  34. Dropik MJ, Johnson DH, Roth DE (2002) Developing an ANSYS creep model for polypropylene from experimental data. In: Proceedings of International ANSYS Conference, vol 161

  35. Smith WF, Hashemi J (2006) Foundations of materials science and engineering. Mcgraw-Hill Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  36. American Welding Society (AWS) D1 Committee on Structural Welding (1994) Structural Welding Code--steel. Amer Welding Society

  37. AWS D (1978) Structural welding code-Steel. Mar Lin

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ansys MA (2013) Modeling and Meshing Guide, Version 15

    Google Scholar 

  39. Winterton RHS (1999) Newton's law of cooling. Contemp Phys 40(3):205–212

  40. Vollmer M (2009) Newton's law of cooling revisited. Eur J Phys 30(5):1063

  41. Bergman TL et al (2011) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  42. Meyers MA, Chawla KK (2008) Mechanical behavior of materials. Cambridge university press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Ansys MA (2013) Element reference, Version 15

    Google Scholar 

  44. Altstadt E, Mössner T (2000) Extension of the ANSYS® creep and damage simulation capabilities

    Google Scholar 

  45. Doghri I (2013) Mechanics of deformable solids: linear, nonlinear, analytical and computational aspects. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  46. Price JW et al (2008) Comparison of experimental and theoretical residual stresses in welds: the issue of gauge volume. Int J Mech Sci 50(3):513–521

  47. Xu J et al (2014) Residual stress analyses in a pipe welding simulation: 3D pipe versus axi-symmetric models. Procedia Mater Sci 3:511–516

  48. Rao J (1991) Turbomachine blade vibration. New Age International

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gope DK, Chattopadhyaya S (2021) Dissimilar welding of nickel based superalloy with stainless steel: influence of post weld heat treatment. Mater Manuf Process 37(2):136–142

  50. Sahu A, Bag S (2020) Probe pulse conditions and solidification parameters for the dissimilar welding of Inconel 718 and AISI 316L stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A 51:2192–2208

  51. Ramkumar T et al (2017) Studies on the structural property, mechanical relationships and corrosion behaviour of Inconel 718 and SS 316L dissimilar joints by TIG welding without using activated flux. J Manuf Process 30:290–298

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the National Institute of Technology Rourkela, India, for providing computational resources and ANSYS software for simulation and numerical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravindra Giriraj Bhardwaj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended for publication by Commission X - Structural Performances of Welded Joints - Fracture Avoidance

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 3786 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhardwaj, R.G., Pal, S. Residual stress and creep strain analysis of Inconel 718 and stainless steel 316 welds. Weld World 68, 289–305 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-023-01648-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-023-01648-7

Keywords

Navigation