Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stress-strain curve prediction of steel HAZ based on hardness

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prediction of the stress-strain curve at each point in steel HAZ (heat-affected zone) is rather complicated since the HAZ microstructure consists of multiple phases and varies continuously, and hence a simpler prediction method is desired. In this work, thermal simulation tests were conducted for tensile tests and hardness measurements. And using the experimental data, empirical equations to predict the stress-strain curve based on hardness have been developed. The stress-strain curve is divided into three regions. In the first region, the curve is described as a straight line. The curve in the second and the third regions is described by the Swift law, but the constants of the Swift law are different in the second and the third regions. The hardness value is the only data needed for the present prediction. The comparisons of the predictions with the experiments show that the present model can predict the stress-strain curves within an error of 100 MPa for most cases as long as the steel strength is up to 980 MPa. Hence, the present model can provide useful information for the evaluation of weld joint qualities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swift HW (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. J Mech Phys Solids 1:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomota Y, Umemoto M, Komatsubara N, Hiramatsu A, Nakazima N, Moriya A, Watanabe T, Nanba S, Anan G, Kunishige K, Higo Y, Miyahara M (1992) Prediction of mechanical properties of multi-phase steels based on stress-strain curves. ISIJ Int 32:343–349. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.32.343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rauch GC, Leslie WC (1972) The extent and nature of the strength-differential effect in steels. Metall Trans 3:373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02642041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandes JV, Rodrigues DM, Menezes LF, Vieira MF (1998) A modified Swift law for prestrained materials. Int J Plast 14:537–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(98)00027-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li L, Nagai K, Yin F (2010) Prediction on nominal stress-strain curve of anisotropic polycrystal with texture by FE analysis. Mater Trans 51:1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M2010094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimatteo A, Colla V, Lovicu G, Valentini R (2015) Strain hardening behaviour prediction model for automotive high strength multiphase steels. Steel Res Int 86:1574–1582. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201400544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsuchida N, Harjo S, Ohnuki T, Tomota Y (2014) Stress-strain curves of steels. Tetsu-to-Haganẻ 100:1191–1206. https://doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane.100.1191 ((in Japanese))

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill R (1965) Continuum micro-mechanics of elastoplastic polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids 13:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(65)90023-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berveiller M, Zaoui A (1978) An extension of the self-consistent scheme to plastically-flowing polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids 26:325–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(78)90003-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clausen B, Lorentzen T, Leffers T (1998) Self-consistent modelling of the deformation of F. C. C. polycrystals and its implications for diffraction measurements of internal stresses. Acta Mater 46:3087–3098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00014-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weng GJ (1985) Micromechanical determination of two-phase plasticity. Int J Plast 1:275–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(85)90008-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weng GJ (1990) The overall elastoplastic stress-strain relations of dual-phase metals. J Mech Phys Solids 38:419–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(90)90007-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuda K (2002) Prediction of stress-strain curves of elastic-plastic materials based on the Vickers indentation. Philos Mag A 82:1941–1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418610208235706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Itakura N, Yasuda K, Aoki M (1998) Properties of HT980 steel plates and welding materials with low cold cracking susceptibility and their applicability to penstocks. Kawasaki Steel Giho 30:174–180 (in Japanese) https://www.jfe-steel.co.jp/archives/ksc_giho/30-3/j30-174-180.pdf

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Japanese Industrial Standard JIS G 4051 (2016) Carbon steels for machine structural use, Japanese Standard Association.

  16. Japanese Industrial Standard JIS Z 2241 (2011) Metallic materials -tensile testing- method of test at room temperature, Japanese Standard Association.

  17. Kasuya T, Inomoto M, Okazaki Y, Aihara S, Enoki M (2021) HAZ hardness prediction of boron-added steels. Weld World 65:1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-021-01111-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kunigata M, Aihara S, Kawabata T, Kasuya T, Okazaki Y, Inomoto M (2020) Prediction of charpy impact toughness of steel weld heat-affected zones by combined micromechanics and stochastic fracture model -Part I: Model presentation. Eng Frac Mech 230:106965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunigata M, Aihara S, Kawabata T, Kasuya T, Okazaki Y, Inomoto M (2020) Prediction of charpy impact toughness of steel weld heat-affected zones by combined micromechanics and stochastic fracture model -Part II: Model validation by experiment. Eng Frac Mech 230:106966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kasuya T, Yokobori AT, Ozeki G, Ohmi T, Enoki M (2021) Modelling of hydrogen diffusion in a weld cold cracking test: Part 1. Experimental determination of apparent diffusion coefficient and boundary condition. ISIJ Int 61:1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2020-523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kasuya T, Yokobori AT, Ozeki G, Ohmi T, Enoki M (2021) Modelling of hydrogen diffusion in a weld cold cracking test: Part 2. Numerical calculations. ISIJ Int 61:1254–1263. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2020-524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI), Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), “Structural Materials for Innovation” (Funding agency: JST), Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Kasuya.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended for publication by Commission IX - Behaviour of Metals Subjected to Welding

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasuya, T., Inomoto, M., Okazaki, Y. et al. Stress-strain curve prediction of steel HAZ based on hardness. Weld World 66, 273–285 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-021-01198-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-021-01198-w

Keywords

Navigation