Advertisement

Welding in the World

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 535–550 | Cite as

Tempering effect on the fusion boundary region of alloy 625 weld overlay on 8630 steel

  • Tao Dai
  • John C. Lippold
Research Paper

Abstract

The NACE standard MR0175 requires that the HAZ hardness of AISI 8630 steel overlaid with Ni-base Alloy 625 cannot exceed 250 VHN, requiring a postweld heat treatment (PWHT) to decrease the as-welded HAZ hardness. However, PWHT results in the diffusion of carbon from the steel into the overlay and may lead to interface embrittlement. To understand the effect of PWHT on the microstructure and hardness of the regions near fusion boundary, a wide range of PWHT conditions were investigated. The regions of interest include the coarse-grain HAZ (CGHAZ), the partially-mixed zone, the “swirl” structure, the planar growth zone (PGZ), and the Alloy 625 weld metal. The microstructure and hardness were evaluated using optical metallography, SEM, Vickers hardness testing, and nanoindentation. With an increase of the Hollomon-Jaffe parameter (HJP), the CGHAZ hardness decreases, the PGZ hardness increases, and the weld metal hardness also increases but at a much lower rate. At HJP > 19,300, carbide precipitation was observed in the PGZ. Following PWHT, the partially-mixed zone was found to contain fresh martensite since the PWHT temperature was above the A3 temperature of this region. Reducing the cooling rate from the PWHT temperature did not eliminate the untempered martensite in this region. Finally, the behavior of the 8630/625 overlay is compared and contrasted to the F22/625 overlay behavior which was reported previously. This work builds a foundation for future studies on hydrogen-assisted cracking and sulfide stress cracking in Alloy 625 overlay on steels used in the oil and gas industry.

Keywords

Alloy 625 Low alloy steel Heat-affected zone Fusion boundary Postweld heat treatment Carbon migration Metallography Hardness Hardness testing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Cameron International (now Schlumberger) through the NSF I/UCRC, Manufacturing and Materials Joining Innovation Center (MA2JIC) at the Ohio State University. Thanks are due to Acute Technological Services for providing Alloy 625 filler metal and also producing the overlays on the 8630 forgings. In addition, special thanks are due to Mr. Dean Hannam and Mr. Nash Ubale from Schlumberger who arranged for the procurement of the 8630 steel and also for providing technical support throughout this investigation.

References

  1. 1.
    Dai T, Lippold JC (2017) Tempering behavior of fusion boundary region of alloy 625 weld overlay on 2.25Cr-1Mo steel. Weld J 96:467s–480sGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    (2009) Part 2: Cracking-resistant carbon and low-alloy steels, and the use of cast irons. In: ANSI/NACE MR0175/ ISO 15156-2 (ed) Petroleum and natural gas industries — materials for use in H2S-containing environments in oil and gas production, ANSI/NACE/ISOGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexandrov BT, Lippold JC, Sowards JW, Hope AT, Saltzmann DR (2013) Fusion boundary microstructure evolution associated with embrittlement of Ni–base alloy overlays applied to carbon steel. Weld World 57(1):39–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-012-0007-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fenske JA (2010) Microstructure and hydrogen induced failure mechanisms in iron-nickel weldments. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dodge MF (2014) The effect of heat treatment on the embrittlement of dissimilar welded joints. Univeristy of Leicester, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beaugrand VC, Smith LS, Gittos MF (2009) Subsea dissimilar joints: failure mechanisms and opportunities for mitigation. Paper presented at Corrosion 2009, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 22-26 MarchGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dodge MF, Dong HB, Milititsky M, Barnett RP, Marques VF, Gittos MF (2012) Environment-induced cracking in welding joints in subsea oil and gas systems - part I. The Welding Insititute, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollomon J, Jaffe L (1945) Time-temperature relations in tempering steel. Metal Technol 12:223–249Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dai T, Lippold JC (2018) The effect of postweld heat treatment on hydrogen-assisted cracking of F22/625 Overlays. Weld J 97:75s - 90sGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim HJ, Kim DE (2013) Effects of proximity on hardness and elastic modulus measurements of SiO2 and Cu by Nanoindentation. Tribol Lett 49:85–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0050-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mencin P, Van Tyne CJ, Levy BS (2009) Method for measuring the hardness and elastic modulus of the surface layer on hot forging dies using a nano indentation. J Mater Eng 18(8):1067–1072.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rice PM, Stoller RE (2000) Correlation of nanoindentation and conventional mechanical property. MRS Online Proceeding Library Archive. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 649Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sawa T (2010) Correlation between nanoindentation test result and vickers hardness. Proceedings of the IMEKO 2010 TC3, TC5 and TC22 conferences, Pattaya, Thailand, 22−25 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang L, Ohmura T, Tsuzaki K (2012) Application of nanoindentation technique in martensitic structures. Nanoindentation in materials science. InTech, Rijeka, pp 109–130Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hodgson DK, Dai T, Lippold JC (2015) Transformation and tempering behavior of the heat-affected zone of 2.25Cr-1Mo steel. Weld J 94(8):250s–256sGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beaugrand VCM, Smith LS, Gittos MF (2009) Hydrogen embrittlement of 8630M/625 subsea dissimilar joints: factors that influence the performance. Paper presented at ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, 31 May - 5 JuneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Welding Engineering ProgramThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations