Welding in the World

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 403–413 | Cite as

Mechanical behavior of composite parts adhesively jointed with the insert double-lap joint under tensile load

  • İsmail Yasin Sülü
Research Paper


In this paper, composite parts jointed with insert double-lap joint (DLJ) subjected to tensile load were analyzed by using 3-D finite element method (FEM). In the analysis, the composite parts were carbon/epoxy (T 700) with different fiber orientation angles and the adhesive was DP 410. The models for the numerical analyses were generated by using the ANSYS 14.5 software package. The finite element analyses (FEA) were carried out to predict the failure loads. Stress at x, y, and z directions; shear stresses; and the von-Mises stresses on adhesive were obtained at the time of the failure for predetermined parameters. Consequently, the effects of orientation angles, overlap widths and length, and adhesive layer were examined. The most effective parameters were determined for composite parts adhesively bonded with the double lap joint.


Joint design Stress analysis Composite Finite element analysis Non-linear analysis Adhesive joint 


  1. 1.
    Tang JH, Sridhar I, Srikanth N (2013) Static and fatigue failure analysis of adhesively bonded thick composite single lap joints. Compos Sci Technol 86:18–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim KS, Yi YM, Cho GR, Kim CG (2008) Failure prediction and strength improvement of uni-directional composite single lap bonded joints. Compos Struct 82:513–520. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katnam KB, Comer AJ, Stanley WF, Buggy M, Ellingboe AR, Young TM (2011) Characterising prepreg and non-crimp-fabric composite single lap bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 31:679–686. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khalili SMR, Jafarkarimi MH, Abdollahi MA (2009) Creep analysis of fibre reinforced adhesives in single lap joints—experimental study. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 29:656–661. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ariaee S, Tutunchi A, Kianvash A, Entezami AA (2014) Modeling and optimization of mechanical behavior of bonded composite–steel single lap joints by response surface methodology. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 54:30–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reis PNB, Antunes FJV, Ferreira JAM (2005) Influence of superposition length on mechanical resistance of single-lap adhesive joints. Compos Struct 67:125–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abdi H, Papadopoulos J, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A (2017) Enhanced elastic-foundation analysis of balanced single lap adhesive joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 72:80–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stein N, Mardani H, Becker W (2016) An efficient analysis model for functionally graded adhesive single lap joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 70:117–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guin WE, Wang J (2016) Theoretical model of adhesively bonded single lap joints with functionally graded adherents. Eng Struct 124:316–332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ribeiro TEA, Campilho RDSG, da Silva LFM, Goglio L (2016) Damage analysis of composite–aluminium adhesively-bonded single-lap joints. Compos Struct 136:25–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engerer JD, Sancaktar E (2011) The effects of partial bonding in load carrying capacity of single lap joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 31:373–379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsai MY, Morton J (2010) An investigation into the stresses in double-lap adhesive joints with laminated composite adherends. Int J Solids Struct 47:3317–3325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marannano G, Zuccarello B (2015) Numerical experimental analysis of hybrid double lap aluminum-CFRP joints. Compos Part B 71:28–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chataigner S, Caron JF, Diaz AD, Aubagnac C, Benzarti K (2010) Non-linear failure criteria for a double lap bonded joint. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 30:10–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goglio L, Rossetto M (2011) Precision of the one-dimensional solutions for bonded double lap joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 31:301–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Özer H, Öz Ö (2012) Three dimensional finite element analysis of bi-adhesively bonded double lap joint. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 37:50–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chuang WY, Tsai JL (2013) Investigating the performances of stepwise patched double lap joint. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 42:44–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saleh P, Challita G, Khalil K (2015) Stress concentration coefficient in a composite double lap adhesively bonded joint. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 63:102–107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Almitani KH, Othman R (2016) Analytical solution of the harmonic response of visco-elastic adhesively bonded single-lap and double-lap joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 71:55–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu S, Cheng X, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Bao J, Guo X (2016) An investigation of hygrothermal effects on adhesive materials and double lap shear joints of CFRP composite laminates. Composites Part B 91:431–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ozel A, Yazici B, Akpinar S, Aydin MD, Temiz Ş (2014) A study on the strength of adhesively bonded joints with different adherends. Compos Part B 62:167–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang B, Xiong J, Wang X, Ma L, Zhang GQ, Wu LZ, Feng JC (2013) Energy absorption efficiency of carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminates under high velocity impact. Mater Des 50:140–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sülü İY, Temiz Ş, Aydin MD (2015) Layer effects of multi-layered face to face adhesively bonded composite pipes subjected to internal pressure. Academic Journal of Science 04, No 3, pp.195–202Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Temiz S (2006) Application of bi-adhesive in double-strap joints subjected to bending moment. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol 20, pp.1547–1560.
  25. 25.
    Sülü İsmail Yasin (2017) Mechanical behavior of internal pressurized composite pipes jointed with embedded tubular sleeves. Materials Testing 59, No. 3, 272–277.
  26. 26.
    Sülü İsmail Yasin (2017) Mechanical testing and analysis of composite parts adhesively joined under tensile load. Materials Testing 59(5):459–465.

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringInonu UniversityMalatyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations